A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy for Barrett's esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Atul Bhardwaj, Christopher S. Hollenbeak, Nakechand Pooran, Abraham Mathew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) for Barrett's esophagus (BE) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).METHODS:Literature was searched for blinded studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ECE for BE in patients with GERD. Meta-analysis was carried out to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for diagnosis of BE. Subgroup analysis was also carried out based on the reference standard used.RESULTS:Nine studies comprising a total of 618 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for the diagnosis of BE for all studies were 77 and 86 respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for the diagnosis of BE using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) as the reference standard were 78 and 90, respectively; using histologically confirmed intestinal metaplasia (IM) as the reference standard pooled sensitivity and specificity were 78 and 73, respectively. Statistical heterogeneity was not evident among studies for sensitivity results (P0.270, I219), but heterogeneity was present for specificity results (P<0.001, I274). There was no evidence of publication bias. The ECE was found to be safe and had a high rate of patient preference.CONCLUSIONS:Capsule endoscopy of esophagus has a moderate sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of BE in patients with GERD. The EGD remains the modality of choice for evaluation of suspected BE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1533-1539
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume104
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

Capsule Endoscopy
Barrett Esophagus
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Meta-Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Digestive System Endoscopy
Publication Bias
Patient Preference
Metaplasia
Esophagus

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

@article{d3ba1ccf58eb4d4d97cf4e19c8666451,
title = "A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy for Barrett's esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) for Barrett's esophagus (BE) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).METHODS:Literature was searched for blinded studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ECE for BE in patients with GERD. Meta-analysis was carried out to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for diagnosis of BE. Subgroup analysis was also carried out based on the reference standard used.RESULTS:Nine studies comprising a total of 618 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for the diagnosis of BE for all studies were 77 and 86 respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for the diagnosis of BE using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) as the reference standard were 78 and 90, respectively; using histologically confirmed intestinal metaplasia (IM) as the reference standard pooled sensitivity and specificity were 78 and 73, respectively. Statistical heterogeneity was not evident among studies for sensitivity results (P0.270, I219), but heterogeneity was present for specificity results (P<0.001, I274). There was no evidence of publication bias. The ECE was found to be safe and had a high rate of patient preference.CONCLUSIONS:Capsule endoscopy of esophagus has a moderate sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of BE in patients with GERD. The EGD remains the modality of choice for evaluation of suspected BE.",
author = "Atul Bhardwaj and Hollenbeak, {Christopher S.} and Nakechand Pooran and Abraham Mathew",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/ajg.2009.86",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "1533--1539",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy for Barrett's esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

AU - Bhardwaj, Atul

AU - Hollenbeak, Christopher S.

AU - Pooran, Nakechand

AU - Mathew, Abraham

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) for Barrett's esophagus (BE) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).METHODS:Literature was searched for blinded studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ECE for BE in patients with GERD. Meta-analysis was carried out to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for diagnosis of BE. Subgroup analysis was also carried out based on the reference standard used.RESULTS:Nine studies comprising a total of 618 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for the diagnosis of BE for all studies were 77 and 86 respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for the diagnosis of BE using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) as the reference standard were 78 and 90, respectively; using histologically confirmed intestinal metaplasia (IM) as the reference standard pooled sensitivity and specificity were 78 and 73, respectively. Statistical heterogeneity was not evident among studies for sensitivity results (P0.270, I219), but heterogeneity was present for specificity results (P<0.001, I274). There was no evidence of publication bias. The ECE was found to be safe and had a high rate of patient preference.CONCLUSIONS:Capsule endoscopy of esophagus has a moderate sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of BE in patients with GERD. The EGD remains the modality of choice for evaluation of suspected BE.

AB - OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) for Barrett's esophagus (BE) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).METHODS:Literature was searched for blinded studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ECE for BE in patients with GERD. Meta-analysis was carried out to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for diagnosis of BE. Subgroup analysis was also carried out based on the reference standard used.RESULTS:Nine studies comprising a total of 618 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for the diagnosis of BE for all studies were 77 and 86 respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECE for the diagnosis of BE using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) as the reference standard were 78 and 90, respectively; using histologically confirmed intestinal metaplasia (IM) as the reference standard pooled sensitivity and specificity were 78 and 73, respectively. Statistical heterogeneity was not evident among studies for sensitivity results (P0.270, I219), but heterogeneity was present for specificity results (P<0.001, I274). There was no evidence of publication bias. The ECE was found to be safe and had a high rate of patient preference.CONCLUSIONS:Capsule endoscopy of esophagus has a moderate sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of BE in patients with GERD. The EGD remains the modality of choice for evaluation of suspected BE.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66949126137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66949126137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ajg.2009.86

DO - 10.1038/ajg.2009.86

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 1533

EP - 1539

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 6

ER -