James Michael Donovan

    • 58 Citations
    • 4 h-Index
    1981 …2017
    If you made any changes in Pure, your changes will be visible here soon.

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics where James Michael Donovan is active. These topic labels come from the works of this person. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    • 12 Similar Profiles
    France Social Sciences
    justice Social Sciences
    nineteenth century Social Sciences
    death penalty Social Sciences
    accused Social Sciences
    deviant behavior Social Sciences
    public opinion Social Sciences
    penalty Social Sciences

    Research Output 1981 2017

    • 58 Citations
    • 4 h-Index
    • 4 Article
    • 4 Review article
    • 1 Book

    Culture and the courts in France: The Plaidoirie Sentimentale in the nineteenth and earlytwentieth centuries

    Donovan, J. M., Aug 1 2017, In : Law and History Review. 35, 3, p. 789-828 40 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    nineteenth century
    France
    emotion
    sympathy
    history
    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Adultery and the decline of the sexual double standard in Marseille, 1825-84

    Donovan, J. M., Jan 1 2015, In : French History. 29, 4, p. 530-549 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Adultery
    Marseille
    Sexual
    Wives
    Divorce

    Public opinion and the french capital punishment debate of 1908

    Donovan, J. M., Jan 1 2014, In : Law and History Review. 32, 3, p. 575-609 35 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    death penalty
    public opinion
    penalty
    justice
    parliament
    France
    Criminal Justice
    Juries
    Crime
    Punishment
    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Not a right but a public function: The debate in the French National Assembly over the 1872 law on jury formation

    Donovan, J. M., Dec 1 2007, In : French History. 21, 4, p. 395-410 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    National Assembly
    Jurors
    Juries
    Judiciary
    Political Debate