TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of the Health Star Rating system when used for restaurant fast foods and packaged foods
AU - Dunford, Elizabeth K.
AU - Wu, Jason H.Y.
AU - Wellard-Cole, Lyndal
AU - Watson, Wendy
AU - Crino, Michelle
AU - Petersen, Kristina
AU - Neal, Bruce
N1 - Funding Information:
Elizabeth Dunford is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship (APP1088673). Bruce Neal is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Principal Research Fellowship (APP1106947). He works within a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (APP1041020) and holds an NHMRC Program Grant (APP1052555).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - Background In June 2014, the Australian government agreed to the voluntary implementation of an interpretive ‘Health Star Rating’ (HSR) front-of-pack labelling system for packaged foods. The aim of the system is to make it easier for consumers to compare the healthiness of products based on number of stars. With many Australians consuming fast food there is a strong rationale for extending the HSR system to include fast food items. Objective To examine the performance of the HSR system when applied to fast foods. Design Nutrient content data for fast food menu items were collected from the websites of 13 large Australian fast-food chains. The HSR was calculated for each menu item. Statistics describing HSR values for fast foods were calculated and compared to results for comparable packaged foods. Results Data for 1529 fast food products were compared to data for 3810 packaged food products across 16 of 17 fast food product categories. The mean HSR for the fast foods was 2.5 and ranged from 0.5 to 5.0 and corresponding values for the comparator packaged foods were 2.6 and 0.5 to 5.0. Visual inspection of the data showed broadly comparable distributions of HSR values across the fast food and the packaged food categories, although statistically significant differences were apparent for seven categories (all p < 0.04). In some cases these differences reflected the large sample size and the power to detect small variations across fast foods and packaged food, and in others it appeared to reflect primarily differences in the mix of product types within a category. Conclusions These data support the idea that the HSR system could be extended to Australian fast foods. There are likely to be significant benefits to the community from the use of a single standardised signposting system for healthiness across all fresh, packaged and restaurant foods.
AB - Background In June 2014, the Australian government agreed to the voluntary implementation of an interpretive ‘Health Star Rating’ (HSR) front-of-pack labelling system for packaged foods. The aim of the system is to make it easier for consumers to compare the healthiness of products based on number of stars. With many Australians consuming fast food there is a strong rationale for extending the HSR system to include fast food items. Objective To examine the performance of the HSR system when applied to fast foods. Design Nutrient content data for fast food menu items were collected from the websites of 13 large Australian fast-food chains. The HSR was calculated for each menu item. Statistics describing HSR values for fast foods were calculated and compared to results for comparable packaged foods. Results Data for 1529 fast food products were compared to data for 3810 packaged food products across 16 of 17 fast food product categories. The mean HSR for the fast foods was 2.5 and ranged from 0.5 to 5.0 and corresponding values for the comparator packaged foods were 2.6 and 0.5 to 5.0. Visual inspection of the data showed broadly comparable distributions of HSR values across the fast food and the packaged food categories, although statistically significant differences were apparent for seven categories (all p < 0.04). In some cases these differences reflected the large sample size and the power to detect small variations across fast foods and packaged food, and in others it appeared to reflect primarily differences in the mix of product types within a category. Conclusions These data support the idea that the HSR system could be extended to Australian fast foods. There are likely to be significant benefits to the community from the use of a single standardised signposting system for healthiness across all fresh, packaged and restaurant foods.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020743131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020743131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.005
DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 28603059
AN - SCOPUS:85020743131
VL - 117
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Appetite
JF - Appetite
SN - 0195-6663
ER -