A collaborative process for developing map symbol standards

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Geographic information is commonly disseminated and consumed via visual representations of features and their environmental context on maps. Map design inherently involves generalizing reality, and one method by which mapmakers do so is through the use of symbols to represent features. Here we focus on the challenges associated with supporting mapmakers who need to work together to reach consensus on standardizing their map symbols. Based on a needs assessment study with mapmakers at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, we designed a new, mixed-method symbol standardization process that takes place through a web-based, asynchronous platform. A study to test this new standardization process with mapmakers at DHS revealed that our process allowed participants to identify many issues related to symbol design, meaning, and categorization. The approach elicited sustained, iterative engagement and critical thinking from participants, and results from a post-study survey indicate that participants found it to be useful and usable. Results from our study and user feedback allow us to suggest multiple ways in which our approach and platform can be improved for future applications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-102
Number of pages10
JournalProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Volume21
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011
EventInternational Conference on Spatial Thinking and Geographic Information Sciences 2011, STGIS 2011 - Tokyo, Japan
Duration: Sep 14 2011Sep 16 2011

Fingerprint

symbol
Needs Assessment
Consensus
Homelands
Thinking
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{e1c9480102504b049100ce66ae6b6cd7,
title = "A collaborative process for developing map symbol standards",
abstract = "Geographic information is commonly disseminated and consumed via visual representations of features and their environmental context on maps. Map design inherently involves generalizing reality, and one method by which mapmakers do so is through the use of symbols to represent features. Here we focus on the challenges associated with supporting mapmakers who need to work together to reach consensus on standardizing their map symbols. Based on a needs assessment study with mapmakers at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, we designed a new, mixed-method symbol standardization process that takes place through a web-based, asynchronous platform. A study to test this new standardization process with mapmakers at DHS revealed that our process allowed participants to identify many issues related to symbol design, meaning, and categorization. The approach elicited sustained, iterative engagement and critical thinking from participants, and results from a post-study survey indicate that participants found it to be useful and usable. Results from our study and user feedback allow us to suggest multiple ways in which our approach and platform can be improved for future applications.",
author = "Robinson, {Anthony C.} and Roth, {Robert E.} and Blanford, {Justine I.} and Scott Pezanowski and Alan Maceachren",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "93--102",
journal = "Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences",
issn = "1877-0428",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

A collaborative process for developing map symbol standards. / Robinson, Anthony C.; Roth, Robert E.; Blanford, Justine I.; Pezanowski, Scott; Maceachren, Alan.

In: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 21, 01.01.2011, p. 93-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A collaborative process for developing map symbol standards

AU - Robinson, Anthony C.

AU - Roth, Robert E.

AU - Blanford, Justine I.

AU - Pezanowski, Scott

AU - Maceachren, Alan

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Geographic information is commonly disseminated and consumed via visual representations of features and their environmental context on maps. Map design inherently involves generalizing reality, and one method by which mapmakers do so is through the use of symbols to represent features. Here we focus on the challenges associated with supporting mapmakers who need to work together to reach consensus on standardizing their map symbols. Based on a needs assessment study with mapmakers at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, we designed a new, mixed-method symbol standardization process that takes place through a web-based, asynchronous platform. A study to test this new standardization process with mapmakers at DHS revealed that our process allowed participants to identify many issues related to symbol design, meaning, and categorization. The approach elicited sustained, iterative engagement and critical thinking from participants, and results from a post-study survey indicate that participants found it to be useful and usable. Results from our study and user feedback allow us to suggest multiple ways in which our approach and platform can be improved for future applications.

AB - Geographic information is commonly disseminated and consumed via visual representations of features and their environmental context on maps. Map design inherently involves generalizing reality, and one method by which mapmakers do so is through the use of symbols to represent features. Here we focus on the challenges associated with supporting mapmakers who need to work together to reach consensus on standardizing their map symbols. Based on a needs assessment study with mapmakers at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, we designed a new, mixed-method symbol standardization process that takes place through a web-based, asynchronous platform. A study to test this new standardization process with mapmakers at DHS revealed that our process allowed participants to identify many issues related to symbol design, meaning, and categorization. The approach elicited sustained, iterative engagement and critical thinking from participants, and results from a post-study survey indicate that participants found it to be useful and usable. Results from our study and user feedback allow us to suggest multiple ways in which our approach and platform can be improved for future applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82555203008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82555203008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.018

DO - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.018

M3 - Conference article

VL - 21

SP - 93

EP - 102

JO - Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

JF - Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

SN - 1877-0428

ER -