A Conditional Reasoning Measure for aggression

Lawrence R. James, Michael D. McIntyre, Charles A. Glisson, Phillip D. Green, Timothy W. Patton, James Marshall Lebreton, Brian C. Frost, Sara M. Russell, Chris J. Sablynski, Terence R. Mitchell, Larry J. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article describes a new approach for assessing cognitive precursors to aggression. Referred to as the Conditional Reasoning Measurement System, this procedure focuses on how people solve what on the surface appear to be traditional inductive reasoning problems. The true intent of the problems is to determine if solutions based on implicit biases (i.e., biases that operate below the surface of consciousness) are logically attractive to a respondent. The authors focus on the types of implicit biases that underlie aggressive individuals 'attempts to justify aggressive behavior. People who consistently select solutions based on these types of biases are scored as being potentially aggressive because they are cognitively prepared to rationalize aggression. Empirical tests of the conditional reasoning system are interpreted in terms of Ozer's criteria for ideal personality instruments. Noteworthy findings are that the system has acceptable psychometric properties and an average, uncorrected empirical validity of 0.44 against behavioral indicators of aggression (based on 11 studies).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-99
Number of pages31
JournalOrganizational Research Methods
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Aggression
Empirical test
Consciousness
Measurement system
Psychometrics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

James, L. R., McIntyre, M. D., Glisson, C. A., Green, P. D., Patton, T. W., Lebreton, J. M., ... Williams, L. J. (2005). A Conditional Reasoning Measure for aggression. Organizational Research Methods, 8(1), 69-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104272182
James, Lawrence R. ; McIntyre, Michael D. ; Glisson, Charles A. ; Green, Phillip D. ; Patton, Timothy W. ; Lebreton, James Marshall ; Frost, Brian C. ; Russell, Sara M. ; Sablynski, Chris J. ; Mitchell, Terence R. ; Williams, Larry J. / A Conditional Reasoning Measure for aggression. In: Organizational Research Methods. 2005 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 69-99.
@article{dc2e0a9d0ea14a82ae5630ac0afed617,
title = "A Conditional Reasoning Measure for aggression",
abstract = "This article describes a new approach for assessing cognitive precursors to aggression. Referred to as the Conditional Reasoning Measurement System, this procedure focuses on how people solve what on the surface appear to be traditional inductive reasoning problems. The true intent of the problems is to determine if solutions based on implicit biases (i.e., biases that operate below the surface of consciousness) are logically attractive to a respondent. The authors focus on the types of implicit biases that underlie aggressive individuals 'attempts to justify aggressive behavior. People who consistently select solutions based on these types of biases are scored as being potentially aggressive because they are cognitively prepared to rationalize aggression. Empirical tests of the conditional reasoning system are interpreted in terms of Ozer's criteria for ideal personality instruments. Noteworthy findings are that the system has acceptable psychometric properties and an average, uncorrected empirical validity of 0.44 against behavioral indicators of aggression (based on 11 studies).",
author = "James, {Lawrence R.} and McIntyre, {Michael D.} and Glisson, {Charles A.} and Green, {Phillip D.} and Patton, {Timothy W.} and Lebreton, {James Marshall} and Frost, {Brian C.} and Russell, {Sara M.} and Sablynski, {Chris J.} and Mitchell, {Terence R.} and Williams, {Larry J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1094428104272182",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "69--99",
journal = "Organizational Research Methods",
issn = "1094-4281",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

James, LR, McIntyre, MD, Glisson, CA, Green, PD, Patton, TW, Lebreton, JM, Frost, BC, Russell, SM, Sablynski, CJ, Mitchell, TR & Williams, LJ 2005, 'A Conditional Reasoning Measure for aggression', Organizational Research Methods, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104272182

A Conditional Reasoning Measure for aggression. / James, Lawrence R.; McIntyre, Michael D.; Glisson, Charles A.; Green, Phillip D.; Patton, Timothy W.; Lebreton, James Marshall; Frost, Brian C.; Russell, Sara M.; Sablynski, Chris J.; Mitchell, Terence R.; Williams, Larry J.

In: Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 69-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Conditional Reasoning Measure for aggression

AU - James, Lawrence R.

AU - McIntyre, Michael D.

AU - Glisson, Charles A.

AU - Green, Phillip D.

AU - Patton, Timothy W.

AU - Lebreton, James Marshall

AU - Frost, Brian C.

AU - Russell, Sara M.

AU - Sablynski, Chris J.

AU - Mitchell, Terence R.

AU - Williams, Larry J.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - This article describes a new approach for assessing cognitive precursors to aggression. Referred to as the Conditional Reasoning Measurement System, this procedure focuses on how people solve what on the surface appear to be traditional inductive reasoning problems. The true intent of the problems is to determine if solutions based on implicit biases (i.e., biases that operate below the surface of consciousness) are logically attractive to a respondent. The authors focus on the types of implicit biases that underlie aggressive individuals 'attempts to justify aggressive behavior. People who consistently select solutions based on these types of biases are scored as being potentially aggressive because they are cognitively prepared to rationalize aggression. Empirical tests of the conditional reasoning system are interpreted in terms of Ozer's criteria for ideal personality instruments. Noteworthy findings are that the system has acceptable psychometric properties and an average, uncorrected empirical validity of 0.44 against behavioral indicators of aggression (based on 11 studies).

AB - This article describes a new approach for assessing cognitive precursors to aggression. Referred to as the Conditional Reasoning Measurement System, this procedure focuses on how people solve what on the surface appear to be traditional inductive reasoning problems. The true intent of the problems is to determine if solutions based on implicit biases (i.e., biases that operate below the surface of consciousness) are logically attractive to a respondent. The authors focus on the types of implicit biases that underlie aggressive individuals 'attempts to justify aggressive behavior. People who consistently select solutions based on these types of biases are scored as being potentially aggressive because they are cognitively prepared to rationalize aggression. Empirical tests of the conditional reasoning system are interpreted in terms of Ozer's criteria for ideal personality instruments. Noteworthy findings are that the system has acceptable psychometric properties and an average, uncorrected empirical validity of 0.44 against behavioral indicators of aggression (based on 11 studies).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11344262344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=11344262344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1094428104272182

DO - 10.1177/1094428104272182

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:11344262344

VL - 8

SP - 69

EP - 99

JO - Organizational Research Methods

JF - Organizational Research Methods

SN - 1094-4281

IS - 1

ER -

James LR, McIntyre MD, Glisson CA, Green PD, Patton TW, Lebreton JM et al. A Conditional Reasoning Measure for aggression. Organizational Research Methods. 2005 Jan 1;8(1):69-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104272182