A global conversation about energy from biomass: The continental conventions of the global sustainable bioenergy project

Lee Rybeck Lynd, Ramlan Abdul Aziz, Carlos Henrique de Brito Cruz, Annie Fabian Abel Chimphango, Luis Augusto Barbosa Cortez, Andre Faaij, Nathanael Greene, Martin Keller, Patricia Osseweijer, Tom L. Richard, John Sheehan, Archana Chugh, Luuk van der Wielen, Jeremy Woods, Willem Heber van Zyl

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The global sustainable bioenergy (GSB) project was formed in 2009 with the goal of providing guidance with respect to the feasibility and desirability of sustainable, bioenergy-intensive futures. Stage 1 of this project held conventions with a largely common format on each of the world's continents, was completed in 2010, and is described in this paper. Attended by over 400 persons, the five continental conventions featured presentations, breakout sessions, and drafting of resolutions that were unanimously passed by attendees. The resolutions highlight the potential of bioenergy to make a large energy supply contribution while honouring other priorities, acknowledge the breadth and complexity of bioenergy applications as well as the need to take a systemic approach, and attest to substantial intra- and inter-continental diversity with respect to needs, opportunities, constraints and current practice relevant to bioenergy. The following interim recommendations based on stage 1 GSB activities are offered: - Realize that it may be more productive, and also more correct, to view the seemingly divergent assessments of bioenergy as answers to two different questions rather than the same question. Viewed in this light, there is considerably more scope for reconciliation than might first be apparent, and it is possible to be informed rather than paralysed by divergent assessments.- Develop established and advanced bioenergy technologies such that each contributes to the other's success. That is, support and deploy in the near-term meritorious, established technologies in ways that enhance rather than impede deployment of advanced technologies, and support and deploy advanced technologies in ways that expand rather than contract opportunities for early adopters and investors. - Be clear in formulating policies what mix of objectives are being targeted, measure the results of these policies against these objectives and beware of unintended consequences. - Undertake further exploration of land efficiency levers and visions for multiply-beneficial bioenergy deployment. This should be unconstrained by current practices, since we cannot hope to achieve a sustainable and a secure future by continuing the practices that have led to the unsustainable and insecure present. It should also be approached from a global perspective, based on the best science available, and consider the diverse realities, constraints, needs and opportunities extant in different regions of the world. The future trajectory of the GSB project is also briefly considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-279
Number of pages9
JournalInterface Focus
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Biomass
Technology
Contracts
Trajectories

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biotechnology
  • Biophysics
  • Bioengineering
  • Biochemistry
  • Biomaterials
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Lynd, L. R., Aziz, R. A., Cruz, C. H. D. B., Chimphango, A. F. A., Cortez, L. A. B., Faaij, A., ... van Zyl, W. H. (2011). A global conversation about energy from biomass: The continental conventions of the global sustainable bioenergy project. Interface Focus, 1(2), 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2010.0047
Lynd, Lee Rybeck ; Aziz, Ramlan Abdul ; Cruz, Carlos Henrique de Brito ; Chimphango, Annie Fabian Abel ; Cortez, Luis Augusto Barbosa ; Faaij, Andre ; Greene, Nathanael ; Keller, Martin ; Osseweijer, Patricia ; Richard, Tom L. ; Sheehan, John ; Chugh, Archana ; van der Wielen, Luuk ; Woods, Jeremy ; van Zyl, Willem Heber. / A global conversation about energy from biomass : The continental conventions of the global sustainable bioenergy project. In: Interface Focus. 2011 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 271-279.
@article{30a974d57b374c7da96d238c0f45e858,
title = "A global conversation about energy from biomass: The continental conventions of the global sustainable bioenergy project",
abstract = "The global sustainable bioenergy (GSB) project was formed in 2009 with the goal of providing guidance with respect to the feasibility and desirability of sustainable, bioenergy-intensive futures. Stage 1 of this project held conventions with a largely common format on each of the world's continents, was completed in 2010, and is described in this paper. Attended by over 400 persons, the five continental conventions featured presentations, breakout sessions, and drafting of resolutions that were unanimously passed by attendees. The resolutions highlight the potential of bioenergy to make a large energy supply contribution while honouring other priorities, acknowledge the breadth and complexity of bioenergy applications as well as the need to take a systemic approach, and attest to substantial intra- and inter-continental diversity with respect to needs, opportunities, constraints and current practice relevant to bioenergy. The following interim recommendations based on stage 1 GSB activities are offered: - Realize that it may be more productive, and also more correct, to view the seemingly divergent assessments of bioenergy as answers to two different questions rather than the same question. Viewed in this light, there is considerably more scope for reconciliation than might first be apparent, and it is possible to be informed rather than paralysed by divergent assessments.- Develop established and advanced bioenergy technologies such that each contributes to the other's success. That is, support and deploy in the near-term meritorious, established technologies in ways that enhance rather than impede deployment of advanced technologies, and support and deploy advanced technologies in ways that expand rather than contract opportunities for early adopters and investors. - Be clear in formulating policies what mix of objectives are being targeted, measure the results of these policies against these objectives and beware of unintended consequences. - Undertake further exploration of land efficiency levers and visions for multiply-beneficial bioenergy deployment. This should be unconstrained by current practices, since we cannot hope to achieve a sustainable and a secure future by continuing the practices that have led to the unsustainable and insecure present. It should also be approached from a global perspective, based on the best science available, and consider the diverse realities, constraints, needs and opportunities extant in different regions of the world. The future trajectory of the GSB project is also briefly considered.",
author = "Lynd, {Lee Rybeck} and Aziz, {Ramlan Abdul} and Cruz, {Carlos Henrique de Brito} and Chimphango, {Annie Fabian Abel} and Cortez, {Luis Augusto Barbosa} and Andre Faaij and Nathanael Greene and Martin Keller and Patricia Osseweijer and Richard, {Tom L.} and John Sheehan and Archana Chugh and {van der Wielen}, Luuk and Jeremy Woods and {van Zyl}, {Willem Heber}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1098/rsfs.2010.0047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "271--279",
journal = "Interface Focus",
issn = "2042-8898",
publisher = "Royal Society Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Lynd, LR, Aziz, RA, Cruz, CHDB, Chimphango, AFA, Cortez, LAB, Faaij, A, Greene, N, Keller, M, Osseweijer, P, Richard, TL, Sheehan, J, Chugh, A, van der Wielen, L, Woods, J & van Zyl, WH 2011, 'A global conversation about energy from biomass: The continental conventions of the global sustainable bioenergy project', Interface Focus, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2010.0047

A global conversation about energy from biomass : The continental conventions of the global sustainable bioenergy project. / Lynd, Lee Rybeck; Aziz, Ramlan Abdul; Cruz, Carlos Henrique de Brito; Chimphango, Annie Fabian Abel; Cortez, Luis Augusto Barbosa; Faaij, Andre; Greene, Nathanael; Keller, Martin; Osseweijer, Patricia; Richard, Tom L.; Sheehan, John; Chugh, Archana; van der Wielen, Luuk; Woods, Jeremy; van Zyl, Willem Heber.

In: Interface Focus, Vol. 1, No. 2, 01.01.2011, p. 271-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A global conversation about energy from biomass

T2 - The continental conventions of the global sustainable bioenergy project

AU - Lynd, Lee Rybeck

AU - Aziz, Ramlan Abdul

AU - Cruz, Carlos Henrique de Brito

AU - Chimphango, Annie Fabian Abel

AU - Cortez, Luis Augusto Barbosa

AU - Faaij, Andre

AU - Greene, Nathanael

AU - Keller, Martin

AU - Osseweijer, Patricia

AU - Richard, Tom L.

AU - Sheehan, John

AU - Chugh, Archana

AU - van der Wielen, Luuk

AU - Woods, Jeremy

AU - van Zyl, Willem Heber

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - The global sustainable bioenergy (GSB) project was formed in 2009 with the goal of providing guidance with respect to the feasibility and desirability of sustainable, bioenergy-intensive futures. Stage 1 of this project held conventions with a largely common format on each of the world's continents, was completed in 2010, and is described in this paper. Attended by over 400 persons, the five continental conventions featured presentations, breakout sessions, and drafting of resolutions that were unanimously passed by attendees. The resolutions highlight the potential of bioenergy to make a large energy supply contribution while honouring other priorities, acknowledge the breadth and complexity of bioenergy applications as well as the need to take a systemic approach, and attest to substantial intra- and inter-continental diversity with respect to needs, opportunities, constraints and current practice relevant to bioenergy. The following interim recommendations based on stage 1 GSB activities are offered: - Realize that it may be more productive, and also more correct, to view the seemingly divergent assessments of bioenergy as answers to two different questions rather than the same question. Viewed in this light, there is considerably more scope for reconciliation than might first be apparent, and it is possible to be informed rather than paralysed by divergent assessments.- Develop established and advanced bioenergy technologies such that each contributes to the other's success. That is, support and deploy in the near-term meritorious, established technologies in ways that enhance rather than impede deployment of advanced technologies, and support and deploy advanced technologies in ways that expand rather than contract opportunities for early adopters and investors. - Be clear in formulating policies what mix of objectives are being targeted, measure the results of these policies against these objectives and beware of unintended consequences. - Undertake further exploration of land efficiency levers and visions for multiply-beneficial bioenergy deployment. This should be unconstrained by current practices, since we cannot hope to achieve a sustainable and a secure future by continuing the practices that have led to the unsustainable and insecure present. It should also be approached from a global perspective, based on the best science available, and consider the diverse realities, constraints, needs and opportunities extant in different regions of the world. The future trajectory of the GSB project is also briefly considered.

AB - The global sustainable bioenergy (GSB) project was formed in 2009 with the goal of providing guidance with respect to the feasibility and desirability of sustainable, bioenergy-intensive futures. Stage 1 of this project held conventions with a largely common format on each of the world's continents, was completed in 2010, and is described in this paper. Attended by over 400 persons, the five continental conventions featured presentations, breakout sessions, and drafting of resolutions that were unanimously passed by attendees. The resolutions highlight the potential of bioenergy to make a large energy supply contribution while honouring other priorities, acknowledge the breadth and complexity of bioenergy applications as well as the need to take a systemic approach, and attest to substantial intra- and inter-continental diversity with respect to needs, opportunities, constraints and current practice relevant to bioenergy. The following interim recommendations based on stage 1 GSB activities are offered: - Realize that it may be more productive, and also more correct, to view the seemingly divergent assessments of bioenergy as answers to two different questions rather than the same question. Viewed in this light, there is considerably more scope for reconciliation than might first be apparent, and it is possible to be informed rather than paralysed by divergent assessments.- Develop established and advanced bioenergy technologies such that each contributes to the other's success. That is, support and deploy in the near-term meritorious, established technologies in ways that enhance rather than impede deployment of advanced technologies, and support and deploy advanced technologies in ways that expand rather than contract opportunities for early adopters and investors. - Be clear in formulating policies what mix of objectives are being targeted, measure the results of these policies against these objectives and beware of unintended consequences. - Undertake further exploration of land efficiency levers and visions for multiply-beneficial bioenergy deployment. This should be unconstrained by current practices, since we cannot hope to achieve a sustainable and a secure future by continuing the practices that have led to the unsustainable and insecure present. It should also be approached from a global perspective, based on the best science available, and consider the diverse realities, constraints, needs and opportunities extant in different regions of the world. The future trajectory of the GSB project is also briefly considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053113297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053113297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0047

DO - 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0047

M3 - Review article

C2 - 22419984

AN - SCOPUS:80053113297

VL - 1

SP - 271

EP - 279

JO - Interface Focus

JF - Interface Focus

SN - 2042-8898

IS - 2

ER -