A chart-based method for identification of delirium: Validation compared with interviewer ratings using the confusion assessment method

Sharon K. Inouye, Linda Leo-Summers, Ying Zhang, Sidney T. Bogardus, Douglas Leslie, Joseph V. Agostini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

208 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To validate a chart-based method for identification of delirium and compare it with direct interviewer assessment using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). DESIGN: Prospective validation study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred nineteen older hospitalized patients. MEASUREMENTS: A chart-based instrument for identification of delirium was created and compared with the reference standard interviewer ratings, which used direct cognitive assessment to complete the CAM for delirium. Trained nurse chart abstractors were blinded to all interview data, including cognitive and CAM ratings. Factors influencing the correct identification of delirium in the chart were examined. RESULTS: Delirium was present in 115 (12.5%) patients according to the CAM. Sensitivity of the chart-based instrument was 74%, specificity was 83%, and likelihood ratio for a positive result was 4.4. Overall agreement between chart and interviewer ratings was 82%, kappa = 0.41. By contrast, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, administrative codes, the sensitivity for delirium was 3%, and specificity was 99%. Independent factors associated with incorrect chart identification of delirium were dementia, severe illness, and high baseline delirium risk. With all three factors present, the chart instrument was three times more likely to identify patients incorrectly than with none of the factors present. CONCLUSION: A chart-based instrument for delirium, which should be useful for patient safety and quality-improvement programs in older persons, was validated. Because of potential misclassification, the chart-based instrument is not recommended for individual patient care or diagnostic purposes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-318
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2005

Fingerprint

Confusion
Delirium
Interviews
Validation Studies
International Classification of Diseases
Patient Safety
Quality Improvement
Teaching Hospitals
Dementia
Patient Care
Nurses
Prospective Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Inouye, Sharon K. ; Leo-Summers, Linda ; Zhang, Ying ; Bogardus, Sidney T. ; Leslie, Douglas ; Agostini, Joseph V. / A chart-based method for identification of delirium : Validation compared with interviewer ratings using the confusion assessment method. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2005 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 312-318.
@article{2cc5c1cea3d848189b4b56b3ca3c5f50,
title = "A chart-based method for identification of delirium: Validation compared with interviewer ratings using the confusion assessment method",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To validate a chart-based method for identification of delirium and compare it with direct interviewer assessment using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). DESIGN: Prospective validation study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred nineteen older hospitalized patients. MEASUREMENTS: A chart-based instrument for identification of delirium was created and compared with the reference standard interviewer ratings, which used direct cognitive assessment to complete the CAM for delirium. Trained nurse chart abstractors were blinded to all interview data, including cognitive and CAM ratings. Factors influencing the correct identification of delirium in the chart were examined. RESULTS: Delirium was present in 115 (12.5{\%}) patients according to the CAM. Sensitivity of the chart-based instrument was 74{\%}, specificity was 83{\%}, and likelihood ratio for a positive result was 4.4. Overall agreement between chart and interviewer ratings was 82{\%}, kappa = 0.41. By contrast, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, administrative codes, the sensitivity for delirium was 3{\%}, and specificity was 99{\%}. Independent factors associated with incorrect chart identification of delirium were dementia, severe illness, and high baseline delirium risk. With all three factors present, the chart instrument was three times more likely to identify patients incorrectly than with none of the factors present. CONCLUSION: A chart-based instrument for delirium, which should be useful for patient safety and quality-improvement programs in older persons, was validated. Because of potential misclassification, the chart-based instrument is not recommended for individual patient care or diagnostic purposes.",
author = "Inouye, {Sharon K.} and Linda Leo-Summers and Ying Zhang and Bogardus, {Sidney T.} and Douglas Leslie and Agostini, {Joseph V.}",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53120.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "312--318",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

A chart-based method for identification of delirium : Validation compared with interviewer ratings using the confusion assessment method. / Inouye, Sharon K.; Leo-Summers, Linda; Zhang, Ying; Bogardus, Sidney T.; Leslie, Douglas; Agostini, Joseph V.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 53, No. 2, 01.02.2005, p. 312-318.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A chart-based method for identification of delirium

T2 - Validation compared with interviewer ratings using the confusion assessment method

AU - Inouye, Sharon K.

AU - Leo-Summers, Linda

AU - Zhang, Ying

AU - Bogardus, Sidney T.

AU - Leslie, Douglas

AU - Agostini, Joseph V.

PY - 2005/2/1

Y1 - 2005/2/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To validate a chart-based method for identification of delirium and compare it with direct interviewer assessment using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). DESIGN: Prospective validation study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred nineteen older hospitalized patients. MEASUREMENTS: A chart-based instrument for identification of delirium was created and compared with the reference standard interviewer ratings, which used direct cognitive assessment to complete the CAM for delirium. Trained nurse chart abstractors were blinded to all interview data, including cognitive and CAM ratings. Factors influencing the correct identification of delirium in the chart were examined. RESULTS: Delirium was present in 115 (12.5%) patients according to the CAM. Sensitivity of the chart-based instrument was 74%, specificity was 83%, and likelihood ratio for a positive result was 4.4. Overall agreement between chart and interviewer ratings was 82%, kappa = 0.41. By contrast, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, administrative codes, the sensitivity for delirium was 3%, and specificity was 99%. Independent factors associated with incorrect chart identification of delirium were dementia, severe illness, and high baseline delirium risk. With all three factors present, the chart instrument was three times more likely to identify patients incorrectly than with none of the factors present. CONCLUSION: A chart-based instrument for delirium, which should be useful for patient safety and quality-improvement programs in older persons, was validated. Because of potential misclassification, the chart-based instrument is not recommended for individual patient care or diagnostic purposes.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To validate a chart-based method for identification of delirium and compare it with direct interviewer assessment using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). DESIGN: Prospective validation study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred nineteen older hospitalized patients. MEASUREMENTS: A chart-based instrument for identification of delirium was created and compared with the reference standard interviewer ratings, which used direct cognitive assessment to complete the CAM for delirium. Trained nurse chart abstractors were blinded to all interview data, including cognitive and CAM ratings. Factors influencing the correct identification of delirium in the chart were examined. RESULTS: Delirium was present in 115 (12.5%) patients according to the CAM. Sensitivity of the chart-based instrument was 74%, specificity was 83%, and likelihood ratio for a positive result was 4.4. Overall agreement between chart and interviewer ratings was 82%, kappa = 0.41. By contrast, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, administrative codes, the sensitivity for delirium was 3%, and specificity was 99%. Independent factors associated with incorrect chart identification of delirium were dementia, severe illness, and high baseline delirium risk. With all three factors present, the chart instrument was three times more likely to identify patients incorrectly than with none of the factors present. CONCLUSION: A chart-based instrument for delirium, which should be useful for patient safety and quality-improvement programs in older persons, was validated. Because of potential misclassification, the chart-based instrument is not recommended for individual patient care or diagnostic purposes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15044355932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15044355932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53120.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53120.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15673358

AN - SCOPUS:15044355932

VL - 53

SP - 312

EP - 318

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 2

ER -