A Comparison of Fourier Spectral Iterative Perturbation Method and Finite Element Method in Solving Phase-Field Equilibrium Equations

Pengcheng Song, Tiannan Yang, Yanzhou Ji, Zhuo Wang, Zhigang Yang, Longqing Chen, Lei Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper systematically compares the numerical implementation and computational cost between the Fourier spectral iterative perturbation method (FSIPM) and the finite element method (FEM) in solving partial differential equilibrium equations with inhomogeneous material coefficients and eigen-fields (e.g., stress-free strain and spontaneous electric polarization) involved in phase-field models. Four benchmark numerical examples, including inhomogeneous elastic, electrostatic, and steady-state heat conduction problems demonstrate that (1) the FSIPM rigorously requires uniform hexahedral (3D) and quadrilateral (2D) mesh and periodic boundary conditions for numerical implementation while the FEM permits arbitrary mesh and boundary conditions; (2) the FSIPM solutions are comparable to their FEM counterparts, and both of them agree with the analytic solutions, (3) the FSIPM is much faster in solving equilibrium equations than the FEM to achieve the accurate solutions, thus exhibiting a greater potential for large-scale 3D computations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1325-1349
Number of pages25
JournalCommunications in Computational Physics
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

equilibrium equations
finite element method
perturbation
mesh
boundary conditions
conductive heat transfer
stress distribution
electrostatics
costs
polarization
coefficients

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Song, Pengcheng ; Yang, Tiannan ; Ji, Yanzhou ; Wang, Zhuo ; Yang, Zhigang ; Chen, Longqing ; Chen, Lei. / A Comparison of Fourier Spectral Iterative Perturbation Method and Finite Element Method in Solving Phase-Field Equilibrium Equations. In: Communications in Computational Physics. 2017 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 1325-1349.
@article{6638ffa4b42947e9b1f800d2939d5ba6,
title = "A Comparison of Fourier Spectral Iterative Perturbation Method and Finite Element Method in Solving Phase-Field Equilibrium Equations",
abstract = "This paper systematically compares the numerical implementation and computational cost between the Fourier spectral iterative perturbation method (FSIPM) and the finite element method (FEM) in solving partial differential equilibrium equations with inhomogeneous material coefficients and eigen-fields (e.g., stress-free strain and spontaneous electric polarization) involved in phase-field models. Four benchmark numerical examples, including inhomogeneous elastic, electrostatic, and steady-state heat conduction problems demonstrate that (1) the FSIPM rigorously requires uniform hexahedral (3D) and quadrilateral (2D) mesh and periodic boundary conditions for numerical implementation while the FEM permits arbitrary mesh and boundary conditions; (2) the FSIPM solutions are comparable to their FEM counterparts, and both of them agree with the analytic solutions, (3) the FSIPM is much faster in solving equilibrium equations than the FEM to achieve the accurate solutions, thus exhibiting a greater potential for large-scale 3D computations.",
author = "Pengcheng Song and Tiannan Yang and Yanzhou Ji and Zhuo Wang and Zhigang Yang and Longqing Chen and Lei Chen",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4208/cicp.OA-2016-0114",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1325--1349",
journal = "Communications in Computational Physics",
issn = "1815-2406",
publisher = "Global Science Press",
number = "5",

}

A Comparison of Fourier Spectral Iterative Perturbation Method and Finite Element Method in Solving Phase-Field Equilibrium Equations. / Song, Pengcheng; Yang, Tiannan; Ji, Yanzhou; Wang, Zhuo; Yang, Zhigang; Chen, Longqing; Chen, Lei.

In: Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 21, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 1325-1349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Fourier Spectral Iterative Perturbation Method and Finite Element Method in Solving Phase-Field Equilibrium Equations

AU - Song, Pengcheng

AU - Yang, Tiannan

AU - Ji, Yanzhou

AU - Wang, Zhuo

AU - Yang, Zhigang

AU - Chen, Longqing

AU - Chen, Lei

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - This paper systematically compares the numerical implementation and computational cost between the Fourier spectral iterative perturbation method (FSIPM) and the finite element method (FEM) in solving partial differential equilibrium equations with inhomogeneous material coefficients and eigen-fields (e.g., stress-free strain and spontaneous electric polarization) involved in phase-field models. Four benchmark numerical examples, including inhomogeneous elastic, electrostatic, and steady-state heat conduction problems demonstrate that (1) the FSIPM rigorously requires uniform hexahedral (3D) and quadrilateral (2D) mesh and periodic boundary conditions for numerical implementation while the FEM permits arbitrary mesh and boundary conditions; (2) the FSIPM solutions are comparable to their FEM counterparts, and both of them agree with the analytic solutions, (3) the FSIPM is much faster in solving equilibrium equations than the FEM to achieve the accurate solutions, thus exhibiting a greater potential for large-scale 3D computations.

AB - This paper systematically compares the numerical implementation and computational cost between the Fourier spectral iterative perturbation method (FSIPM) and the finite element method (FEM) in solving partial differential equilibrium equations with inhomogeneous material coefficients and eigen-fields (e.g., stress-free strain and spontaneous electric polarization) involved in phase-field models. Four benchmark numerical examples, including inhomogeneous elastic, electrostatic, and steady-state heat conduction problems demonstrate that (1) the FSIPM rigorously requires uniform hexahedral (3D) and quadrilateral (2D) mesh and periodic boundary conditions for numerical implementation while the FEM permits arbitrary mesh and boundary conditions; (2) the FSIPM solutions are comparable to their FEM counterparts, and both of them agree with the analytic solutions, (3) the FSIPM is much faster in solving equilibrium equations than the FEM to achieve the accurate solutions, thus exhibiting a greater potential for large-scale 3D computations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016219247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016219247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4208/cicp.OA-2016-0114

DO - 10.4208/cicp.OA-2016-0114

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016219247

VL - 21

SP - 1325

EP - 1349

JO - Communications in Computational Physics

JF - Communications in Computational Physics

SN - 1815-2406

IS - 5

ER -