A comparison of compressible and anelastic models of deep dry convection

Jonathan W. Smith, Peter R. Bannon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The response to an instantaneous diabatic warming and the resulting hydrostatic and geostrophic adjustment in compressible and anelastic models is examined. The comparison of the models includes examining the initial conditions, time evolution, potential vorticity, and both the traditional and available energetics. Between the two models, the buoyancy flow fields and potential vorticity perturbations are qualitatively and quantitatively similar. Traditional and available energetics can both be accurately conserved within the models. There are some short-lived (e.g., several minutes) differences in the model solutions as the compressible model undergoes an acoustic adjustment that contains vertically propagating acoustic waves and horizontally propagating Lamb waves. The acoustic waves are effectively eliminated in an upper-level numerical sponge layer using Rayleigh damping. Moreover, the relative computational efficiency and accuracy of the two models are assessed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4555-4571
Number of pages17
JournalMonthly Weather Review
Volume136
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

convection
acoustic wave
potential vorticity
energetics
comparison
hydrostatics
sponge
flow field
buoyancy
damping
acoustics
warming
perturbation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Smith, Jonathan W. ; Bannon, Peter R. / A comparison of compressible and anelastic models of deep dry convection. In: Monthly Weather Review. 2008 ; Vol. 136, No. 12. pp. 4555-4571.
@article{98fd99e4d4b84467b20dfcf69572bb5f,
title = "A comparison of compressible and anelastic models of deep dry convection",
abstract = "The response to an instantaneous diabatic warming and the resulting hydrostatic and geostrophic adjustment in compressible and anelastic models is examined. The comparison of the models includes examining the initial conditions, time evolution, potential vorticity, and both the traditional and available energetics. Between the two models, the buoyancy flow fields and potential vorticity perturbations are qualitatively and quantitatively similar. Traditional and available energetics can both be accurately conserved within the models. There are some short-lived (e.g., several minutes) differences in the model solutions as the compressible model undergoes an acoustic adjustment that contains vertically propagating acoustic waves and horizontally propagating Lamb waves. The acoustic waves are effectively eliminated in an upper-level numerical sponge layer using Rayleigh damping. Moreover, the relative computational efficiency and accuracy of the two models are assessed.",
author = "Smith, {Jonathan W.} and Bannon, {Peter R.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/2008MWR2343.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "4555--4571",
journal = "Monthly Weather Review",
issn = "0027-0644",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "12",

}

A comparison of compressible and anelastic models of deep dry convection. / Smith, Jonathan W.; Bannon, Peter R.

In: Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 136, No. 12, 01.12.2008, p. 4555-4571.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of compressible and anelastic models of deep dry convection

AU - Smith, Jonathan W.

AU - Bannon, Peter R.

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - The response to an instantaneous diabatic warming and the resulting hydrostatic and geostrophic adjustment in compressible and anelastic models is examined. The comparison of the models includes examining the initial conditions, time evolution, potential vorticity, and both the traditional and available energetics. Between the two models, the buoyancy flow fields and potential vorticity perturbations are qualitatively and quantitatively similar. Traditional and available energetics can both be accurately conserved within the models. There are some short-lived (e.g., several minutes) differences in the model solutions as the compressible model undergoes an acoustic adjustment that contains vertically propagating acoustic waves and horizontally propagating Lamb waves. The acoustic waves are effectively eliminated in an upper-level numerical sponge layer using Rayleigh damping. Moreover, the relative computational efficiency and accuracy of the two models are assessed.

AB - The response to an instantaneous diabatic warming and the resulting hydrostatic and geostrophic adjustment in compressible and anelastic models is examined. The comparison of the models includes examining the initial conditions, time evolution, potential vorticity, and both the traditional and available energetics. Between the two models, the buoyancy flow fields and potential vorticity perturbations are qualitatively and quantitatively similar. Traditional and available energetics can both be accurately conserved within the models. There are some short-lived (e.g., several minutes) differences in the model solutions as the compressible model undergoes an acoustic adjustment that contains vertically propagating acoustic waves and horizontally propagating Lamb waves. The acoustic waves are effectively eliminated in an upper-level numerical sponge layer using Rayleigh damping. Moreover, the relative computational efficiency and accuracy of the two models are assessed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64149113230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64149113230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/2008MWR2343.1

DO - 10.1175/2008MWR2343.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:64149113230

VL - 136

SP - 4555

EP - 4571

JO - Monthly Weather Review

JF - Monthly Weather Review

SN - 0027-0644

IS - 12

ER -