A Comparison of Two Interview Schedules: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime and the National Institute for Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule

Victor Hesselbrock, James Stabenau, Michie Hesselbrock, Peter Mirkin, Roger Meyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two structured interviews, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia—Lifetime (SADS-L) and the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule (NIMH-DIS), were compared as methods of reducing information variance in the diagnostic process. Forty-two patients newly admitted to an alcohol treatment unit were randomly selected and were independently interviewed using the SADS-L and NIMH-DIS. The order of the interviews was random and they were separated by three to four days. Interrater reliability for each interview schedule was calculated using the k statistic and was found to be high. The degree of diagnostic concordance between the two interview schedules for several diagnostic categories was also found to be high.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)674-677
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of General Psychiatry
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1982

Fingerprint

National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Mood Disorders
Schizophrenia
Appointments and Schedules
Interviews
Diagnostics
Mental Health
Affective
Alcohols

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{6f8bde1481e648259e44c9d000e64522,
title = "A Comparison of Two Interview Schedules: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime and the National Institute for Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule",
abstract = "Two structured interviews, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia—Lifetime (SADS-L) and the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule (NIMH-DIS), were compared as methods of reducing information variance in the diagnostic process. Forty-two patients newly admitted to an alcohol treatment unit were randomly selected and were independently interviewed using the SADS-L and NIMH-DIS. The order of the interviews was random and they were separated by three to four days. Interrater reliability for each interview schedule was calculated using the k statistic and was found to be high. The degree of diagnostic concordance between the two interview schedules for several diagnostic categories was also found to be high.",
author = "Victor Hesselbrock and James Stabenau and Michie Hesselbrock and Peter Mirkin and Roger Meyer",
year = "1982",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290060036007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "674--677",
journal = "JAMA Psychiatry",
issn = "2168-622X",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

A Comparison of Two Interview Schedules : The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime and the National Institute for Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. / Hesselbrock, Victor; Stabenau, James; Hesselbrock, Michie; Mirkin, Peter; Meyer, Roger.

In: Archives of General Psychiatry, Vol. 39, No. 6, 06.1982, p. 674-677.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Two Interview Schedules

T2 - The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime and the National Institute for Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule

AU - Hesselbrock, Victor

AU - Stabenau, James

AU - Hesselbrock, Michie

AU - Mirkin, Peter

AU - Meyer, Roger

PY - 1982/6

Y1 - 1982/6

N2 - Two structured interviews, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia—Lifetime (SADS-L) and the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule (NIMH-DIS), were compared as methods of reducing information variance in the diagnostic process. Forty-two patients newly admitted to an alcohol treatment unit were randomly selected and were independently interviewed using the SADS-L and NIMH-DIS. The order of the interviews was random and they were separated by three to four days. Interrater reliability for each interview schedule was calculated using the k statistic and was found to be high. The degree of diagnostic concordance between the two interview schedules for several diagnostic categories was also found to be high.

AB - Two structured interviews, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia—Lifetime (SADS-L) and the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule (NIMH-DIS), were compared as methods of reducing information variance in the diagnostic process. Forty-two patients newly admitted to an alcohol treatment unit were randomly selected and were independently interviewed using the SADS-L and NIMH-DIS. The order of the interviews was random and they were separated by three to four days. Interrater reliability for each interview schedule was calculated using the k statistic and was found to be high. The degree of diagnostic concordance between the two interview schedules for several diagnostic categories was also found to be high.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019982518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019982518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290060036007

DO - 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290060036007

M3 - Article

C2 - 7092500

AN - SCOPUS:0019982518

VL - 39

SP - 674

EP - 677

JO - JAMA Psychiatry

JF - JAMA Psychiatry

SN - 2168-622X

IS - 6

ER -