A biomechanical comparison of four reconstruction techniques for the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow

April Armstrong, Cynthia E. Dunning, Louis M. Ferreira, Kenneth J. Faber, James A. Johnson, Graham J.W. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The initial strength of the intact medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the elbow and the strength of 4 reconstruction techniques were compared. Twenty cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in a custom jig with the elbow at 90°, and a pneumatic cyclic valgus loading protocol was used. The mean peak load to failure was 142.5 ± 39.4 N for the intact ligaments and 53.0 ± 9.5 N for the docking reconstructions, 52.5 ± 10.4 N for the EndoButton reconstructions, 41.0 ± 16.0 N for the interference screw reconstructions, and 33.3 ± 7.1 N for the figure-eight reconstructions. The peak load to failure of the MCL reconstructions was inferior compared with the intact ligament (P <. 001). No difference in strength was found between the docking and single-strand medial collateral reconstruction with the use of an EndoButton for ulnar fixation (P >. 05, β =. 14). Both of these reconstruction methods were stronger than the interference screw or figure-eight technique (P <. 004). The optimal fixation method for a single-strand MCL reconstruction may require improved interference screws or a modified EndoButton procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-215
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Collateral Ligaments
Elbow
Ligaments
Upper Extremity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Armstrong, April ; Dunning, Cynthia E. ; Ferreira, Louis M. ; Faber, Kenneth J. ; Johnson, James A. ; King, Graham J.W. / A biomechanical comparison of four reconstruction techniques for the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow. In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2005 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 207-215.
@article{c3afd01465a949d196a6e11fb50ece7e,
title = "A biomechanical comparison of four reconstruction techniques for the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow",
abstract = "The initial strength of the intact medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the elbow and the strength of 4 reconstruction techniques were compared. Twenty cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in a custom jig with the elbow at 90°, and a pneumatic cyclic valgus loading protocol was used. The mean peak load to failure was 142.5 ± 39.4 N for the intact ligaments and 53.0 ± 9.5 N for the docking reconstructions, 52.5 ± 10.4 N for the EndoButton reconstructions, 41.0 ± 16.0 N for the interference screw reconstructions, and 33.3 ± 7.1 N for the figure-eight reconstructions. The peak load to failure of the MCL reconstructions was inferior compared with the intact ligament (P <. 001). No difference in strength was found between the docking and single-strand medial collateral reconstruction with the use of an EndoButton for ulnar fixation (P >. 05, β =. 14). Both of these reconstruction methods were stronger than the interference screw or figure-eight technique (P <. 004). The optimal fixation method for a single-strand MCL reconstruction may require improved interference screws or a modified EndoButton procedure.",
author = "April Armstrong and Dunning, {Cynthia E.} and Ferreira, {Louis M.} and Faber, {Kenneth J.} and Johnson, {James A.} and King, {Graham J.W.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jse.2004.06.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "207--215",
journal = "Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery",
issn = "1058-2746",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

A biomechanical comparison of four reconstruction techniques for the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow. / Armstrong, April; Dunning, Cynthia E.; Ferreira, Louis M.; Faber, Kenneth J.; Johnson, James A.; King, Graham J.W.

In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.01.2005, p. 207-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A biomechanical comparison of four reconstruction techniques for the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow

AU - Armstrong, April

AU - Dunning, Cynthia E.

AU - Ferreira, Louis M.

AU - Faber, Kenneth J.

AU - Johnson, James A.

AU - King, Graham J.W.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - The initial strength of the intact medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the elbow and the strength of 4 reconstruction techniques were compared. Twenty cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in a custom jig with the elbow at 90°, and a pneumatic cyclic valgus loading protocol was used. The mean peak load to failure was 142.5 ± 39.4 N for the intact ligaments and 53.0 ± 9.5 N for the docking reconstructions, 52.5 ± 10.4 N for the EndoButton reconstructions, 41.0 ± 16.0 N for the interference screw reconstructions, and 33.3 ± 7.1 N for the figure-eight reconstructions. The peak load to failure of the MCL reconstructions was inferior compared with the intact ligament (P <. 001). No difference in strength was found between the docking and single-strand medial collateral reconstruction with the use of an EndoButton for ulnar fixation (P >. 05, β =. 14). Both of these reconstruction methods were stronger than the interference screw or figure-eight technique (P <. 004). The optimal fixation method for a single-strand MCL reconstruction may require improved interference screws or a modified EndoButton procedure.

AB - The initial strength of the intact medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the elbow and the strength of 4 reconstruction techniques were compared. Twenty cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in a custom jig with the elbow at 90°, and a pneumatic cyclic valgus loading protocol was used. The mean peak load to failure was 142.5 ± 39.4 N for the intact ligaments and 53.0 ± 9.5 N for the docking reconstructions, 52.5 ± 10.4 N for the EndoButton reconstructions, 41.0 ± 16.0 N for the interference screw reconstructions, and 33.3 ± 7.1 N for the figure-eight reconstructions. The peak load to failure of the MCL reconstructions was inferior compared with the intact ligament (P <. 001). No difference in strength was found between the docking and single-strand medial collateral reconstruction with the use of an EndoButton for ulnar fixation (P >. 05, β =. 14). Both of these reconstruction methods were stronger than the interference screw or figure-eight technique (P <. 004). The optimal fixation method for a single-strand MCL reconstruction may require improved interference screws or a modified EndoButton procedure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15044353780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15044353780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2004.06.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2004.06.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 15789016

AN - SCOPUS:15044353780

VL - 14

SP - 207

EP - 215

JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

SN - 1058-2746

IS - 2

ER -