A comparison of force and acoustic emission sensors in monitoring precision cylindrical grinding; Technical Digest

Eric Russell Marsh, Jeremiah A. Couey, Byron R. Knapp, R. R. Vallance

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Abstract

    Aerostatic spindles are used in precision grinding applications requiring high stiffness and very low error motions (5 to 25 nm). Forces generated during precision grinding are small and present challenges for accurate and reliable process monitoring. These challenges are met by incorporating non-contact displacement sensors into an aerostatic spindle that are calibrated to measure grinding forces from rotor motion. Four experiments compare this force-sensing approach to acoustic emission (AE) in detecting workpiece contact, process monitoring with small depths of cut, detecting workpiece defects, and evaluating abrasive wheel wear/loading. Results indicate that force measurements are preferable to acoustic emission in precision grinding since the force sensor offers improved contact sensitivity, higher resolution, and is capable of detecting events occurring within a single revolution of the grinding wheel.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationOptifab 2005
    Subtitle of host publicationTechnical Digest
    PublisherSPIE
    Pages47-49
    Number of pages3
    ISBN (Electronic)0819458252
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
    EventOptifab 2005: Technical Digest - Rochester, United States
    Duration: May 2 2005May 5 2005

    Publication series

    NameProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
    Volume10315
    ISSN (Print)0277-786X
    ISSN (Electronic)1996-756X

    Other

    OtherOptifab 2005: Technical Digest
    CountryUnited States
    CityRochester
    Period5/2/055/5/05

    Fingerprint

    Acoustic Emission
    Grinding wheels
    Grinding
    Process monitoring
    acoustic emission
    grinding
    Acoustic emissions
    Monitoring
    Sensor
    aerostatics
    Force measurement
    sensors
    Sensors
    spindles
    Process Monitoring
    wheels
    Rotors
    Wheel
    Stiffness
    Wear of materials

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
    • Condensed Matter Physics
    • Computer Science Applications
    • Applied Mathematics
    • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

    Cite this

    Marsh, E. R., Couey, J. A., Knapp, B. R., & Vallance, R. R. (2005). A comparison of force and acoustic emission sensors in monitoring precision cylindrical grinding; Technical Digest. In Optifab 2005: Technical Digest (pp. 47-49). [103150F] (Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering; Vol. 10315). SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.605545
    Marsh, Eric Russell ; Couey, Jeremiah A. ; Knapp, Byron R. ; Vallance, R. R. / A comparison of force and acoustic emission sensors in monitoring precision cylindrical grinding; Technical Digest. Optifab 2005: Technical Digest. SPIE, 2005. pp. 47-49 (Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering).
    @inproceedings{d10c8fd5bac34b61b6808585540ea987,
    title = "A comparison of force and acoustic emission sensors in monitoring precision cylindrical grinding; Technical Digest",
    abstract = "Aerostatic spindles are used in precision grinding applications requiring high stiffness and very low error motions (5 to 25 nm). Forces generated during precision grinding are small and present challenges for accurate and reliable process monitoring. These challenges are met by incorporating non-contact displacement sensors into an aerostatic spindle that are calibrated to measure grinding forces from rotor motion. Four experiments compare this force-sensing approach to acoustic emission (AE) in detecting workpiece contact, process monitoring with small depths of cut, detecting workpiece defects, and evaluating abrasive wheel wear/loading. Results indicate that force measurements are preferable to acoustic emission in precision grinding since the force sensor offers improved contact sensitivity, higher resolution, and is capable of detecting events occurring within a single revolution of the grinding wheel.",
    author = "Marsh, {Eric Russell} and Couey, {Jeremiah A.} and Knapp, {Byron R.} and Vallance, {R. R.}",
    year = "2005",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1117/12.605545",
    language = "English (US)",
    series = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",
    publisher = "SPIE",
    pages = "47--49",
    booktitle = "Optifab 2005",
    address = "United States",

    }

    Marsh, ER, Couey, JA, Knapp, BR & Vallance, RR 2005, A comparison of force and acoustic emission sensors in monitoring precision cylindrical grinding; Technical Digest. in Optifab 2005: Technical Digest., 103150F, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 10315, SPIE, pp. 47-49, Optifab 2005: Technical Digest, Rochester, United States, 5/2/05. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.605545

    A comparison of force and acoustic emission sensors in monitoring precision cylindrical grinding; Technical Digest. / Marsh, Eric Russell; Couey, Jeremiah A.; Knapp, Byron R.; Vallance, R. R.

    Optifab 2005: Technical Digest. SPIE, 2005. p. 47-49 103150F (Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering; Vol. 10315).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    TY - GEN

    T1 - A comparison of force and acoustic emission sensors in monitoring precision cylindrical grinding; Technical Digest

    AU - Marsh, Eric Russell

    AU - Couey, Jeremiah A.

    AU - Knapp, Byron R.

    AU - Vallance, R. R.

    PY - 2005/1/1

    Y1 - 2005/1/1

    N2 - Aerostatic spindles are used in precision grinding applications requiring high stiffness and very low error motions (5 to 25 nm). Forces generated during precision grinding are small and present challenges for accurate and reliable process monitoring. These challenges are met by incorporating non-contact displacement sensors into an aerostatic spindle that are calibrated to measure grinding forces from rotor motion. Four experiments compare this force-sensing approach to acoustic emission (AE) in detecting workpiece contact, process monitoring with small depths of cut, detecting workpiece defects, and evaluating abrasive wheel wear/loading. Results indicate that force measurements are preferable to acoustic emission in precision grinding since the force sensor offers improved contact sensitivity, higher resolution, and is capable of detecting events occurring within a single revolution of the grinding wheel.

    AB - Aerostatic spindles are used in precision grinding applications requiring high stiffness and very low error motions (5 to 25 nm). Forces generated during precision grinding are small and present challenges for accurate and reliable process monitoring. These challenges are met by incorporating non-contact displacement sensors into an aerostatic spindle that are calibrated to measure grinding forces from rotor motion. Four experiments compare this force-sensing approach to acoustic emission (AE) in detecting workpiece contact, process monitoring with small depths of cut, detecting workpiece defects, and evaluating abrasive wheel wear/loading. Results indicate that force measurements are preferable to acoustic emission in precision grinding since the force sensor offers improved contact sensitivity, higher resolution, and is capable of detecting events occurring within a single revolution of the grinding wheel.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038967859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038967859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1117/12.605545

    DO - 10.1117/12.605545

    M3 - Conference contribution

    T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

    SP - 47

    EP - 49

    BT - Optifab 2005

    PB - SPIE

    ER -

    Marsh ER, Couey JA, Knapp BR, Vallance RR. A comparison of force and acoustic emission sensors in monitoring precision cylindrical grinding; Technical Digest. In Optifab 2005: Technical Digest. SPIE. 2005. p. 47-49. 103150F. (Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.605545