2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards update: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

Thomas M. Bashore, Stephen Balter, Ana Barac, John G. Byrne, Jeffrey J. Cavendish, Charles E. Chambers, James Bernard Hermiller, Scott Kinlay, Joel S. Landzberg, Warren K. Laskey, Charles R. McKay, Julie M. Miller, David J. Moliterno, John W.M. Moore, Sandra M. Oliver-Mcneil, Jeffrey J. Popma, Carl L. Tommaso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The last expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards was published in 2001 (1). Since then, many changes have occurred as the setting has evolved from being primarily diagnostic based into a therapeutic environment. Technology has changed both the imaging and reporting systems. The lower risk of invasive procedures has seen the expansion of cardiac catheterization laboratories to sites without onsite cardiovascular surgery backup and even to community hospitals where primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is now being performed. This has increased the importance of quality assurance (QA) and quality improvement (QI) initiatives. At the same time, the laboratory has become a multipurpose suite with both diagnostic procedures to investigate pulmonary hypertension and coronary flow and with therapeutic procedures that now include intervention into the cerebral and peripheral vascular systems as well as in structural heart disease. These new procedures have impacted both the adult and pediatric catheterization laboratories. The approaches now available allow for the treatment of even very complex heart disease and have led to the development of hybrid cardiac catheterization laboratories where a team of physicians (including invasive cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, noninvasive cardiologists, and anesthesiologists) is required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2221-2305
Number of pages85
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume59
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 12 2012

Fingerprint

Advisory Committees
Cardiac Catheterization
Heart Diseases
Community Hospital
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Quality Improvement
Pulmonary Hypertension
Catheterization
Blood Vessels
Therapeutics
Pediatrics
Technology
Physicians
Cardiologists

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Bashore, Thomas M. ; Balter, Stephen ; Barac, Ana ; Byrne, John G. ; Cavendish, Jeffrey J. ; Chambers, Charles E. ; Hermiller, James Bernard ; Kinlay, Scott ; Landzberg, Joel S. ; Laskey, Warren K. ; McKay, Charles R. ; Miller, Julie M. ; Moliterno, David J. ; Moore, John W.M. ; Oliver-Mcneil, Sandra M. ; Popma, Jeffrey J. ; Tommaso, Carl L. / 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards update : A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012 ; Vol. 59, No. 24. pp. 2221-2305.
@article{5d954207e8274a0d8ea6ecd7638ed06b,
title = "2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards update: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents",
abstract = "The last expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards was published in 2001 (1). Since then, many changes have occurred as the setting has evolved from being primarily diagnostic based into a therapeutic environment. Technology has changed both the imaging and reporting systems. The lower risk of invasive procedures has seen the expansion of cardiac catheterization laboratories to sites without onsite cardiovascular surgery backup and even to community hospitals where primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is now being performed. This has increased the importance of quality assurance (QA) and quality improvement (QI) initiatives. At the same time, the laboratory has become a multipurpose suite with both diagnostic procedures to investigate pulmonary hypertension and coronary flow and with therapeutic procedures that now include intervention into the cerebral and peripheral vascular systems as well as in structural heart disease. These new procedures have impacted both the adult and pediatric catheterization laboratories. The approaches now available allow for the treatment of even very complex heart disease and have led to the development of hybrid cardiac catheterization laboratories where a team of physicians (including invasive cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, noninvasive cardiologists, and anesthesiologists) is required.",
author = "Bashore, {Thomas M.} and Stephen Balter and Ana Barac and Byrne, {John G.} and Cavendish, {Jeffrey J.} and Chambers, {Charles E.} and Hermiller, {James Bernard} and Scott Kinlay and Landzberg, {Joel S.} and Laskey, {Warren K.} and McKay, {Charles R.} and Miller, {Julie M.} and Moliterno, {David J.} and Moore, {John W.M.} and Oliver-Mcneil, {Sandra M.} and Popma, {Jeffrey J.} and Tommaso, {Carl L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "2221--2305",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "24",

}

2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards update : A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. / Bashore, Thomas M.; Balter, Stephen; Barac, Ana; Byrne, John G.; Cavendish, Jeffrey J.; Chambers, Charles E.; Hermiller, James Bernard; Kinlay, Scott; Landzberg, Joel S.; Laskey, Warren K.; McKay, Charles R.; Miller, Julie M.; Moliterno, David J.; Moore, John W.M.; Oliver-Mcneil, Sandra M.; Popma, Jeffrey J.; Tommaso, Carl L.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 59, No. 24, 12.06.2012, p. 2221-2305.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards update

T2 - A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

AU - Bashore, Thomas M.

AU - Balter, Stephen

AU - Barac, Ana

AU - Byrne, John G.

AU - Cavendish, Jeffrey J.

AU - Chambers, Charles E.

AU - Hermiller, James Bernard

AU - Kinlay, Scott

AU - Landzberg, Joel S.

AU - Laskey, Warren K.

AU - McKay, Charles R.

AU - Miller, Julie M.

AU - Moliterno, David J.

AU - Moore, John W.M.

AU - Oliver-Mcneil, Sandra M.

AU - Popma, Jeffrey J.

AU - Tommaso, Carl L.

PY - 2012/6/12

Y1 - 2012/6/12

N2 - The last expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards was published in 2001 (1). Since then, many changes have occurred as the setting has evolved from being primarily diagnostic based into a therapeutic environment. Technology has changed both the imaging and reporting systems. The lower risk of invasive procedures has seen the expansion of cardiac catheterization laboratories to sites without onsite cardiovascular surgery backup and even to community hospitals where primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is now being performed. This has increased the importance of quality assurance (QA) and quality improvement (QI) initiatives. At the same time, the laboratory has become a multipurpose suite with both diagnostic procedures to investigate pulmonary hypertension and coronary flow and with therapeutic procedures that now include intervention into the cerebral and peripheral vascular systems as well as in structural heart disease. These new procedures have impacted both the adult and pediatric catheterization laboratories. The approaches now available allow for the treatment of even very complex heart disease and have led to the development of hybrid cardiac catheterization laboratories where a team of physicians (including invasive cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, noninvasive cardiologists, and anesthesiologists) is required.

AB - The last expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards was published in 2001 (1). Since then, many changes have occurred as the setting has evolved from being primarily diagnostic based into a therapeutic environment. Technology has changed both the imaging and reporting systems. The lower risk of invasive procedures has seen the expansion of cardiac catheterization laboratories to sites without onsite cardiovascular surgery backup and even to community hospitals where primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is now being performed. This has increased the importance of quality assurance (QA) and quality improvement (QI) initiatives. At the same time, the laboratory has become a multipurpose suite with both diagnostic procedures to investigate pulmonary hypertension and coronary flow and with therapeutic procedures that now include intervention into the cerebral and peripheral vascular systems as well as in structural heart disease. These new procedures have impacted both the adult and pediatric catheterization laboratories. The approaches now available allow for the treatment of even very complex heart disease and have led to the development of hybrid cardiac catheterization laboratories where a team of physicians (including invasive cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, noninvasive cardiologists, and anesthesiologists) is required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861127537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861127537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 22575325

AN - SCOPUS:84861127537

VL - 59

SP - 2221

EP - 2305

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 24

ER -