A comparison of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering facultys' progressions through the innovation-decision process

Stephanie Leigh Cutler, Maura Borrego, Michael Prince, Charles Henderson, Jeffrey Froyd

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research in Engineering Education has led to the development and dissemination of a number of different instructional strategies (such as active learning, problem based learning, and concept tests) contributing to greater student learning in the classroom. However, there is little research to demonstrate how Research Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) are being propagated from the developers to engineering faculty for use in the classroom. To examine the process of dissemination, this study uses Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation framework, which has traditionally been used to examine the dissemination of technological innovations through a population or organization. Rogers discusses five stages (knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation, and confirmation) of the innovation-decision process to explain how adopters make a decision about an innovation. To investigate faculty members' participation in the innovation-decision process, we conducted a survey of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering faculty (n = 221) teaching engineering sciences courses. The results show that ECE and ChE faculty members are located at a variety of stages throughout the innovation-decision process. However, most respondents have progressed past the knowledge phase; they are aware of the different RBIS. It is important to account for this when presenting an innovation or trying to encourage adoption of new practices, such as RBIS. It was found that workshops and presentations can influence the trial and use of RBIS when faculty are at the persuasion and decision stages. Also, women are more likely to try and use an RBIS than men. Many of the results found here are consistent with those found in a similar study done in physics education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2012 Frontiers in Education Conference: Soaring to New Heights in Engineering Education, FIE 2012 - Proceedings
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Event42nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2012 - Seattle, WA, United States
Duration: Oct 3 2012Oct 6 2012

Other

Other42nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2012
CountryUnited States
CitySeattle, WA
Period10/3/1210/6/12

Fingerprint

Chemical engineering
Innovation
engineering
innovation
persuasion
learning
classroom
engineering science
Engineering education
technical innovation
physics
education
Teaching
Physics
Education
Students
organization
participation
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Software
  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Cutler, S. L., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Henderson, C., & Froyd, J. (2012). A comparison of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering facultys' progressions through the innovation-decision process. In 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference: Soaring to New Heights in Engineering Education, FIE 2012 - Proceedings [6462405] https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462405
Cutler, Stephanie Leigh ; Borrego, Maura ; Prince, Michael ; Henderson, Charles ; Froyd, Jeffrey. / A comparison of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering facultys' progressions through the innovation-decision process. 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference: Soaring to New Heights in Engineering Education, FIE 2012 - Proceedings. 2012.
@inproceedings{94e7e62572b5431da1273d953edaf19b,
title = "A comparison of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering facultys' progressions through the innovation-decision process",
abstract = "Research in Engineering Education has led to the development and dissemination of a number of different instructional strategies (such as active learning, problem based learning, and concept tests) contributing to greater student learning in the classroom. However, there is little research to demonstrate how Research Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) are being propagated from the developers to engineering faculty for use in the classroom. To examine the process of dissemination, this study uses Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation framework, which has traditionally been used to examine the dissemination of technological innovations through a population or organization. Rogers discusses five stages (knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation, and confirmation) of the innovation-decision process to explain how adopters make a decision about an innovation. To investigate faculty members' participation in the innovation-decision process, we conducted a survey of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering faculty (n = 221) teaching engineering sciences courses. The results show that ECE and ChE faculty members are located at a variety of stages throughout the innovation-decision process. However, most respondents have progressed past the knowledge phase; they are aware of the different RBIS. It is important to account for this when presenting an innovation or trying to encourage adoption of new practices, such as RBIS. It was found that workshops and presentations can influence the trial and use of RBIS when faculty are at the persuasion and decision stages. Also, women are more likely to try and use an RBIS than men. Many of the results found here are consistent with those found in a similar study done in physics education.",
author = "Cutler, {Stephanie Leigh} and Maura Borrego and Michael Prince and Charles Henderson and Jeffrey Froyd",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1109/FIE.2012.6462405",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781467313513",
booktitle = "2012 Frontiers in Education Conference: Soaring to New Heights in Engineering Education, FIE 2012 - Proceedings",

}

Cutler, SL, Borrego, M, Prince, M, Henderson, C & Froyd, J 2012, A comparison of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering facultys' progressions through the innovation-decision process. in 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference: Soaring to New Heights in Engineering Education, FIE 2012 - Proceedings., 6462405, 42nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2012, Seattle, WA, United States, 10/3/12. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462405

A comparison of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering facultys' progressions through the innovation-decision process. / Cutler, Stephanie Leigh; Borrego, Maura; Prince, Michael; Henderson, Charles; Froyd, Jeffrey.

2012 Frontiers in Education Conference: Soaring to New Heights in Engineering Education, FIE 2012 - Proceedings. 2012. 6462405.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering facultys' progressions through the innovation-decision process

AU - Cutler, Stephanie Leigh

AU - Borrego, Maura

AU - Prince, Michael

AU - Henderson, Charles

AU - Froyd, Jeffrey

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Research in Engineering Education has led to the development and dissemination of a number of different instructional strategies (such as active learning, problem based learning, and concept tests) contributing to greater student learning in the classroom. However, there is little research to demonstrate how Research Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) are being propagated from the developers to engineering faculty for use in the classroom. To examine the process of dissemination, this study uses Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation framework, which has traditionally been used to examine the dissemination of technological innovations through a population or organization. Rogers discusses five stages (knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation, and confirmation) of the innovation-decision process to explain how adopters make a decision about an innovation. To investigate faculty members' participation in the innovation-decision process, we conducted a survey of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering faculty (n = 221) teaching engineering sciences courses. The results show that ECE and ChE faculty members are located at a variety of stages throughout the innovation-decision process. However, most respondents have progressed past the knowledge phase; they are aware of the different RBIS. It is important to account for this when presenting an innovation or trying to encourage adoption of new practices, such as RBIS. It was found that workshops and presentations can influence the trial and use of RBIS when faculty are at the persuasion and decision stages. Also, women are more likely to try and use an RBIS than men. Many of the results found here are consistent with those found in a similar study done in physics education.

AB - Research in Engineering Education has led to the development and dissemination of a number of different instructional strategies (such as active learning, problem based learning, and concept tests) contributing to greater student learning in the classroom. However, there is little research to demonstrate how Research Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) are being propagated from the developers to engineering faculty for use in the classroom. To examine the process of dissemination, this study uses Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation framework, which has traditionally been used to examine the dissemination of technological innovations through a population or organization. Rogers discusses five stages (knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation, and confirmation) of the innovation-decision process to explain how adopters make a decision about an innovation. To investigate faculty members' participation in the innovation-decision process, we conducted a survey of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering faculty (n = 221) teaching engineering sciences courses. The results show that ECE and ChE faculty members are located at a variety of stages throughout the innovation-decision process. However, most respondents have progressed past the knowledge phase; they are aware of the different RBIS. It is important to account for this when presenting an innovation or trying to encourage adoption of new practices, such as RBIS. It was found that workshops and presentations can influence the trial and use of RBIS when faculty are at the persuasion and decision stages. Also, women are more likely to try and use an RBIS than men. Many of the results found here are consistent with those found in a similar study done in physics education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874672320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874672320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/FIE.2012.6462405

DO - 10.1109/FIE.2012.6462405

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781467313513

BT - 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference: Soaring to New Heights in Engineering Education, FIE 2012 - Proceedings

ER -

Cutler SL, Borrego M, Prince M, Henderson C, Froyd J. A comparison of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering facultys' progressions through the innovation-decision process. In 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference: Soaring to New Heights in Engineering Education, FIE 2012 - Proceedings. 2012. 6462405 https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462405