TY - JOUR
T1 - A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance
T2 - Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships
AU - Gully, Stanley M.
AU - Incalcaterra, Kara A.
AU - Joshi, Aparna
AU - Beaubien, J. Matthew
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2002/10
Y1 - 2002/10
N2 - Meta-amanalytic techniques were used to examine level of analysis and interdependence as moderators of observed relationships between task-specific team-efficacy, generalized potency, and performance. Sixty-seven empirical studies yielding 256 effect sizes were identified and meta-analyzed. Results demonstrated that relationships are moderated by level of analysis. Effect sizes were stronger at the team level (ρ = .39) than at the individual level (ρ = .20). At the team level, both team-efficacy and potency had positive relationships with performance (ρs = .41 and .37, respectively). Interdependence significantly moderated the relationship between team-efficacy and performance, but not between potency and performance. The relationship between team-efficacy and performance was stronger when interdependence was high (ρ = .45) than when it was low (ρ = .34).
AB - Meta-amanalytic techniques were used to examine level of analysis and interdependence as moderators of observed relationships between task-specific team-efficacy, generalized potency, and performance. Sixty-seven empirical studies yielding 256 effect sizes were identified and meta-analyzed. Results demonstrated that relationships are moderated by level of analysis. Effect sizes were stronger at the team level (ρ = .39) than at the individual level (ρ = .20). At the team level, both team-efficacy and potency had positive relationships with performance (ρs = .41 and .37, respectively). Interdependence significantly moderated the relationship between team-efficacy and performance, but not between potency and performance. The relationship between team-efficacy and performance was stronger when interdependence was high (ρ = .45) than when it was low (ρ = .34).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036798460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036798460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
M3 - Article
C2 - 12395807
AN - SCOPUS:0036798460
VL - 87
SP - 819
EP - 832
JO - Journal of Applied Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied Psychology
SN - 0021-9010
IS - 5
ER -