A comparative test of work-family conflict models and critical examination of work-family linkages

Jesse S. Michel, Jacqueline K. Mitchelson, Lindsey M. Kotrba, James Marshall Lebreton, Boris B. Baltes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

126 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is a comprehensive meta-analysis of over 20 years of work-family conflict research. A series of path analyses were conducted to compare and contrast existing work-family conflict models, as well as a new model we developed which integrates and synthesizes current work-family theory and research. This new model accounted for 40% of the variance in job satisfaction, 38% of the variance in family satisfaction, and 35% of the variance in life satisfaction. In a critical examination of work-family linkages, a series of analyses excluding work-family conflict constructs and pathways resulted in a well-fitting and more parsimonious model that still accounted for 39% of the variance in job satisfaction, 37% of the variance in family satisfaction, and 33% of the variance in life satisfaction. Results indicate that direct effects drive work-family conflict models while indirect effects provide little incremental explanation in regards to satisfaction outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-218
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Vocational Behavior
Volume74
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2009

Fingerprint

family work
examination
job satisfaction
Job Satisfaction
conflict research
Work-family
Linkage
Comparative tests
Work-family conflict
Conflict (Psychology)
Meta-Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Michel, Jesse S. ; Mitchelson, Jacqueline K. ; Kotrba, Lindsey M. ; Lebreton, James Marshall ; Baltes, Boris B. / A comparative test of work-family conflict models and critical examination of work-family linkages. In: Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2009 ; Vol. 74, No. 2. pp. 199-218.
@article{6f9030687f1545b383b88c4fc379e1ad,
title = "A comparative test of work-family conflict models and critical examination of work-family linkages",
abstract = "This paper is a comprehensive meta-analysis of over 20 years of work-family conflict research. A series of path analyses were conducted to compare and contrast existing work-family conflict models, as well as a new model we developed which integrates and synthesizes current work-family theory and research. This new model accounted for 40{\%} of the variance in job satisfaction, 38{\%} of the variance in family satisfaction, and 35{\%} of the variance in life satisfaction. In a critical examination of work-family linkages, a series of analyses excluding work-family conflict constructs and pathways resulted in a well-fitting and more parsimonious model that still accounted for 39{\%} of the variance in job satisfaction, 37{\%} of the variance in family satisfaction, and 33{\%} of the variance in life satisfaction. Results indicate that direct effects drive work-family conflict models while indirect effects provide little incremental explanation in regards to satisfaction outcomes.",
author = "Michel, {Jesse S.} and Mitchelson, {Jacqueline K.} and Kotrba, {Lindsey M.} and Lebreton, {James Marshall} and Baltes, {Boris B.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvb.2008.12.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "199--218",
journal = "Journal of Vocational Behavior",
issn = "0001-8791",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

A comparative test of work-family conflict models and critical examination of work-family linkages. / Michel, Jesse S.; Mitchelson, Jacqueline K.; Kotrba, Lindsey M.; Lebreton, James Marshall; Baltes, Boris B.

In: Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 74, No. 2, 01.04.2009, p. 199-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative test of work-family conflict models and critical examination of work-family linkages

AU - Michel, Jesse S.

AU - Mitchelson, Jacqueline K.

AU - Kotrba, Lindsey M.

AU - Lebreton, James Marshall

AU - Baltes, Boris B.

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - This paper is a comprehensive meta-analysis of over 20 years of work-family conflict research. A series of path analyses were conducted to compare and contrast existing work-family conflict models, as well as a new model we developed which integrates and synthesizes current work-family theory and research. This new model accounted for 40% of the variance in job satisfaction, 38% of the variance in family satisfaction, and 35% of the variance in life satisfaction. In a critical examination of work-family linkages, a series of analyses excluding work-family conflict constructs and pathways resulted in a well-fitting and more parsimonious model that still accounted for 39% of the variance in job satisfaction, 37% of the variance in family satisfaction, and 33% of the variance in life satisfaction. Results indicate that direct effects drive work-family conflict models while indirect effects provide little incremental explanation in regards to satisfaction outcomes.

AB - This paper is a comprehensive meta-analysis of over 20 years of work-family conflict research. A series of path analyses were conducted to compare and contrast existing work-family conflict models, as well as a new model we developed which integrates and synthesizes current work-family theory and research. This new model accounted for 40% of the variance in job satisfaction, 38% of the variance in family satisfaction, and 35% of the variance in life satisfaction. In a critical examination of work-family linkages, a series of analyses excluding work-family conflict constructs and pathways resulted in a well-fitting and more parsimonious model that still accounted for 39% of the variance in job satisfaction, 37% of the variance in family satisfaction, and 33% of the variance in life satisfaction. Results indicate that direct effects drive work-family conflict models while indirect effects provide little incremental explanation in regards to satisfaction outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60849117782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60849117782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.12.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:60849117782

VL - 74

SP - 199

EP - 218

JO - Journal of Vocational Behavior

JF - Journal of Vocational Behavior

SN - 0001-8791

IS - 2

ER -