A framework for classifying disassemble/analyse/assemble activities in engineering design education

Madara M. Ogot, Gül E. Okudan, Timothy William Simpson, John S. Lamancusa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Disassemble/analyse/assemble (DAA) activities of an artifact pervade many undergraduate engineering courses in the USA as they provide useful ‘hands-on’ learning components. DAA activities are central to product dissection and reverse engineering activities used by many engineering practitioners as part of their industry’s benchmarking and competitive analysis processes. Although the two terms are used interchangeably in the literature and as part of course titles, we argue that they are different activities based on their roles, objectives and outcomes when used in engineering education. This paper presents a classification framework for DAA activities in engineering education that differentiates between product dissection and reverse engineering in the context of the desired educational goals. Relevant examples from existing classes and the literature are presented, and implementation challenges are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-135
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Design Research
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Dissection
Reverse engineering
Engineering education
Education
Benchmarking

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering (miscellaneous)
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cite this

@article{3fa0b3847e8a418b93e02a62a0be96e9,
title = "A framework for classifying disassemble/analyse/assemble activities in engineering design education",
abstract = "Disassemble/analyse/assemble (DAA) activities of an artifact pervade many undergraduate engineering courses in the USA as they provide useful ‘hands-on’ learning components. DAA activities are central to product dissection and reverse engineering activities used by many engineering practitioners as part of their industry’s benchmarking and competitive analysis processes. Although the two terms are used interchangeably in the literature and as part of course titles, we argue that they are different activities based on their roles, objectives and outcomes when used in engineering education. This paper presents a classification framework for DAA activities in engineering education that differentiates between product dissection and reverse engineering in the context of the desired educational goals. Relevant examples from existing classes and the literature are presented, and implementation challenges are discussed.",
author = "Ogot, {Madara M.} and Okudan, {G{\"u}l E.} and Simpson, {Timothy William} and Lamancusa, {John S.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1504/JDR.2008.020852",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "120--135",
journal = "Journal of Design Research",
issn = "1748-3050",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd",
number = "2",

}

A framework for classifying disassemble/analyse/assemble activities in engineering design education. / Ogot, Madara M.; Okudan, Gül E.; Simpson, Timothy William; Lamancusa, John S.

In: Journal of Design Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.01.2008, p. 120-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for classifying disassemble/analyse/assemble activities in engineering design education

AU - Ogot, Madara M.

AU - Okudan, Gül E.

AU - Simpson, Timothy William

AU - Lamancusa, John S.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Disassemble/analyse/assemble (DAA) activities of an artifact pervade many undergraduate engineering courses in the USA as they provide useful ‘hands-on’ learning components. DAA activities are central to product dissection and reverse engineering activities used by many engineering practitioners as part of their industry’s benchmarking and competitive analysis processes. Although the two terms are used interchangeably in the literature and as part of course titles, we argue that they are different activities based on their roles, objectives and outcomes when used in engineering education. This paper presents a classification framework for DAA activities in engineering education that differentiates between product dissection and reverse engineering in the context of the desired educational goals. Relevant examples from existing classes and the literature are presented, and implementation challenges are discussed.

AB - Disassemble/analyse/assemble (DAA) activities of an artifact pervade many undergraduate engineering courses in the USA as they provide useful ‘hands-on’ learning components. DAA activities are central to product dissection and reverse engineering activities used by many engineering practitioners as part of their industry’s benchmarking and competitive analysis processes. Although the two terms are used interchangeably in the literature and as part of course titles, we argue that they are different activities based on their roles, objectives and outcomes when used in engineering education. This paper presents a classification framework for DAA activities in engineering education that differentiates between product dissection and reverse engineering in the context of the desired educational goals. Relevant examples from existing classes and the literature are presented, and implementation challenges are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950703055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950703055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/JDR.2008.020852

DO - 10.1504/JDR.2008.020852

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 120

EP - 135

JO - Journal of Design Research

JF - Journal of Design Research

SN - 1748-3050

IS - 2

ER -