A closer examination of sex bias in the treatment of ischemic cardiac disease

L. A. Green, Mack Ruffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Past studies have conflicted regarding the existence of sex bias in the treatment of women with ischemic cardiac disease. This study explored the effect of different analytic models on conclusions about sex bias. Methods. A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed on 787 patients evaluated for potential acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency departments of two nonteaching community hospitals. The Acute Coronary Ischemia Time Insensitive Predictive Instrument (ACI-TIPI) was used to estimate the likelihood of ischemic disease. The decisions to admit to hospital, not to admit to hospital, and to discharge with diagnosis of myocardial infarction were the outcome variables. Results. Logistic regression models of increasing levels of detail were applied and evaluated. Analysis using summary data (similar to discharge abstracts or claims data) revealed that patient sex affected admission decisions, but an analysis of clinically detailed data by hospital was required to reveal the nature of the effect. There was disparity in admission decisions by sex at one hospital but not at the other. The odds ratio for admission (women vs men) was 0.546 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.91) at Hospital A, and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.72 to 2.05) at Hospital B. This disparity appeared to be related to a high rate of admission (67%) among men with low (<10%) probability of acute ischemia. Conclusions. Differences in treatment of suspected acute cardiac ischemia by sex may be a practice variation phenomenon rather than a uniform bias. When these differences occur, they may represent overtreatment of men rather than inadequate treatment of women. Because summary or billing datasets lack clinical detail, they are inadequate for the study of physician decision- making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-336
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Family Practice
Volume39
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Sexism
Heart Diseases
Ischemia
Therapeutics
Logistic Models
Decision Support Techniques
Community Hospital
Medical Records
Hospital Emergency Service
Decision Making
Odds Ratio
Myocardial Infarction
Physicians

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Family Practice

Cite this

@article{4426c5e3125d4082aa0b5914e6b001d0,
title = "A closer examination of sex bias in the treatment of ischemic cardiac disease",
abstract = "Background. Past studies have conflicted regarding the existence of sex bias in the treatment of women with ischemic cardiac disease. This study explored the effect of different analytic models on conclusions about sex bias. Methods. A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed on 787 patients evaluated for potential acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency departments of two nonteaching community hospitals. The Acute Coronary Ischemia Time Insensitive Predictive Instrument (ACI-TIPI) was used to estimate the likelihood of ischemic disease. The decisions to admit to hospital, not to admit to hospital, and to discharge with diagnosis of myocardial infarction were the outcome variables. Results. Logistic regression models of increasing levels of detail were applied and evaluated. Analysis using summary data (similar to discharge abstracts or claims data) revealed that patient sex affected admission decisions, but an analysis of clinically detailed data by hospital was required to reveal the nature of the effect. There was disparity in admission decisions by sex at one hospital but not at the other. The odds ratio for admission (women vs men) was 0.546 (95{\%} CI, 0.33 to 0.91) at Hospital A, and 1.22 (95{\%} CI, 0.72 to 2.05) at Hospital B. This disparity appeared to be related to a high rate of admission (67{\%}) among men with low (<10{\%}) probability of acute ischemia. Conclusions. Differences in treatment of suspected acute cardiac ischemia by sex may be a practice variation phenomenon rather than a uniform bias. When these differences occur, they may represent overtreatment of men rather than inadequate treatment of women. Because summary or billing datasets lack clinical detail, they are inadequate for the study of physician decision- making.",
author = "Green, {L. A.} and Mack Ruffin",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "331--336",
journal = "Journal of Family Practice",
issn = "0094-3509",
publisher = "Appleton-Century-Crofts",
number = "4",

}

A closer examination of sex bias in the treatment of ischemic cardiac disease. / Green, L. A.; Ruffin, Mack.

In: Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 39, No. 4, 01.01.1994, p. 331-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A closer examination of sex bias in the treatment of ischemic cardiac disease

AU - Green, L. A.

AU - Ruffin, Mack

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - Background. Past studies have conflicted regarding the existence of sex bias in the treatment of women with ischemic cardiac disease. This study explored the effect of different analytic models on conclusions about sex bias. Methods. A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed on 787 patients evaluated for potential acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency departments of two nonteaching community hospitals. The Acute Coronary Ischemia Time Insensitive Predictive Instrument (ACI-TIPI) was used to estimate the likelihood of ischemic disease. The decisions to admit to hospital, not to admit to hospital, and to discharge with diagnosis of myocardial infarction were the outcome variables. Results. Logistic regression models of increasing levels of detail were applied and evaluated. Analysis using summary data (similar to discharge abstracts or claims data) revealed that patient sex affected admission decisions, but an analysis of clinically detailed data by hospital was required to reveal the nature of the effect. There was disparity in admission decisions by sex at one hospital but not at the other. The odds ratio for admission (women vs men) was 0.546 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.91) at Hospital A, and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.72 to 2.05) at Hospital B. This disparity appeared to be related to a high rate of admission (67%) among men with low (<10%) probability of acute ischemia. Conclusions. Differences in treatment of suspected acute cardiac ischemia by sex may be a practice variation phenomenon rather than a uniform bias. When these differences occur, they may represent overtreatment of men rather than inadequate treatment of women. Because summary or billing datasets lack clinical detail, they are inadequate for the study of physician decision- making.

AB - Background. Past studies have conflicted regarding the existence of sex bias in the treatment of women with ischemic cardiac disease. This study explored the effect of different analytic models on conclusions about sex bias. Methods. A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed on 787 patients evaluated for potential acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency departments of two nonteaching community hospitals. The Acute Coronary Ischemia Time Insensitive Predictive Instrument (ACI-TIPI) was used to estimate the likelihood of ischemic disease. The decisions to admit to hospital, not to admit to hospital, and to discharge with diagnosis of myocardial infarction were the outcome variables. Results. Logistic regression models of increasing levels of detail were applied and evaluated. Analysis using summary data (similar to discharge abstracts or claims data) revealed that patient sex affected admission decisions, but an analysis of clinically detailed data by hospital was required to reveal the nature of the effect. There was disparity in admission decisions by sex at one hospital but not at the other. The odds ratio for admission (women vs men) was 0.546 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.91) at Hospital A, and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.72 to 2.05) at Hospital B. This disparity appeared to be related to a high rate of admission (67%) among men with low (<10%) probability of acute ischemia. Conclusions. Differences in treatment of suspected acute cardiac ischemia by sex may be a practice variation phenomenon rather than a uniform bias. When these differences occur, they may represent overtreatment of men rather than inadequate treatment of women. Because summary or billing datasets lack clinical detail, they are inadequate for the study of physician decision- making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027947515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027947515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7931110

AN - SCOPUS:0027947515

VL - 39

SP - 331

EP - 336

JO - Journal of Family Practice

JF - Journal of Family Practice

SN - 0094-3509

IS - 4

ER -