A first comparison of SLOPE and other LIGO burst event trigger generators

Amber L. Stuver, Lee Samuel Finn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

A number of different methods have been proposed to identify unanticipated burst sources of gravitational waves in data arising from LIGO and other gravitational wave detectors. When confronted with such a wide variety of methods one is moved to ask if they are all necessary, i.e. given detector data that is assumed to have no gravitational wave signals present, do they generally identify the same events with the same efficiency, or do they each 'see' different things in the detector? Here we consider three different methods, which have been used within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration as part of its search for unanticipated gravitational wave bursts. We find that each of these three different methods developed for identifying candidate gravitational wave burst sources are, in fact, attuned to significantly different features in detector data, suggesting that they may provide largely independent lists of candidate gravitational wave burst events.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberS12
Pages (from-to)S733-S740
JournalClassical and Quantum Gravity
Volume23
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 7 2006

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A first comparison of SLOPE and other LIGO burst event trigger generators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this