A dynamic-pulse pseudo-pressure method to determine shale matrix permeability at representative reservoir conditions

Kunkun Fan, Mingzhe Dong, Derek Elsworth, Yajun Li, Congbin Yin, Yanchao Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Matrix permeability is a key factor in determining long term gas production from shale reservoirs – requiring that it is determined under true reservoir conditions. We suggest a variable pressure gradient (VPG) protocol to measure shale matrix permeability using real reservoir fluids in powdered samples. The VPG method is described and a mathematical protocol for its analysis is developed. The first measures gas fractional production rate history under constant external pressure for each production stage and with a designated pressure gradient. The second establishes the mathematical protocol for analysis using pseudo-pressure to accommodate both the effect of gas pressure-dependent PVT parameters and desorption rate coefficient. The matrix permeability is determined by matching the solution of the model with the experimental data. The model fits the experimental data well when the fractional production is <0.75. Shale matrix permeability is calculated in the order of magnitude of 10−7–10−6 md. Methane permeability decreases with a decrease in both average pore pressure and particle size of the individual component grains. Permeability considerably more sensitive to changes in desorption rate coefficient than flow regimes. Compared with current small pressure gradient (SPG) methods, the VPG method is considerably more applicable to actual gas production and reduces to the SPG method under simplified boundary conditions. Although some approximate treatments are used for establishing the VPG method and some flow mechanisms are not considered, this study still provides an information-rich technique to determine shale matrix permeability at conditions close to reality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-72
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Coal Geology
Volume193
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Shale
Pressure gradient
pressure gradient
Gradient methods
shale
permeability
matrix
Gases
gas production
Desorption
desorption
Pore pressure
method
gas
pore pressure
Methane
boundary condition
methane
Particle size
particle size

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Fuel Technology
  • Geology
  • Economic Geology
  • Stratigraphy

Cite this

@article{4ac644a32e1f40279b503e183d106b96,
title = "A dynamic-pulse pseudo-pressure method to determine shale matrix permeability at representative reservoir conditions",
abstract = "Matrix permeability is a key factor in determining long term gas production from shale reservoirs – requiring that it is determined under true reservoir conditions. We suggest a variable pressure gradient (VPG) protocol to measure shale matrix permeability using real reservoir fluids in powdered samples. The VPG method is described and a mathematical protocol for its analysis is developed. The first measures gas fractional production rate history under constant external pressure for each production stage and with a designated pressure gradient. The second establishes the mathematical protocol for analysis using pseudo-pressure to accommodate both the effect of gas pressure-dependent PVT parameters and desorption rate coefficient. The matrix permeability is determined by matching the solution of the model with the experimental data. The model fits the experimental data well when the fractional production is <0.75. Shale matrix permeability is calculated in the order of magnitude of 10−7–10−6 md. Methane permeability decreases with a decrease in both average pore pressure and particle size of the individual component grains. Permeability considerably more sensitive to changes in desorption rate coefficient than flow regimes. Compared with current small pressure gradient (SPG) methods, the VPG method is considerably more applicable to actual gas production and reduces to the SPG method under simplified boundary conditions. Although some approximate treatments are used for establishing the VPG method and some flow mechanisms are not considered, this study still provides an information-rich technique to determine shale matrix permeability at conditions close to reality.",
author = "Kunkun Fan and Mingzhe Dong and Derek Elsworth and Yajun Li and Congbin Yin and Yanchao Li",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.coal.2018.04.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "193",
pages = "61--72",
journal = "International Journal of Coal Geology",
issn = "0166-5162",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A dynamic-pulse pseudo-pressure method to determine shale matrix permeability at representative reservoir conditions. / Fan, Kunkun; Dong, Mingzhe; Elsworth, Derek; Li, Yajun; Yin, Congbin; Li, Yanchao.

In: International Journal of Coal Geology, Vol. 193, 01.06.2018, p. 61-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A dynamic-pulse pseudo-pressure method to determine shale matrix permeability at representative reservoir conditions

AU - Fan, Kunkun

AU - Dong, Mingzhe

AU - Elsworth, Derek

AU - Li, Yajun

AU - Yin, Congbin

AU - Li, Yanchao

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Matrix permeability is a key factor in determining long term gas production from shale reservoirs – requiring that it is determined under true reservoir conditions. We suggest a variable pressure gradient (VPG) protocol to measure shale matrix permeability using real reservoir fluids in powdered samples. The VPG method is described and a mathematical protocol for its analysis is developed. The first measures gas fractional production rate history under constant external pressure for each production stage and with a designated pressure gradient. The second establishes the mathematical protocol for analysis using pseudo-pressure to accommodate both the effect of gas pressure-dependent PVT parameters and desorption rate coefficient. The matrix permeability is determined by matching the solution of the model with the experimental data. The model fits the experimental data well when the fractional production is <0.75. Shale matrix permeability is calculated in the order of magnitude of 10−7–10−6 md. Methane permeability decreases with a decrease in both average pore pressure and particle size of the individual component grains. Permeability considerably more sensitive to changes in desorption rate coefficient than flow regimes. Compared with current small pressure gradient (SPG) methods, the VPG method is considerably more applicable to actual gas production and reduces to the SPG method under simplified boundary conditions. Although some approximate treatments are used for establishing the VPG method and some flow mechanisms are not considered, this study still provides an information-rich technique to determine shale matrix permeability at conditions close to reality.

AB - Matrix permeability is a key factor in determining long term gas production from shale reservoirs – requiring that it is determined under true reservoir conditions. We suggest a variable pressure gradient (VPG) protocol to measure shale matrix permeability using real reservoir fluids in powdered samples. The VPG method is described and a mathematical protocol for its analysis is developed. The first measures gas fractional production rate history under constant external pressure for each production stage and with a designated pressure gradient. The second establishes the mathematical protocol for analysis using pseudo-pressure to accommodate both the effect of gas pressure-dependent PVT parameters and desorption rate coefficient. The matrix permeability is determined by matching the solution of the model with the experimental data. The model fits the experimental data well when the fractional production is <0.75. Shale matrix permeability is calculated in the order of magnitude of 10−7–10−6 md. Methane permeability decreases with a decrease in both average pore pressure and particle size of the individual component grains. Permeability considerably more sensitive to changes in desorption rate coefficient than flow regimes. Compared with current small pressure gradient (SPG) methods, the VPG method is considerably more applicable to actual gas production and reduces to the SPG method under simplified boundary conditions. Although some approximate treatments are used for establishing the VPG method and some flow mechanisms are not considered, this study still provides an information-rich technique to determine shale matrix permeability at conditions close to reality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046791138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046791138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.coal.2018.04.011

DO - 10.1016/j.coal.2018.04.011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046791138

VL - 193

SP - 61

EP - 72

JO - International Journal of Coal Geology

JF - International Journal of Coal Geology

SN - 0166-5162

ER -