A modeling comparison between a two-stage and three-stage cascaded thermoelectric generator

Eurydice Kanimba, Matthew Pearson, Jeff Sharp, David Stokes, Shashank Priya, Zhiting Tian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this work, a comparison between the performance of two- and three-stage cascaded thermoelectric generator (TEG) devices is analyzed based on a prescribed maximum hot side temperature of 973 K, an imposed maximum heat input of 505 W, and a fixed cold side temperature of 473 K. Half-Heusler is used as a thermoelectric (TE) material in the top higher temperature stage and skutterudite as a TE in the bottom lower temperature stage for the two-stage structure. Lead telluride is added in the middle stage to form the three-stage structure. Based on the prescribed constraints, the two-stage cascaded TEG is found to produce a power output of 42 W with an efficiency of 8.3%. The three-stage cascaded TEG produces a power output of 51 W with an efficiency of 10.2%. The three-stage cascaded TEG produces 21% more power than the two-stage does; however, if the system complexity, mechanical robustness, manufacturability, and/or cost of three-stage cascaded TEG outweigh the 21% percent power production increase, the two-stage TEG could be preferable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)266-272
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Power Sources
Volume365
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A modeling comparison between a two-stage and three-stage cascaded thermoelectric generator'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this