A general equilibrium interpretation of damage-contingent securities

R. Anton Braun, Richard M. Todd, Neil Wallace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cass, Chichilnisky, and Wu (1996) show in an endowment economy that mutual insurance and securities contingent on aggregate states support optimal risk-sharing. We extend their result to a model with production in which risk is endogenous and beliefs about the aggregate state vary across individuals. We use the model to interpret the role of new securities that are contingent on measures of total damage from natural catastrophes. Plausible special cases of the model predict the trade pattern in such securities across diverse regions and predict that such securities will not represent actuarially fair gambles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)583-595
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Risk and Insurance
Volume66
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

Damage
General equilibrium
Endowments
Trade patterns
Optimal risk sharing
Mutual insurance
Gambles
Natural catastrophes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Braun, R. Anton ; Todd, Richard M. ; Wallace, Neil. / A general equilibrium interpretation of damage-contingent securities. In: Journal of Risk and Insurance. 1999 ; Vol. 66, No. 4. pp. 583-595.
@article{84a6f360387f4891a6643ddf7d7ebcf2,
title = "A general equilibrium interpretation of damage-contingent securities",
abstract = "Cass, Chichilnisky, and Wu (1996) show in an endowment economy that mutual insurance and securities contingent on aggregate states support optimal risk-sharing. We extend their result to a model with production in which risk is endogenous and beliefs about the aggregate state vary across individuals. We use the model to interpret the role of new securities that are contingent on measures of total damage from natural catastrophes. Plausible special cases of the model predict the trade pattern in such securities across diverse regions and predict that such securities will not represent actuarially fair gambles.",
author = "Braun, {R. Anton} and Todd, {Richard M.} and Neil Wallace",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/253864",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "583--595",
journal = "Journal of Risk and Insurance",
issn = "0022-4367",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

A general equilibrium interpretation of damage-contingent securities. / Braun, R. Anton; Todd, Richard M.; Wallace, Neil.

In: Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 66, No. 4, 01.01.1999, p. 583-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A general equilibrium interpretation of damage-contingent securities

AU - Braun, R. Anton

AU - Todd, Richard M.

AU - Wallace, Neil

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Cass, Chichilnisky, and Wu (1996) show in an endowment economy that mutual insurance and securities contingent on aggregate states support optimal risk-sharing. We extend their result to a model with production in which risk is endogenous and beliefs about the aggregate state vary across individuals. We use the model to interpret the role of new securities that are contingent on measures of total damage from natural catastrophes. Plausible special cases of the model predict the trade pattern in such securities across diverse regions and predict that such securities will not represent actuarially fair gambles.

AB - Cass, Chichilnisky, and Wu (1996) show in an endowment economy that mutual insurance and securities contingent on aggregate states support optimal risk-sharing. We extend their result to a model with production in which risk is endogenous and beliefs about the aggregate state vary across individuals. We use the model to interpret the role of new securities that are contingent on measures of total damage from natural catastrophes. Plausible special cases of the model predict the trade pattern in such securities across diverse regions and predict that such securities will not represent actuarially fair gambles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039696742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0039696742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/253864

DO - 10.2307/253864

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0039696742

VL - 66

SP - 583

EP - 595

JO - Journal of Risk and Insurance

JF - Journal of Risk and Insurance

SN - 0022-4367

IS - 4

ER -