A Meta-Analytic review of the productivity and satisfaction of democratic and autocratic leadership

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There exists a wealth of research examining the effects of democratic and autocratic leadership on group productivity and member satisfaction; however, past reviews of this literature have not systematically integrated the results of available quantitative studies. This essay uses a meta-analysis to provide such an integration. Analysis reveals no correlation between democraticdautocratic leadership style and productivity, except when taking into consideration the influence of study setting and task complexity. Results also suggest that democratic leadership has a moderate positive correlation with member satisfaction, but this relationship may be moderated by task complexity. The conclusion discusses the limits of experimentally manipulating democratic leadership and the need for conceptual refinement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)384-410
Number of pages27
JournalSmall Group Research
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{53bce5afd47f47cfbbc12ec8a7c4ba14,
title = "A Meta-Analytic review of the productivity and satisfaction of democratic and autocratic leadership",
abstract = "There exists a wealth of research examining the effects of democratic and autocratic leadership on group productivity and member satisfaction; however, past reviews of this literature have not systematically integrated the results of available quantitative studies. This essay uses a meta-analysis to provide such an integration. Analysis reveals no correlation between democraticdautocratic leadership style and productivity, except when taking into consideration the influence of study setting and task complexity. Results also suggest that democratic leadership has a moderate positive correlation with member satisfaction, but this relationship may be moderated by task complexity. The conclusion discusses the limits of experimentally manipulating democratic leadership and the need for conceptual refinement.",
author = "Gastil, {John W.}",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1046496494253003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "384--410",
journal = "Small Group Research",
issn = "1046-4964",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

A Meta-Analytic review of the productivity and satisfaction of democratic and autocratic leadership. / Gastil, John W.

In: Small Group Research, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.01.1994, p. 384-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Meta-Analytic review of the productivity and satisfaction of democratic and autocratic leadership

AU - Gastil, John W.

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - There exists a wealth of research examining the effects of democratic and autocratic leadership on group productivity and member satisfaction; however, past reviews of this literature have not systematically integrated the results of available quantitative studies. This essay uses a meta-analysis to provide such an integration. Analysis reveals no correlation between democraticdautocratic leadership style and productivity, except when taking into consideration the influence of study setting and task complexity. Results also suggest that democratic leadership has a moderate positive correlation with member satisfaction, but this relationship may be moderated by task complexity. The conclusion discusses the limits of experimentally manipulating democratic leadership and the need for conceptual refinement.

AB - There exists a wealth of research examining the effects of democratic and autocratic leadership on group productivity and member satisfaction; however, past reviews of this literature have not systematically integrated the results of available quantitative studies. This essay uses a meta-analysis to provide such an integration. Analysis reveals no correlation between democraticdautocratic leadership style and productivity, except when taking into consideration the influence of study setting and task complexity. Results also suggest that democratic leadership has a moderate positive correlation with member satisfaction, but this relationship may be moderated by task complexity. The conclusion discusses the limits of experimentally manipulating democratic leadership and the need for conceptual refinement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965673566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965673566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1046496494253003

DO - 10.1177/1046496494253003

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 384

EP - 410

JO - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

SN - 1046-4964

IS - 3

ER -