A critique of master sintering curve analysis

T. Frueh, I. O. Ozer, S. F. Poterala, H. Lee, E. R. Kupp, C. Compson, J. Atria, G. L. Messing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this work, we explore factors affecting the accuracy of the master sintering curve (MSC) approach for analyzing the complete sintering profile of ceramic powders. We show that the instantaneous anisotropic shrinkage must be accounted for to develop an accurate MSC. The MSC diverges at >90% density because of basic assumptions that oversimplify the analysis of the densification process. We also show that powder chemistry and forming techniques can affect the fitting parameter Q. Q should not be interpreted as the sintering activation energy, or used to interpret mechanistic differences since it is comprised of several mechanisms that influence densification throughout the sintering cycle. Despite these limitations, the MSC is a useful and practical tool for predicting thermal load (i.e. time and temperature) effects on the densification of a ceramic part fabricated from a singular powder that is fabricated by a singular forming process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1030-1037
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the European Ceramic Society
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Sintering
Densification
Powders
Thermal load
Thermal effects
Activation energy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Materials Chemistry

Cite this

Frueh, T. ; Ozer, I. O. ; Poterala, S. F. ; Lee, H. ; Kupp, E. R. ; Compson, C. ; Atria, J. ; Messing, G. L. / A critique of master sintering curve analysis. In: Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2018 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 1030-1037.
@article{bfd3a504970c4517b7e34110c5367c7b,
title = "A critique of master sintering curve analysis",
abstract = "In this work, we explore factors affecting the accuracy of the master sintering curve (MSC) approach for analyzing the complete sintering profile of ceramic powders. We show that the instantaneous anisotropic shrinkage must be accounted for to develop an accurate MSC. The MSC diverges at >90{\%} density because of basic assumptions that oversimplify the analysis of the densification process. We also show that powder chemistry and forming techniques can affect the fitting parameter Q. Q should not be interpreted as the sintering activation energy, or used to interpret mechanistic differences since it is comprised of several mechanisms that influence densification throughout the sintering cycle. Despite these limitations, the MSC is a useful and practical tool for predicting thermal load (i.e. time and temperature) effects on the densification of a ceramic part fabricated from a singular powder that is fabricated by a singular forming process.",
author = "T. Frueh and Ozer, {I. O.} and Poterala, {S. F.} and H. Lee and Kupp, {E. R.} and C. Compson and J. Atria and Messing, {G. L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.12.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1030--1037",
journal = "Journal of the European Ceramic Society",
issn = "0955-2219",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

Frueh, T, Ozer, IO, Poterala, SF, Lee, H, Kupp, ER, Compson, C, Atria, J & Messing, GL 2018, 'A critique of master sintering curve analysis', Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1030-1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.12.025

A critique of master sintering curve analysis. / Frueh, T.; Ozer, I. O.; Poterala, S. F.; Lee, H.; Kupp, E. R.; Compson, C.; Atria, J.; Messing, G. L.

In: Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Vol. 38, No. 4, 04.2018, p. 1030-1037.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critique of master sintering curve analysis

AU - Frueh, T.

AU - Ozer, I. O.

AU - Poterala, S. F.

AU - Lee, H.

AU - Kupp, E. R.

AU - Compson, C.

AU - Atria, J.

AU - Messing, G. L.

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - In this work, we explore factors affecting the accuracy of the master sintering curve (MSC) approach for analyzing the complete sintering profile of ceramic powders. We show that the instantaneous anisotropic shrinkage must be accounted for to develop an accurate MSC. The MSC diverges at >90% density because of basic assumptions that oversimplify the analysis of the densification process. We also show that powder chemistry and forming techniques can affect the fitting parameter Q. Q should not be interpreted as the sintering activation energy, or used to interpret mechanistic differences since it is comprised of several mechanisms that influence densification throughout the sintering cycle. Despite these limitations, the MSC is a useful and practical tool for predicting thermal load (i.e. time and temperature) effects on the densification of a ceramic part fabricated from a singular powder that is fabricated by a singular forming process.

AB - In this work, we explore factors affecting the accuracy of the master sintering curve (MSC) approach for analyzing the complete sintering profile of ceramic powders. We show that the instantaneous anisotropic shrinkage must be accounted for to develop an accurate MSC. The MSC diverges at >90% density because of basic assumptions that oversimplify the analysis of the densification process. We also show that powder chemistry and forming techniques can affect the fitting parameter Q. Q should not be interpreted as the sintering activation energy, or used to interpret mechanistic differences since it is comprised of several mechanisms that influence densification throughout the sintering cycle. Despite these limitations, the MSC is a useful and practical tool for predicting thermal load (i.e. time and temperature) effects on the densification of a ceramic part fabricated from a singular powder that is fabricated by a singular forming process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039765068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039765068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.12.025

DO - 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.12.025

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85039765068

VL - 38

SP - 1030

EP - 1037

JO - Journal of the European Ceramic Society

JF - Journal of the European Ceramic Society

SN - 0955-2219

IS - 4

ER -