A critique of dyadic design

Skyler J. Cranmer, Bruce A. Desmarais, Jr.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dyadic research designs concern data that comprise interactions among actors. They are, without a doubt, the most frequent designs employed in the empirical analysis of international politics. But what do such designs carry with them in terms of theoretical claims and statistical problems? These two issues closely intertwine. When testing hypotheses empirically, the statistical model must be a careful operationalization of the theory under consideration. Given that the theoretical and statistical cannot be separated, we discuss dyadic research designs from these two perspectives. We highlight problems of model misspecification, erroneous assumptions about the independence of events, artificial levels of analysis, and the incoherent treatment of multilateral/ multiparty events on the theoretical side. On the statistical side, we stress difficult-to-escape challenges to valid inference.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)355-362
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Studies Quarterly
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

research planning
event
hypothesis testing
International Politics
operationalization
interaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Cranmer, Skyler J. ; Desmarais, Jr., Bruce A. / A critique of dyadic design. In: International Studies Quarterly. 2016 ; Vol. 60, No. 2. pp. 355-362.
@article{5c919ace32e34b6695f9451644c6c5be,
title = "A critique of dyadic design",
abstract = "Dyadic research designs concern data that comprise interactions among actors. They are, without a doubt, the most frequent designs employed in the empirical analysis of international politics. But what do such designs carry with them in terms of theoretical claims and statistical problems? These two issues closely intertwine. When testing hypotheses empirically, the statistical model must be a careful operationalization of the theory under consideration. Given that the theoretical and statistical cannot be separated, we discuss dyadic research designs from these two perspectives. We highlight problems of model misspecification, erroneous assumptions about the independence of events, artificial levels of analysis, and the incoherent treatment of multilateral/ multiparty events on the theoretical side. On the statistical side, we stress difficult-to-escape challenges to valid inference.",
author = "Cranmer, {Skyler J.} and {Desmarais, Jr.}, {Bruce A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/isq/sqw007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "355--362",
journal = "International Studies Quarterly",
issn = "0020-8833",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

A critique of dyadic design. / Cranmer, Skyler J.; Desmarais, Jr., Bruce A.

In: International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 60, No. 2, 01.06.2016, p. 355-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critique of dyadic design

AU - Cranmer, Skyler J.

AU - Desmarais, Jr., Bruce A.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Dyadic research designs concern data that comprise interactions among actors. They are, without a doubt, the most frequent designs employed in the empirical analysis of international politics. But what do such designs carry with them in terms of theoretical claims and statistical problems? These two issues closely intertwine. When testing hypotheses empirically, the statistical model must be a careful operationalization of the theory under consideration. Given that the theoretical and statistical cannot be separated, we discuss dyadic research designs from these two perspectives. We highlight problems of model misspecification, erroneous assumptions about the independence of events, artificial levels of analysis, and the incoherent treatment of multilateral/ multiparty events on the theoretical side. On the statistical side, we stress difficult-to-escape challenges to valid inference.

AB - Dyadic research designs concern data that comprise interactions among actors. They are, without a doubt, the most frequent designs employed in the empirical analysis of international politics. But what do such designs carry with them in terms of theoretical claims and statistical problems? These two issues closely intertwine. When testing hypotheses empirically, the statistical model must be a careful operationalization of the theory under consideration. Given that the theoretical and statistical cannot be separated, we discuss dyadic research designs from these two perspectives. We highlight problems of model misspecification, erroneous assumptions about the independence of events, artificial levels of analysis, and the incoherent treatment of multilateral/ multiparty events on the theoretical side. On the statistical side, we stress difficult-to-escape challenges to valid inference.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977532960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977532960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/isq/sqw007

DO - 10.1093/isq/sqw007

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 355

EP - 362

JO - International Studies Quarterly

JF - International Studies Quarterly

SN - 0020-8833

IS - 2

ER -