A case study of alternative site response explanatory variables in Parkfield, California

E. M. Thompson, L. G. Baise, Robert E. Kayen, Eugene C. Morgan, James Kaklamanos

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The combination of densely-spaced strong-motion stations in Parkfield, California, and spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW) profiles provides an ideal dataset for assessing the accuracy of different site response explanatory variables. We judge accuracy in terms of spatial coverage and correlation with observations. The performance of the alternative models is period-dependent, but generally we observe that: (1) where a profile is available, the square-root-of-impedance method outperforms VS30 (average S-wave velocity to 30 m depth), and (2) where a profile is unavailable, the topographic-slope method outperforms surficial geology. The fundamental site frequency is a valuable site response explanatory variable, though less valuable than VS30. However, given the expense and difficulty of obtaining reliable estimates of VS30 and the relative ease with which the fundamental site frequency can be computed, the fundamental site frequency may prove to be a valuable site response explanatory variable for many applications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGeoRisk 2011
Subtitle of host publicationGeotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference
Pages310-317
Number of pages8
Edition224 GSP
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 25 2011
EventGeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Atlanta, GA, United States
Duration: Jun 26 2011Jun 28 2011

Publication series

NameGeotechnical Special Publication
Number224 GSP
ISSN (Print)0895-0563

Other

OtherGeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management
CountryUnited States
CityAtlanta, GA
Period6/26/116/28/11

Fingerprint

Geology
Surface waves
Spectrum analysis
strong motion
spectral analysis
surface wave
wave velocity
S-wave
geology
method
station

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Architecture
  • Building and Construction
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Thompson, E. M., Baise, L. G., Kayen, R. E., Morgan, E. C., & Kaklamanos, J. (2011). A case study of alternative site response explanatory variables in Parkfield, California. In GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference (224 GSP ed., pp. 310-317). (Geotechnical Special Publication; No. 224 GSP). https://doi.org/10.1061/41183(418)25
Thompson, E. M. ; Baise, L. G. ; Kayen, Robert E. ; Morgan, Eugene C. ; Kaklamanos, James. / A case study of alternative site response explanatory variables in Parkfield, California. GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference. 224 GSP. ed. 2011. pp. 310-317 (Geotechnical Special Publication; 224 GSP).
@inproceedings{1d5ee51f4532482cb6c350178af4989c,
title = "A case study of alternative site response explanatory variables in Parkfield, California",
abstract = "The combination of densely-spaced strong-motion stations in Parkfield, California, and spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW) profiles provides an ideal dataset for assessing the accuracy of different site response explanatory variables. We judge accuracy in terms of spatial coverage and correlation with observations. The performance of the alternative models is period-dependent, but generally we observe that: (1) where a profile is available, the square-root-of-impedance method outperforms VS30 (average S-wave velocity to 30 m depth), and (2) where a profile is unavailable, the topographic-slope method outperforms surficial geology. The fundamental site frequency is a valuable site response explanatory variable, though less valuable than VS30. However, given the expense and difficulty of obtaining reliable estimates of VS30 and the relative ease with which the fundamental site frequency can be computed, the fundamental site frequency may prove to be a valuable site response explanatory variable for many applications.",
author = "Thompson, {E. M.} and Baise, {L. G.} and Kayen, {Robert E.} and Morgan, {Eugene C.} and James Kaklamanos",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1061/41183(418)25",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780784411834",
series = "Geotechnical Special Publication",
number = "224 GSP",
pages = "310--317",
booktitle = "GeoRisk 2011",
edition = "224 GSP",

}

Thompson, EM, Baise, LG, Kayen, RE, Morgan, EC & Kaklamanos, J 2011, A case study of alternative site response explanatory variables in Parkfield, California. in GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference. 224 GSP edn, Geotechnical Special Publication, no. 224 GSP, pp. 310-317, GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management, Atlanta, GA, United States, 6/26/11. https://doi.org/10.1061/41183(418)25

A case study of alternative site response explanatory variables in Parkfield, California. / Thompson, E. M.; Baise, L. G.; Kayen, Robert E.; Morgan, Eugene C.; Kaklamanos, James.

GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference. 224 GSP. ed. 2011. p. 310-317 (Geotechnical Special Publication; No. 224 GSP).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - A case study of alternative site response explanatory variables in Parkfield, California

AU - Thompson, E. M.

AU - Baise, L. G.

AU - Kayen, Robert E.

AU - Morgan, Eugene C.

AU - Kaklamanos, James

PY - 2011/8/25

Y1 - 2011/8/25

N2 - The combination of densely-spaced strong-motion stations in Parkfield, California, and spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW) profiles provides an ideal dataset for assessing the accuracy of different site response explanatory variables. We judge accuracy in terms of spatial coverage and correlation with observations. The performance of the alternative models is period-dependent, but generally we observe that: (1) where a profile is available, the square-root-of-impedance method outperforms VS30 (average S-wave velocity to 30 m depth), and (2) where a profile is unavailable, the topographic-slope method outperforms surficial geology. The fundamental site frequency is a valuable site response explanatory variable, though less valuable than VS30. However, given the expense and difficulty of obtaining reliable estimates of VS30 and the relative ease with which the fundamental site frequency can be computed, the fundamental site frequency may prove to be a valuable site response explanatory variable for many applications.

AB - The combination of densely-spaced strong-motion stations in Parkfield, California, and spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW) profiles provides an ideal dataset for assessing the accuracy of different site response explanatory variables. We judge accuracy in terms of spatial coverage and correlation with observations. The performance of the alternative models is period-dependent, but generally we observe that: (1) where a profile is available, the square-root-of-impedance method outperforms VS30 (average S-wave velocity to 30 m depth), and (2) where a profile is unavailable, the topographic-slope method outperforms surficial geology. The fundamental site frequency is a valuable site response explanatory variable, though less valuable than VS30. However, given the expense and difficulty of obtaining reliable estimates of VS30 and the relative ease with which the fundamental site frequency can be computed, the fundamental site frequency may prove to be a valuable site response explanatory variable for many applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051899366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051899366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/41183(418)25

DO - 10.1061/41183(418)25

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:80051899366

SN - 9780784411834

T3 - Geotechnical Special Publication

SP - 310

EP - 317

BT - GeoRisk 2011

ER -

Thompson EM, Baise LG, Kayen RE, Morgan EC, Kaklamanos J. A case study of alternative site response explanatory variables in Parkfield, California. In GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference. 224 GSP ed. 2011. p. 310-317. (Geotechnical Special Publication; 224 GSP). https://doi.org/10.1061/41183(418)25