A comparison of reversal and multiprobe error separation

Eric Russell Marsh, David A. Arneson, Donald L. Martin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    55 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    This paper demonstrates the application of two methods of separating spindle error motion from artifact roundness on a spindle with <5 nm radial error. Two error separation methods, reversal and multiprobe, were each applied to data taken on two different test stands allowing direct comparison of the four combinations of hardware and separation algorithm. Because the theory of both separation methods is well documented, this work focuses on their implementation for nanometer-level measurements. As will be seen, a number of issues must be addressed to obtain repeatable results at this level of precision in spindle metrology. Ultimately, the results show that sub-nanometer features in both spindle error and artifact form can be reliably and repeatably resolved by both techniques.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)85-91
    Number of pages7
    JournalPrecision Engineering
    Volume34
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Engineering(all)

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of reversal and multiprobe error separation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this