A method to evaluate direct and indirect design dependencies between components in a product architecture

Sangjin Jung, Oyku Asikoglu, Timothy William Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Methods for evaluating the strength of design dependencies in a product architecture have been widely studied in the literature; however, evaluating the effects of direct and indirect interactions between components/modules remains a challenge. In fact, indirect connections between components/modules are often overlooked in many cases when evaluating design dependencies. Having a more consistent way of defining a product architecture that considers both its direct and indirect connections is important, especially when analyzing redesign complexity and change propagation. In this study, we propose a systematic method to evaluate direct and indirect design dependencies between components in product architectures. Interfaces are classified into six different types based on a thorough review of the literature, and a method for evaluating design dependencies is introduced to estimate the relative importance of interfaces directly from a set of comparable products. Using an electrical circuit analogy, the proposed method can quantify both direct and indirect design dependencies between components within a product architecture. We compare design dependency results for different wireless computer mice to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that using the proposed design dependency measure including direct and indirect effects provides more reliable design dependency results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)507-530
Number of pages24
JournalResearch in Engineering Design
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Networks (circuits)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Architecture
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

@article{3a4b32037a0b466582b633eecab68f7a,
title = "A method to evaluate direct and indirect design dependencies between components in a product architecture",
abstract = "Methods for evaluating the strength of design dependencies in a product architecture have been widely studied in the literature; however, evaluating the effects of direct and indirect interactions between components/modules remains a challenge. In fact, indirect connections between components/modules are often overlooked in many cases when evaluating design dependencies. Having a more consistent way of defining a product architecture that considers both its direct and indirect connections is important, especially when analyzing redesign complexity and change propagation. In this study, we propose a systematic method to evaluate direct and indirect design dependencies between components in product architectures. Interfaces are classified into six different types based on a thorough review of the literature, and a method for evaluating design dependencies is introduced to estimate the relative importance of interfaces directly from a set of comparable products. Using an electrical circuit analogy, the proposed method can quantify both direct and indirect design dependencies between components within a product architecture. We compare design dependency results for different wireless computer mice to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that using the proposed design dependency measure including direct and indirect effects provides more reliable design dependency results.",
author = "Sangjin Jung and Oyku Asikoglu and Simpson, {Timothy William}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00163-018-0291-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "507--530",
journal = "Research in Engineering Design - Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering",
issn = "0934-9839",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "4",

}

A method to evaluate direct and indirect design dependencies between components in a product architecture. / Jung, Sangjin; Asikoglu, Oyku; Simpson, Timothy William.

In: Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.10.2018, p. 507-530.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A method to evaluate direct and indirect design dependencies between components in a product architecture

AU - Jung, Sangjin

AU - Asikoglu, Oyku

AU - Simpson, Timothy William

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Methods for evaluating the strength of design dependencies in a product architecture have been widely studied in the literature; however, evaluating the effects of direct and indirect interactions between components/modules remains a challenge. In fact, indirect connections between components/modules are often overlooked in many cases when evaluating design dependencies. Having a more consistent way of defining a product architecture that considers both its direct and indirect connections is important, especially when analyzing redesign complexity and change propagation. In this study, we propose a systematic method to evaluate direct and indirect design dependencies between components in product architectures. Interfaces are classified into six different types based on a thorough review of the literature, and a method for evaluating design dependencies is introduced to estimate the relative importance of interfaces directly from a set of comparable products. Using an electrical circuit analogy, the proposed method can quantify both direct and indirect design dependencies between components within a product architecture. We compare design dependency results for different wireless computer mice to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that using the proposed design dependency measure including direct and indirect effects provides more reliable design dependency results.

AB - Methods for evaluating the strength of design dependencies in a product architecture have been widely studied in the literature; however, evaluating the effects of direct and indirect interactions between components/modules remains a challenge. In fact, indirect connections between components/modules are often overlooked in many cases when evaluating design dependencies. Having a more consistent way of defining a product architecture that considers both its direct and indirect connections is important, especially when analyzing redesign complexity and change propagation. In this study, we propose a systematic method to evaluate direct and indirect design dependencies between components in product architectures. Interfaces are classified into six different types based on a thorough review of the literature, and a method for evaluating design dependencies is introduced to estimate the relative importance of interfaces directly from a set of comparable products. Using an electrical circuit analogy, the proposed method can quantify both direct and indirect design dependencies between components within a product architecture. We compare design dependency results for different wireless computer mice to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that using the proposed design dependency measure including direct and indirect effects provides more reliable design dependency results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048741138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048741138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00163-018-0291-x

DO - 10.1007/s00163-018-0291-x

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 507

EP - 530

JO - Research in Engineering Design - Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering

JF - Research in Engineering Design - Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering

SN - 0934-9839

IS - 4

ER -