A constrained least-squares approach to combine bottom-up and top-down CO2 flux estimates

Daniel Cooley, F. Jay Breidt, Stephen M. Ogle, Andrew E. Schuh, Thomas Lauvaux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Terrestrial CO2 flux estimates are obtained from two fundamentally different methods generally termed bottom-up and top-down approaches. Inventory methods are one type of bottom-up approach which uses various sources of information such as crop production surveys and forest monitoring data to estimate the annual CO2 flux at locations covering a study region. Top-down approaches are various types of atmospheric inversion methods which use CO2 concentration measurements from monitoring towers and atmospheric transport models to estimate CO2 flux over a study region. Both methods can also quantify the uncertainty associated with their estimates. Historically, these two approaches have produced estimates that differ considerably. The goal of this work is to construct a statistical model which sensibly combines estimates from the two approaches to produce a new estimate of CO2 flux for our study region. The two approaches have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and our results show that certain aspects of the uncertainty associated with each of the approaches are greatly reduced by combining the methods. Our model is purposefully simple and designed to take the two approaches' estimates and measures of uncertainty at 'face value'. Specifically, we use a constrained least-squares approach to appropriately weigh the estimates by the inverse of their variance, and the constraint imposes agreement between the two sources. Our application involves nearly 18,000 flux estimates for the upper midwest United States. The constrained dependencies result in a non-sparse covariance matrix, but computation requires only minutes due to the structure of the model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-146
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironmental and Ecological Statistics
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Constrained Least Squares
Bottom-up
Estimate
top-down approach
bottom-up approach
Uncertainty
atmospheric transport
crop production
Top-down
Least squares
Co2
Monitoring
Matrix Computation
method
matrix
Statistical Model
Covariance matrix
Annual
monitoring
Inversion

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this

Cooley, Daniel ; Breidt, F. Jay ; Ogle, Stephen M. ; Schuh, Andrew E. ; Lauvaux, Thomas. / A constrained least-squares approach to combine bottom-up and top-down CO2 flux estimates. In: Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 2013 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 129-146.
@article{1989652f3def410d889cf002b1e548d5,
title = "A constrained least-squares approach to combine bottom-up and top-down CO2 flux estimates",
abstract = "Terrestrial CO2 flux estimates are obtained from two fundamentally different methods generally termed bottom-up and top-down approaches. Inventory methods are one type of bottom-up approach which uses various sources of information such as crop production surveys and forest monitoring data to estimate the annual CO2 flux at locations covering a study region. Top-down approaches are various types of atmospheric inversion methods which use CO2 concentration measurements from monitoring towers and atmospheric transport models to estimate CO2 flux over a study region. Both methods can also quantify the uncertainty associated with their estimates. Historically, these two approaches have produced estimates that differ considerably. The goal of this work is to construct a statistical model which sensibly combines estimates from the two approaches to produce a new estimate of CO2 flux for our study region. The two approaches have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and our results show that certain aspects of the uncertainty associated with each of the approaches are greatly reduced by combining the methods. Our model is purposefully simple and designed to take the two approaches' estimates and measures of uncertainty at 'face value'. Specifically, we use a constrained least-squares approach to appropriately weigh the estimates by the inverse of their variance, and the constraint imposes agreement between the two sources. Our application involves nearly 18,000 flux estimates for the upper midwest United States. The constrained dependencies result in a non-sparse covariance matrix, but computation requires only minutes due to the structure of the model.",
author = "Daniel Cooley and Breidt, {F. Jay} and Ogle, {Stephen M.} and Schuh, {Andrew E.} and Thomas Lauvaux",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10651-012-0211-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "129--146",
journal = "Environmental and Ecological Statistics",
issn = "1352-8505",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

A constrained least-squares approach to combine bottom-up and top-down CO2 flux estimates. / Cooley, Daniel; Breidt, F. Jay; Ogle, Stephen M.; Schuh, Andrew E.; Lauvaux, Thomas.

In: Environmental and Ecological Statistics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 129-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A constrained least-squares approach to combine bottom-up and top-down CO2 flux estimates

AU - Cooley, Daniel

AU - Breidt, F. Jay

AU - Ogle, Stephen M.

AU - Schuh, Andrew E.

AU - Lauvaux, Thomas

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Terrestrial CO2 flux estimates are obtained from two fundamentally different methods generally termed bottom-up and top-down approaches. Inventory methods are one type of bottom-up approach which uses various sources of information such as crop production surveys and forest monitoring data to estimate the annual CO2 flux at locations covering a study region. Top-down approaches are various types of atmospheric inversion methods which use CO2 concentration measurements from monitoring towers and atmospheric transport models to estimate CO2 flux over a study region. Both methods can also quantify the uncertainty associated with their estimates. Historically, these two approaches have produced estimates that differ considerably. The goal of this work is to construct a statistical model which sensibly combines estimates from the two approaches to produce a new estimate of CO2 flux for our study region. The two approaches have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and our results show that certain aspects of the uncertainty associated with each of the approaches are greatly reduced by combining the methods. Our model is purposefully simple and designed to take the two approaches' estimates and measures of uncertainty at 'face value'. Specifically, we use a constrained least-squares approach to appropriately weigh the estimates by the inverse of their variance, and the constraint imposes agreement between the two sources. Our application involves nearly 18,000 flux estimates for the upper midwest United States. The constrained dependencies result in a non-sparse covariance matrix, but computation requires only minutes due to the structure of the model.

AB - Terrestrial CO2 flux estimates are obtained from two fundamentally different methods generally termed bottom-up and top-down approaches. Inventory methods are one type of bottom-up approach which uses various sources of information such as crop production surveys and forest monitoring data to estimate the annual CO2 flux at locations covering a study region. Top-down approaches are various types of atmospheric inversion methods which use CO2 concentration measurements from monitoring towers and atmospheric transport models to estimate CO2 flux over a study region. Both methods can also quantify the uncertainty associated with their estimates. Historically, these two approaches have produced estimates that differ considerably. The goal of this work is to construct a statistical model which sensibly combines estimates from the two approaches to produce a new estimate of CO2 flux for our study region. The two approaches have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and our results show that certain aspects of the uncertainty associated with each of the approaches are greatly reduced by combining the methods. Our model is purposefully simple and designed to take the two approaches' estimates and measures of uncertainty at 'face value'. Specifically, we use a constrained least-squares approach to appropriately weigh the estimates by the inverse of their variance, and the constraint imposes agreement between the two sources. Our application involves nearly 18,000 flux estimates for the upper midwest United States. The constrained dependencies result in a non-sparse covariance matrix, but computation requires only minutes due to the structure of the model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874815217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874815217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10651-012-0211-6

DO - 10.1007/s10651-012-0211-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84874815217

VL - 20

SP - 129

EP - 146

JO - Environmental and Ecological Statistics

JF - Environmental and Ecological Statistics

SN - 1352-8505

IS - 1

ER -