A bureaucratic-centered image of governance

The founders' thought in modern perspective

David Lynn Lowery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article contributes to the "bureaucratic-centered image of governance" research program advocated by Hill (1991). It examines political thought about bureaucracy during America's formative period, making the central argument that conventional wisdom about the founders is wrong: What is now called bureaucracy was quite important to their thinking. At the same time, however, the conceptual schema within which they analyzed bureaucracy was radically different from the present schema. This difference illuminates important attributes of contemporary debates about the power of bureaucracy. These themes are explored by examining three works comprising the canon of the Republican synthesis, a recent interpretation of revolutionary and immediate postrevolutionary political thought.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)182-208
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Volume3
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1 1993

Fingerprint

bureaucracy
governance
wisdom
interpretation
Governance
Bureaucracy
present

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{4594d2bdf56a4ce088e1c7d3b6aa8a05,
title = "A bureaucratic-centered image of governance: The founders' thought in modern perspective",
abstract = "This article contributes to the {"}bureaucratic-centered image of governance{"} research program advocated by Hill (1991). It examines political thought about bureaucracy during America's formative period, making the central argument that conventional wisdom about the founders is wrong: What is now called bureaucracy was quite important to their thinking. At the same time, however, the conceptual schema within which they analyzed bureaucracy was radically different from the present schema. This difference illuminates important attributes of contemporary debates about the power of bureaucracy. These themes are explored by examining three works comprising the canon of the Republican synthesis, a recent interpretation of revolutionary and immediate postrevolutionary political thought.",
author = "Lowery, {David Lynn}",
year = "1993",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "182--208",
journal = "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory",
issn = "1053-1858",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

A bureaucratic-centered image of governance : The founders' thought in modern perspective. / Lowery, David Lynn.

In: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.04.1993, p. 182-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A bureaucratic-centered image of governance

T2 - The founders' thought in modern perspective

AU - Lowery, David Lynn

PY - 1993/4/1

Y1 - 1993/4/1

N2 - This article contributes to the "bureaucratic-centered image of governance" research program advocated by Hill (1991). It examines political thought about bureaucracy during America's formative period, making the central argument that conventional wisdom about the founders is wrong: What is now called bureaucracy was quite important to their thinking. At the same time, however, the conceptual schema within which they analyzed bureaucracy was radically different from the present schema. This difference illuminates important attributes of contemporary debates about the power of bureaucracy. These themes are explored by examining three works comprising the canon of the Republican synthesis, a recent interpretation of revolutionary and immediate postrevolutionary political thought.

AB - This article contributes to the "bureaucratic-centered image of governance" research program advocated by Hill (1991). It examines political thought about bureaucracy during America's formative period, making the central argument that conventional wisdom about the founders is wrong: What is now called bureaucracy was quite important to their thinking. At the same time, however, the conceptual schema within which they analyzed bureaucracy was radically different from the present schema. This difference illuminates important attributes of contemporary debates about the power of bureaucracy. These themes are explored by examining three works comprising the canon of the Republican synthesis, a recent interpretation of revolutionary and immediate postrevolutionary political thought.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0009116984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0009116984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 182

EP - 208

JO - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

JF - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

SN - 1053-1858

IS - 2

ER -