A Data Analysis Method for Using Longitudinal Binary Outcome Data from a SMART to Compare Adaptive Interventions

John Dziak, Jamie R.T. Yap, Daniel Almirall, James R. McKay, Kevin G. Lynch, Inbal Nahum-Shani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) are a useful and increasingly popular approach for gathering information to inform the construction of adaptive interventions to treat psychological and behavioral health conditions. Until recently, analysis methods for data from SMART designs considered only a single measurement of the outcome of interest when comparing the efficacy of adaptive interventions. Lu et al. proposed a method for considering repeated outcome measurements to incorporate information about the longitudinal trajectory of change. While their proposed method can be applied to many kinds of outcome variables, they focused mainly on linear models for normally distributed outcomes. Practical guidelines and extensions are required to implement this methodology with other types of repeated outcome measures common in behavioral research. In this article, we discuss implementation of this method with repeated binary outcomes. We explain how to compare adaptive interventions in terms of various summaries of repeated binary outcome measures, including average outcome (area under the curve) and delayed effects. The method is illustrated using an empirical example from a SMART study to develop an adaptive intervention for engaging alcohol- and cocaine-dependent patients in treatment. Monte Carlo simulations are provided to demonstrate the good performance of the proposed technique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)613-636
Number of pages24
JournalMultivariate Behavioral Research
Volume54
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2019

Fingerprint

Binary Outcomes
Randomized Trial
Data analysis
Assignment
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Behavioral Research
Cocaine
Area Under Curve
Alcohol
Linear Models
Alcohols
Efficacy
Guidelines
Linear Model
Psychology
Health
Monte Carlo Simulation
Trajectory
Curve
Methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Dziak, John ; Yap, Jamie R.T. ; Almirall, Daniel ; McKay, James R. ; Lynch, Kevin G. ; Nahum-Shani, Inbal. / A Data Analysis Method for Using Longitudinal Binary Outcome Data from a SMART to Compare Adaptive Interventions. In: Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2019 ; Vol. 54, No. 5. pp. 613-636.
@article{b24047ec8a504a7184f93253af7cc848,
title = "A Data Analysis Method for Using Longitudinal Binary Outcome Data from a SMART to Compare Adaptive Interventions",
abstract = "Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) are a useful and increasingly popular approach for gathering information to inform the construction of adaptive interventions to treat psychological and behavioral health conditions. Until recently, analysis methods for data from SMART designs considered only a single measurement of the outcome of interest when comparing the efficacy of adaptive interventions. Lu et al. proposed a method for considering repeated outcome measurements to incorporate information about the longitudinal trajectory of change. While their proposed method can be applied to many kinds of outcome variables, they focused mainly on linear models for normally distributed outcomes. Practical guidelines and extensions are required to implement this methodology with other types of repeated outcome measures common in behavioral research. In this article, we discuss implementation of this method with repeated binary outcomes. We explain how to compare adaptive interventions in terms of various summaries of repeated binary outcome measures, including average outcome (area under the curve) and delayed effects. The method is illustrated using an empirical example from a SMART study to develop an adaptive intervention for engaging alcohol- and cocaine-dependent patients in treatment. Monte Carlo simulations are provided to demonstrate the good performance of the proposed technique.",
author = "John Dziak and Yap, {Jamie R.T.} and Daniel Almirall and McKay, {James R.} and Lynch, {Kevin G.} and Inbal Nahum-Shani",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/00273171.2018.1558042",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "613--636",
journal = "Multivariate Behavioral Research",
issn = "0027-3171",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5",

}

A Data Analysis Method for Using Longitudinal Binary Outcome Data from a SMART to Compare Adaptive Interventions. / Dziak, John; Yap, Jamie R.T.; Almirall, Daniel; McKay, James R.; Lynch, Kevin G.; Nahum-Shani, Inbal.

In: Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 54, No. 5, 03.09.2019, p. 613-636.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Data Analysis Method for Using Longitudinal Binary Outcome Data from a SMART to Compare Adaptive Interventions

AU - Dziak, John

AU - Yap, Jamie R.T.

AU - Almirall, Daniel

AU - McKay, James R.

AU - Lynch, Kevin G.

AU - Nahum-Shani, Inbal

PY - 2019/9/3

Y1 - 2019/9/3

N2 - Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) are a useful and increasingly popular approach for gathering information to inform the construction of adaptive interventions to treat psychological and behavioral health conditions. Until recently, analysis methods for data from SMART designs considered only a single measurement of the outcome of interest when comparing the efficacy of adaptive interventions. Lu et al. proposed a method for considering repeated outcome measurements to incorporate information about the longitudinal trajectory of change. While their proposed method can be applied to many kinds of outcome variables, they focused mainly on linear models for normally distributed outcomes. Practical guidelines and extensions are required to implement this methodology with other types of repeated outcome measures common in behavioral research. In this article, we discuss implementation of this method with repeated binary outcomes. We explain how to compare adaptive interventions in terms of various summaries of repeated binary outcome measures, including average outcome (area under the curve) and delayed effects. The method is illustrated using an empirical example from a SMART study to develop an adaptive intervention for engaging alcohol- and cocaine-dependent patients in treatment. Monte Carlo simulations are provided to demonstrate the good performance of the proposed technique.

AB - Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) are a useful and increasingly popular approach for gathering information to inform the construction of adaptive interventions to treat psychological and behavioral health conditions. Until recently, analysis methods for data from SMART designs considered only a single measurement of the outcome of interest when comparing the efficacy of adaptive interventions. Lu et al. proposed a method for considering repeated outcome measurements to incorporate information about the longitudinal trajectory of change. While their proposed method can be applied to many kinds of outcome variables, they focused mainly on linear models for normally distributed outcomes. Practical guidelines and extensions are required to implement this methodology with other types of repeated outcome measures common in behavioral research. In this article, we discuss implementation of this method with repeated binary outcomes. We explain how to compare adaptive interventions in terms of various summaries of repeated binary outcome measures, including average outcome (area under the curve) and delayed effects. The method is illustrated using an empirical example from a SMART study to develop an adaptive intervention for engaging alcohol- and cocaine-dependent patients in treatment. Monte Carlo simulations are provided to demonstrate the good performance of the proposed technique.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060334330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060334330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00273171.2018.1558042

DO - 10.1080/00273171.2018.1558042

M3 - Article

C2 - 30663401

AN - SCOPUS:85060334330

VL - 54

SP - 613

EP - 636

JO - Multivariate Behavioral Research

JF - Multivariate Behavioral Research

SN - 0027-3171

IS - 5

ER -