A Legal Analysis of the Gauweiler Case: Between Monetary Policy and Constitutional Conflict

Takis Tridimas, Napoleon Xanthoulis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

In Gauweiler, in response to the first ever preliminary reference made by the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht; FCC), the Court of Justice gave the green light to the ECB's power to selectively purchase Eurozone government bonds in secondary markets (OMT programme). Whilst the Court of Justice sets some limits to European Central Bank's (ECB) authority relying on the golden standard of proportionality, it is a judgment of institutional empowerment. The tensions and instability arising from the separation of competences in monetary and economic policy gravitate to the advantage of the Union. By placing emphasis on the objectives rather than the effects of the programme and linking OMT power to conditionality, Gauweiler builds on Pringle providing normative legitimization to the austerity model whilst granting the ECB a distinct role not only in monetary policy but also in shaping the general economic policy of the Union. The Court of Justice's ruling also indicates a measured but firm response to the dialogue of conflict initiated by the FCC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-39
Number of pages23
JournalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Legal Analysis of the Gauweiler Case: Between Monetary Policy and Constitutional Conflict'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this