256 Shades of gray: uncertainty and diagnostic error in radiology

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Radiologists practice in an environment of extraordinarily high uncertainty, which results partly from the high variability of the physical and technical aspects of imaging, partly from the inherent limitations in the diagnostic power of the various imaging modalities, and partly from the complex visual-perceptual and cognitive processes involved in image interpretation. This paper reviews the high level of uncertainty inherent to the process of radiological imaging and image interpretation vis-à-vis the issue of radiological interpretive error, in order to highlight the considerable degree of overlap that exists between these. The scope of radiological error, its many potential causes and various error-reduction strategies in radiology are also reviewed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-157
Number of pages9
JournalDiagnosis (Berlin, Germany)
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 26 2017

Fingerprint

Radiology
Diagnostic Errors
Uncertainty
Imaging techniques
Radiologists

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Biochemistry, medical

Cite this

@article{118e05854a254b469eeae16fa355eeb7,
title = "256 Shades of gray: uncertainty and diagnostic error in radiology",
abstract = "Radiologists practice in an environment of extraordinarily high uncertainty, which results partly from the high variability of the physical and technical aspects of imaging, partly from the inherent limitations in the diagnostic power of the various imaging modalities, and partly from the complex visual-perceptual and cognitive processes involved in image interpretation. This paper reviews the high level of uncertainty inherent to the process of radiological imaging and image interpretation vis-{\`a}-vis the issue of radiological interpretive error, in order to highlight the considerable degree of overlap that exists between these. The scope of radiological error, its many potential causes and various error-reduction strategies in radiology are also reviewed.",
author = "Michael Bruno",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1515/dx-2017-0006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "149--157",
journal = "Diagnosis",
issn = "2194-8011",
publisher = "Hindawi Limited",
number = "3",

}

256 Shades of gray : uncertainty and diagnostic error in radiology. / Bruno, Michael.

In: Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany), Vol. 4, No. 3, 26.09.2017, p. 149-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - 256 Shades of gray

T2 - uncertainty and diagnostic error in radiology

AU - Bruno, Michael

PY - 2017/9/26

Y1 - 2017/9/26

N2 - Radiologists practice in an environment of extraordinarily high uncertainty, which results partly from the high variability of the physical and technical aspects of imaging, partly from the inherent limitations in the diagnostic power of the various imaging modalities, and partly from the complex visual-perceptual and cognitive processes involved in image interpretation. This paper reviews the high level of uncertainty inherent to the process of radiological imaging and image interpretation vis-à-vis the issue of radiological interpretive error, in order to highlight the considerable degree of overlap that exists between these. The scope of radiological error, its many potential causes and various error-reduction strategies in radiology are also reviewed.

AB - Radiologists practice in an environment of extraordinarily high uncertainty, which results partly from the high variability of the physical and technical aspects of imaging, partly from the inherent limitations in the diagnostic power of the various imaging modalities, and partly from the complex visual-perceptual and cognitive processes involved in image interpretation. This paper reviews the high level of uncertainty inherent to the process of radiological imaging and image interpretation vis-à-vis the issue of radiological interpretive error, in order to highlight the considerable degree of overlap that exists between these. The scope of radiological error, its many potential causes and various error-reduction strategies in radiology are also reviewed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053723559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053723559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/dx-2017-0006

DO - 10.1515/dx-2017-0006

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29536935

AN - SCOPUS:85053723559

VL - 4

SP - 149

EP - 157

JO - Diagnosis

JF - Diagnosis

SN - 2194-8011

IS - 3

ER -