A comparison of Icare PRO and Tono-Pen XL tonometers in anesthetized children

Elliot C. McKee, Amanda L. Ely, Jared E. Duncan, Eniolami O. Dosunmu, Sharon F. Freedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Tonometry in the anesthetized child, vital for evaluating known or suspected glaucoma, remains limited to tonometers capable of supine recording. The Icare PRO measures intraocular pressure (IOP) in the sitting or supine patient. The purpose of this study was to compare Icare PRO and Tono-Pen tonometry during examination under anesthesia in eyes of supine children with normal eyes and glaucoma and/or corneal pathology. Methods In this prospective study of children undergoing examination under anesthesia, IOP was recorded in both eyes with Icare PRO and Tono-Pen immediately after mask anesthesia induction, with instrument order randomized. Results A total of 100 eyes of 50 children (median age, 58 months) were included. IOP range was 6-50 mm Hg by Icare PRO and 6-53 mm Hg by Tono-Pen. Mean IOP measured by Tono-Pen (18.9 ± 7.5) was higher than that measured by Icare PRO (16.7 ± 7.1 mm Hg) by 2.2 mm Hg (P < 0.001). The presence of corneal edema was associated with IOP measurements higher by Tono-Pen than by Icare PRO (mean difference, 8.4 mm Hg). When eyes with corneal edema were excluded from analysis, there was no correlation between central corneal thickness and the difference in IOP between the two instruments. Conclusions IOP in eyes of supine children under anesthesia measured approximately 2 mm Hg higher by Tono-Pen than Icare PRO and this difference was greater in eyes with frank corneal edema. Icare PRO may become a valuable tool for tonometry in supine infants and children, but a confirmatory test should be considered in eyes with corneal edema.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)332-337
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of AAPOS
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Intraocular Pressure
Corneal Edema
Manometry
Anesthesia
Glaucoma
Masks
Prospective Studies
Pathology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

McKee, Elliot C. ; Ely, Amanda L. ; Duncan, Jared E. ; Dosunmu, Eniolami O. ; Freedman, Sharon F. / A comparison of Icare PRO and Tono-Pen XL tonometers in anesthetized children. In: Journal of AAPOS. 2015 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 332-337.
@article{a343e79fe6e84b5a8016f7472bf38014,
title = "A comparison of Icare PRO and Tono-Pen XL tonometers in anesthetized children",
abstract = "Background Tonometry in the anesthetized child, vital for evaluating known or suspected glaucoma, remains limited to tonometers capable of supine recording. The Icare PRO measures intraocular pressure (IOP) in the sitting or supine patient. The purpose of this study was to compare Icare PRO and Tono-Pen tonometry during examination under anesthesia in eyes of supine children with normal eyes and glaucoma and/or corneal pathology. Methods In this prospective study of children undergoing examination under anesthesia, IOP was recorded in both eyes with Icare PRO and Tono-Pen immediately after mask anesthesia induction, with instrument order randomized. Results A total of 100 eyes of 50 children (median age, 58 months) were included. IOP range was 6-50 mm Hg by Icare PRO and 6-53 mm Hg by Tono-Pen. Mean IOP measured by Tono-Pen (18.9 ± 7.5) was higher than that measured by Icare PRO (16.7 ± 7.1 mm Hg) by 2.2 mm Hg (P < 0.001). The presence of corneal edema was associated with IOP measurements higher by Tono-Pen than by Icare PRO (mean difference, 8.4 mm Hg). When eyes with corneal edema were excluded from analysis, there was no correlation between central corneal thickness and the difference in IOP between the two instruments. Conclusions IOP in eyes of supine children under anesthesia measured approximately 2 mm Hg higher by Tono-Pen than Icare PRO and this difference was greater in eyes with frank corneal edema. Icare PRO may become a valuable tool for tonometry in supine infants and children, but a confirmatory test should be considered in eyes with corneal edema.",
author = "McKee, {Elliot C.} and Ely, {Amanda L.} and Duncan, {Jared E.} and Dosunmu, {Eniolami O.} and Freedman, {Sharon F.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.04.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "332--337",
journal = "Journal of AAPOS",
issn = "1091-8531",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

A comparison of Icare PRO and Tono-Pen XL tonometers in anesthetized children. / McKee, Elliot C.; Ely, Amanda L.; Duncan, Jared E.; Dosunmu, Eniolami O.; Freedman, Sharon F.

In: Journal of AAPOS, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.08.2015, p. 332-337.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of Icare PRO and Tono-Pen XL tonometers in anesthetized children

AU - McKee, Elliot C.

AU - Ely, Amanda L.

AU - Duncan, Jared E.

AU - Dosunmu, Eniolami O.

AU - Freedman, Sharon F.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Background Tonometry in the anesthetized child, vital for evaluating known or suspected glaucoma, remains limited to tonometers capable of supine recording. The Icare PRO measures intraocular pressure (IOP) in the sitting or supine patient. The purpose of this study was to compare Icare PRO and Tono-Pen tonometry during examination under anesthesia in eyes of supine children with normal eyes and glaucoma and/or corneal pathology. Methods In this prospective study of children undergoing examination under anesthesia, IOP was recorded in both eyes with Icare PRO and Tono-Pen immediately after mask anesthesia induction, with instrument order randomized. Results A total of 100 eyes of 50 children (median age, 58 months) were included. IOP range was 6-50 mm Hg by Icare PRO and 6-53 mm Hg by Tono-Pen. Mean IOP measured by Tono-Pen (18.9 ± 7.5) was higher than that measured by Icare PRO (16.7 ± 7.1 mm Hg) by 2.2 mm Hg (P < 0.001). The presence of corneal edema was associated with IOP measurements higher by Tono-Pen than by Icare PRO (mean difference, 8.4 mm Hg). When eyes with corneal edema were excluded from analysis, there was no correlation between central corneal thickness and the difference in IOP between the two instruments. Conclusions IOP in eyes of supine children under anesthesia measured approximately 2 mm Hg higher by Tono-Pen than Icare PRO and this difference was greater in eyes with frank corneal edema. Icare PRO may become a valuable tool for tonometry in supine infants and children, but a confirmatory test should be considered in eyes with corneal edema.

AB - Background Tonometry in the anesthetized child, vital for evaluating known or suspected glaucoma, remains limited to tonometers capable of supine recording. The Icare PRO measures intraocular pressure (IOP) in the sitting or supine patient. The purpose of this study was to compare Icare PRO and Tono-Pen tonometry during examination under anesthesia in eyes of supine children with normal eyes and glaucoma and/or corneal pathology. Methods In this prospective study of children undergoing examination under anesthesia, IOP was recorded in both eyes with Icare PRO and Tono-Pen immediately after mask anesthesia induction, with instrument order randomized. Results A total of 100 eyes of 50 children (median age, 58 months) were included. IOP range was 6-50 mm Hg by Icare PRO and 6-53 mm Hg by Tono-Pen. Mean IOP measured by Tono-Pen (18.9 ± 7.5) was higher than that measured by Icare PRO (16.7 ± 7.1 mm Hg) by 2.2 mm Hg (P < 0.001). The presence of corneal edema was associated with IOP measurements higher by Tono-Pen than by Icare PRO (mean difference, 8.4 mm Hg). When eyes with corneal edema were excluded from analysis, there was no correlation between central corneal thickness and the difference in IOP between the two instruments. Conclusions IOP in eyes of supine children under anesthesia measured approximately 2 mm Hg higher by Tono-Pen than Icare PRO and this difference was greater in eyes with frank corneal edema. Icare PRO may become a valuable tool for tonometry in supine infants and children, but a confirmatory test should be considered in eyes with corneal edema.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939654184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939654184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.04.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 26235790

AN - SCOPUS:84939654184

VL - 19

SP - 332

EP - 337

JO - Journal of AAPOS

JF - Journal of AAPOS

SN - 1091-8531

IS - 4

ER -