A case-control comparison of lingual tonsillar size in children with and without down syndrome

Ahmad R. Sedaghat, Renee Flax-Goldenberg, Bob W. Gayler, George T. Capone, Stacey L. Ishman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Lingual tonsillar hypertrophy is a common cause of persistent obstructive sleep apnea following adenotonsillectomy in the pediatric population and may be more prevalent in patients with Down syndrome (DS). We sought to quantify lingual tonsil size in pediatric DS patients and compare these findings to those of nonsyndromic children using cervical spine (c-spine) radiographs. Study Design: Case control study. Methods: Retrospective review of c-spine radiographs from 105 pediatric DS patients and 89 age- and gender-matched non-DS controls was conducted. Films performed for possible airway compromise or trauma were excluded. Lingual tonsil size and narrowest lumen diameter of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx were measured. Results: Radiographically identifiable lingual tonsillar tissue was identified in 34% of children with DS and 30% of controls (P =.21); lingual tonsillar hypertrophy (≥10 mm) was seen in 5% and 0% respectively (P =.074). Nasopharyngeal diameter was smaller in patients with DS compared to controls (5.2 mm vs. 6.3 mm, P =.026), whereas lingual tonsil size was significantly larger in DS patients (2.1 mm vs. 0.8 mm, P =.0008). In multivariate analysis, lingual tonsil size was positively correlated with increasing age in the DS population (r = 0.38, P <.0001) but not in controls. Conclusions: Lingual tonsillar enlargement is more common in patients with DS than in controls, with an increased prevalence in older DS patients. C-spine radiographs are routinely carried out in these children and appear to be useful in identifying lingual tonsillar hypertrophy. Further trials should be carried out to compare c-spine findings and physical exam or magnetic resonance imaging to validate this method of evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1165-1169
Number of pages5
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume122
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012

Fingerprint

Down Syndrome
Tongue
Palatine Tonsil
Spine
Hypertrophy
Pediatrics
Hypopharynx
Oropharynx
Nasopharynx
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Population
Case-Control Studies
Multivariate Analysis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Sedaghat, Ahmad R. ; Flax-Goldenberg, Renee ; Gayler, Bob W. ; Capone, George T. ; Ishman, Stacey L. / A case-control comparison of lingual tonsillar size in children with and without down syndrome. In: Laryngoscope. 2012 ; Vol. 122, No. 5. pp. 1165-1169.
@article{10aceb0dced4439282fddba86d8da129,
title = "A case-control comparison of lingual tonsillar size in children with and without down syndrome",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: Lingual tonsillar hypertrophy is a common cause of persistent obstructive sleep apnea following adenotonsillectomy in the pediatric population and may be more prevalent in patients with Down syndrome (DS). We sought to quantify lingual tonsil size in pediatric DS patients and compare these findings to those of nonsyndromic children using cervical spine (c-spine) radiographs. Study Design: Case control study. Methods: Retrospective review of c-spine radiographs from 105 pediatric DS patients and 89 age- and gender-matched non-DS controls was conducted. Films performed for possible airway compromise or trauma were excluded. Lingual tonsil size and narrowest lumen diameter of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx were measured. Results: Radiographically identifiable lingual tonsillar tissue was identified in 34{\%} of children with DS and 30{\%} of controls (P =.21); lingual tonsillar hypertrophy (≥10 mm) was seen in 5{\%} and 0{\%} respectively (P =.074). Nasopharyngeal diameter was smaller in patients with DS compared to controls (5.2 mm vs. 6.3 mm, P =.026), whereas lingual tonsil size was significantly larger in DS patients (2.1 mm vs. 0.8 mm, P =.0008). In multivariate analysis, lingual tonsil size was positively correlated with increasing age in the DS population (r = 0.38, P <.0001) but not in controls. Conclusions: Lingual tonsillar enlargement is more common in patients with DS than in controls, with an increased prevalence in older DS patients. C-spine radiographs are routinely carried out in these children and appear to be useful in identifying lingual tonsillar hypertrophy. Further trials should be carried out to compare c-spine findings and physical exam or magnetic resonance imaging to validate this method of evaluation.",
author = "Sedaghat, {Ahmad R.} and Renee Flax-Goldenberg and Gayler, {Bob W.} and Capone, {George T.} and Ishman, {Stacey L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.22346",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "1165--1169",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

A case-control comparison of lingual tonsillar size in children with and without down syndrome. / Sedaghat, Ahmad R.; Flax-Goldenberg, Renee; Gayler, Bob W.; Capone, George T.; Ishman, Stacey L.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 122, No. 5, 01.05.2012, p. 1165-1169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A case-control comparison of lingual tonsillar size in children with and without down syndrome

AU - Sedaghat, Ahmad R.

AU - Flax-Goldenberg, Renee

AU - Gayler, Bob W.

AU - Capone, George T.

AU - Ishman, Stacey L.

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: Lingual tonsillar hypertrophy is a common cause of persistent obstructive sleep apnea following adenotonsillectomy in the pediatric population and may be more prevalent in patients with Down syndrome (DS). We sought to quantify lingual tonsil size in pediatric DS patients and compare these findings to those of nonsyndromic children using cervical spine (c-spine) radiographs. Study Design: Case control study. Methods: Retrospective review of c-spine radiographs from 105 pediatric DS patients and 89 age- and gender-matched non-DS controls was conducted. Films performed for possible airway compromise or trauma were excluded. Lingual tonsil size and narrowest lumen diameter of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx were measured. Results: Radiographically identifiable lingual tonsillar tissue was identified in 34% of children with DS and 30% of controls (P =.21); lingual tonsillar hypertrophy (≥10 mm) was seen in 5% and 0% respectively (P =.074). Nasopharyngeal diameter was smaller in patients with DS compared to controls (5.2 mm vs. 6.3 mm, P =.026), whereas lingual tonsil size was significantly larger in DS patients (2.1 mm vs. 0.8 mm, P =.0008). In multivariate analysis, lingual tonsil size was positively correlated with increasing age in the DS population (r = 0.38, P <.0001) but not in controls. Conclusions: Lingual tonsillar enlargement is more common in patients with DS than in controls, with an increased prevalence in older DS patients. C-spine radiographs are routinely carried out in these children and appear to be useful in identifying lingual tonsillar hypertrophy. Further trials should be carried out to compare c-spine findings and physical exam or magnetic resonance imaging to validate this method of evaluation.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: Lingual tonsillar hypertrophy is a common cause of persistent obstructive sleep apnea following adenotonsillectomy in the pediatric population and may be more prevalent in patients with Down syndrome (DS). We sought to quantify lingual tonsil size in pediatric DS patients and compare these findings to those of nonsyndromic children using cervical spine (c-spine) radiographs. Study Design: Case control study. Methods: Retrospective review of c-spine radiographs from 105 pediatric DS patients and 89 age- and gender-matched non-DS controls was conducted. Films performed for possible airway compromise or trauma were excluded. Lingual tonsil size and narrowest lumen diameter of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx were measured. Results: Radiographically identifiable lingual tonsillar tissue was identified in 34% of children with DS and 30% of controls (P =.21); lingual tonsillar hypertrophy (≥10 mm) was seen in 5% and 0% respectively (P =.074). Nasopharyngeal diameter was smaller in patients with DS compared to controls (5.2 mm vs. 6.3 mm, P =.026), whereas lingual tonsil size was significantly larger in DS patients (2.1 mm vs. 0.8 mm, P =.0008). In multivariate analysis, lingual tonsil size was positively correlated with increasing age in the DS population (r = 0.38, P <.0001) but not in controls. Conclusions: Lingual tonsillar enlargement is more common in patients with DS than in controls, with an increased prevalence in older DS patients. C-spine radiographs are routinely carried out in these children and appear to be useful in identifying lingual tonsillar hypertrophy. Further trials should be carried out to compare c-spine findings and physical exam or magnetic resonance imaging to validate this method of evaluation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859924351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859924351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.22346

DO - 10.1002/lary.22346

M3 - Article

C2 - 22374875

AN - SCOPUS:84859924351

VL - 122

SP - 1165

EP - 1169

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 5

ER -