A comparison of visual and photographic estimates of weed biomass and weed control

C. Neeser, A. R. Martin, P. Juroszek, D. A. Mortensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the consistency and accuracy of visually estimated weed biomass and weed control data to data obtained through image analysis. Weed biomass and weed control were evaluated in soybean herbicide efficacy trials conducted at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln during 1992 and 1993. Measurements were based on visual estimates and on aerial. photographs taken at a height of 3.5 m above the soil surface. Photographs were digitized and classified, producing pixel values for broadleaf weeds, grass weeds, soybean, and soil. Percent weed cover was calculated in relation to the crop canopy, based on the respective number of pixels per image. Visual and photographic ratings of weed biomass and of weed control were not closely correlated. In the first year the visual method discriminated between more treatments than the photographic method, but the opposite occurred in the second year. The photographic method predicted yield more closely than the visual estimates. We concluded that visual estimates were less consistent and more subject to observer bias than measurements obtained with the photographic method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)586-590
Number of pages5
JournalWeed Technology
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of visual and photographic estimates of weed biomass and weed control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this