A comparison of synoptic classification schemes based on ‘objective’ procedures

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Various ‘objective’ methods of classifying the atmospheric circulation are compared in order to determine whether the different methods result in similar groupings of circulation types, and also to examine the question of how much subjectivity is present in each of the typing schemes. The results indicate a high degree of subjectivity within each approach and that the different classification schemes do give rise to the production of different synoptic types. A method which groups days based on the sum of squares difference between cases (Kirchhofer method) gives the best overall classification, but only classifies 80 per cent of the days. A technique that clusters days based on principal component scores gives a larger mean sum of squares difference between the type patterns and the individual cases, but classifies all of the days.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-388
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Climatology
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1986

Fingerprint

atmospheric circulation
comparison
method

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{dab2d2f67355479189c422ab6c8345ea,
title = "A comparison of synoptic classification schemes based on ‘objective’ procedures",
abstract = "Various ‘objective’ methods of classifying the atmospheric circulation are compared in order to determine whether the different methods result in similar groupings of circulation types, and also to examine the question of how much subjectivity is present in each of the typing schemes. The results indicate a high degree of subjectivity within each approach and that the different classification schemes do give rise to the production of different synoptic types. A method which groups days based on the sum of squares difference between cases (Kirchhofer method) gives the best overall classification, but only classifies 80 per cent of the days. A technique that clusters days based on principal component scores gives a larger mean sum of squares difference between the type patterns and the individual cases, but classifies all of the days.",
author = "Jeff Key and Crane, {Robert George}",
year = "1986",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/joc.3370060404",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "375--388",
journal = "International Journal of Climatology",
issn = "0899-8418",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

A comparison of synoptic classification schemes based on ‘objective’ procedures. / Key, Jeff; Crane, Robert George.

In: Journal of Climatology, Vol. 6, No. 4, 01.01.1986, p. 375-388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of synoptic classification schemes based on ‘objective’ procedures

AU - Key, Jeff

AU - Crane, Robert George

PY - 1986/1/1

Y1 - 1986/1/1

N2 - Various ‘objective’ methods of classifying the atmospheric circulation are compared in order to determine whether the different methods result in similar groupings of circulation types, and also to examine the question of how much subjectivity is present in each of the typing schemes. The results indicate a high degree of subjectivity within each approach and that the different classification schemes do give rise to the production of different synoptic types. A method which groups days based on the sum of squares difference between cases (Kirchhofer method) gives the best overall classification, but only classifies 80 per cent of the days. A technique that clusters days based on principal component scores gives a larger mean sum of squares difference between the type patterns and the individual cases, but classifies all of the days.

AB - Various ‘objective’ methods of classifying the atmospheric circulation are compared in order to determine whether the different methods result in similar groupings of circulation types, and also to examine the question of how much subjectivity is present in each of the typing schemes. The results indicate a high degree of subjectivity within each approach and that the different classification schemes do give rise to the production of different synoptic types. A method which groups days based on the sum of squares difference between cases (Kirchhofer method) gives the best overall classification, but only classifies 80 per cent of the days. A technique that clusters days based on principal component scores gives a larger mean sum of squares difference between the type patterns and the individual cases, but classifies all of the days.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022825662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022825662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/joc.3370060404

DO - 10.1002/joc.3370060404

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0022825662

VL - 6

SP - 375

EP - 388

JO - International Journal of Climatology

JF - International Journal of Climatology

SN - 0899-8418

IS - 4

ER -