1.5: 1 meshed AlloDerm bolsters for stapled rectal anastomoses does not provide any advantage in anastomotic strength in a porcine model

Alyssa D. Fajardo, Jonathan Chun, David Stewart, Bashar Safar, James W. Fleshman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The most feared complication of colorectal anastomoses is leaks resulting in severe morbidity. The concept of staple-line reinforcement is a growing area of interest. In this study, the authors evaluated the feasibility and effect of using 1.5:1 meshed AlloDerm to bolster end-to-end stapled rectal anastomoses in a porcine model. Methods: A total of 30 female 45-kg domestic pigs were studied, and each served as its own control by creating a bolstered and unbolstered anastomosis in each animal. All anastomoses were created with a 29-mm end-to-end stapling device. Bolstered anastomoses were randomized to proximal and distal positions along the rectum, and each rectorectal anastomosis was separated by an average of 10 cm. The animals were survived to 3, 5, and 30 days. Barium enemas were then performed and the 2 anastomotic sites harvested. Each anastomosis underwent burst testing. The internal diameter of each anastomosis was measured, and a biochemical analysis was performed for elastin and collagen content. Results: Bolstered anastomoses offered no strength advantage as burst pressures were no different when compared with unbolstered anastomoses. There was also no difference in anastomotic internal diameter, biochemical analysis of elastin or collagen, or presence of adhesions when comparing bolstered with unbolstered anastomoses. There were 4 subclinical leaks-1 in the unbolstered group and 3 in the bolstered group. Conclusions: The routine use of 1.5:1 meshed AlloDerm sandwich bolsters in stapled rectal anastomosis does not confer any detectable advantage in anastomotic strength. Further studies are needed to determine equivalence to traditional stapled anastomoses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-28
Number of pages8
JournalSurgical Innovation
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

Elastin
Swine
Collagen
Sus scrofa
Rectum
Morbidity
Pressure
Equipment and Supplies
Alloderm
Barium Enema

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Fajardo, Alyssa D. ; Chun, Jonathan ; Stewart, David ; Safar, Bashar ; Fleshman, James W. / 1.5 : 1 meshed AlloDerm bolsters for stapled rectal anastomoses does not provide any advantage in anastomotic strength in a porcine model. In: Surgical Innovation. 2011 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 21-28.
@article{ebff166b40c54bf083ce2d7e39d7e74d,
title = "1.5: 1 meshed AlloDerm bolsters for stapled rectal anastomoses does not provide any advantage in anastomotic strength in a porcine model",
abstract = "Introduction: The most feared complication of colorectal anastomoses is leaks resulting in severe morbidity. The concept of staple-line reinforcement is a growing area of interest. In this study, the authors evaluated the feasibility and effect of using 1.5:1 meshed AlloDerm to bolster end-to-end stapled rectal anastomoses in a porcine model. Methods: A total of 30 female 45-kg domestic pigs were studied, and each served as its own control by creating a bolstered and unbolstered anastomosis in each animal. All anastomoses were created with a 29-mm end-to-end stapling device. Bolstered anastomoses were randomized to proximal and distal positions along the rectum, and each rectorectal anastomosis was separated by an average of 10 cm. The animals were survived to 3, 5, and 30 days. Barium enemas were then performed and the 2 anastomotic sites harvested. Each anastomosis underwent burst testing. The internal diameter of each anastomosis was measured, and a biochemical analysis was performed for elastin and collagen content. Results: Bolstered anastomoses offered no strength advantage as burst pressures were no different when compared with unbolstered anastomoses. There was also no difference in anastomotic internal diameter, biochemical analysis of elastin or collagen, or presence of adhesions when comparing bolstered with unbolstered anastomoses. There were 4 subclinical leaks-1 in the unbolstered group and 3 in the bolstered group. Conclusions: The routine use of 1.5:1 meshed AlloDerm sandwich bolsters in stapled rectal anastomosis does not confer any detectable advantage in anastomotic strength. Further studies are needed to determine equivalence to traditional stapled anastomoses.",
author = "Fajardo, {Alyssa D.} and Jonathan Chun and David Stewart and Bashar Safar and Fleshman, {James W.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1553350610370696",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "21--28",
journal = "Surgical Innovation",
issn = "1553-3506",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

1.5 : 1 meshed AlloDerm bolsters for stapled rectal anastomoses does not provide any advantage in anastomotic strength in a porcine model. / Fajardo, Alyssa D.; Chun, Jonathan; Stewart, David; Safar, Bashar; Fleshman, James W.

In: Surgical Innovation, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.03.2011, p. 21-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 1.5

T2 - 1 meshed AlloDerm bolsters for stapled rectal anastomoses does not provide any advantage in anastomotic strength in a porcine model

AU - Fajardo, Alyssa D.

AU - Chun, Jonathan

AU - Stewart, David

AU - Safar, Bashar

AU - Fleshman, James W.

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Introduction: The most feared complication of colorectal anastomoses is leaks resulting in severe morbidity. The concept of staple-line reinforcement is a growing area of interest. In this study, the authors evaluated the feasibility and effect of using 1.5:1 meshed AlloDerm to bolster end-to-end stapled rectal anastomoses in a porcine model. Methods: A total of 30 female 45-kg domestic pigs were studied, and each served as its own control by creating a bolstered and unbolstered anastomosis in each animal. All anastomoses were created with a 29-mm end-to-end stapling device. Bolstered anastomoses were randomized to proximal and distal positions along the rectum, and each rectorectal anastomosis was separated by an average of 10 cm. The animals were survived to 3, 5, and 30 days. Barium enemas were then performed and the 2 anastomotic sites harvested. Each anastomosis underwent burst testing. The internal diameter of each anastomosis was measured, and a biochemical analysis was performed for elastin and collagen content. Results: Bolstered anastomoses offered no strength advantage as burst pressures were no different when compared with unbolstered anastomoses. There was also no difference in anastomotic internal diameter, biochemical analysis of elastin or collagen, or presence of adhesions when comparing bolstered with unbolstered anastomoses. There were 4 subclinical leaks-1 in the unbolstered group and 3 in the bolstered group. Conclusions: The routine use of 1.5:1 meshed AlloDerm sandwich bolsters in stapled rectal anastomosis does not confer any detectable advantage in anastomotic strength. Further studies are needed to determine equivalence to traditional stapled anastomoses.

AB - Introduction: The most feared complication of colorectal anastomoses is leaks resulting in severe morbidity. The concept of staple-line reinforcement is a growing area of interest. In this study, the authors evaluated the feasibility and effect of using 1.5:1 meshed AlloDerm to bolster end-to-end stapled rectal anastomoses in a porcine model. Methods: A total of 30 female 45-kg domestic pigs were studied, and each served as its own control by creating a bolstered and unbolstered anastomosis in each animal. All anastomoses were created with a 29-mm end-to-end stapling device. Bolstered anastomoses were randomized to proximal and distal positions along the rectum, and each rectorectal anastomosis was separated by an average of 10 cm. The animals were survived to 3, 5, and 30 days. Barium enemas were then performed and the 2 anastomotic sites harvested. Each anastomosis underwent burst testing. The internal diameter of each anastomosis was measured, and a biochemical analysis was performed for elastin and collagen content. Results: Bolstered anastomoses offered no strength advantage as burst pressures were no different when compared with unbolstered anastomoses. There was also no difference in anastomotic internal diameter, biochemical analysis of elastin or collagen, or presence of adhesions when comparing bolstered with unbolstered anastomoses. There were 4 subclinical leaks-1 in the unbolstered group and 3 in the bolstered group. Conclusions: The routine use of 1.5:1 meshed AlloDerm sandwich bolsters in stapled rectal anastomosis does not confer any detectable advantage in anastomotic strength. Further studies are needed to determine equivalence to traditional stapled anastomoses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952983191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952983191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1553350610370696

DO - 10.1177/1553350610370696

M3 - Article

C2 - 20542954

AN - SCOPUS:79952983191

VL - 18

SP - 21

EP - 28

JO - Surgical Innovation

JF - Surgical Innovation

SN - 1553-3506

IS - 1

ER -