A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests

David Lynn Lowery, Virginia Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We modestly challenge Baumgartner and Leech's (1998) very pessimistic assessment of the state of interest group research by arguing that there has been a rich collaboration of theory and data during the 1990s, which at least points toward a new and more coherent theoretical perspective on interest representation, and one largely indigenous to political science. With some trepidation given its checkered history, we label this perspective as a neopluralist view. We explore this developing approach in three steps. We first provide a broad outline of three distinct approaches to the study of interest representation, identifying how each has understood the various stages on which organized interests have attracted the attention of scholars. We then identify six attributes of the emerging neopluralist approach that distinguish it from prior work on interest representation. Finally, we consider the appropriateness of our proposed neopluralist label and what must be done to further develop the neopluralist perspective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-175
Number of pages13
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume57
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1 2004

Fingerprint

representation of interests
interest group
political science
history

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Lowery, David Lynn ; Gray, Virginia. / A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests. In: Political Research Quarterly. 2004 ; Vol. 57, No. 1. pp. 163-175.
@article{4d05e7f2782546c79b5e9a8ce936b17f,
title = "A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests",
abstract = "We modestly challenge Baumgartner and Leech's (1998) very pessimistic assessment of the state of interest group research by arguing that there has been a rich collaboration of theory and data during the 1990s, which at least points toward a new and more coherent theoretical perspective on interest representation, and one largely indigenous to political science. With some trepidation given its checkered history, we label this perspective as a neopluralist view. We explore this developing approach in three steps. We first provide a broad outline of three distinct approaches to the study of interest representation, identifying how each has understood the various stages on which organized interests have attracted the attention of scholars. We then identify six attributes of the emerging neopluralist approach that distinguish it from prior work on interest representation. Finally, we consider the appropriateness of our proposed neopluralist label and what must be done to further develop the neopluralist perspective.",
author = "Lowery, {David Lynn} and Virginia Gray",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "163--175",
journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
issn = "1065-9129",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Lowery, DL & Gray, V 2004, 'A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests', Political Research Quarterly, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 163-175.

A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests. / Lowery, David Lynn; Gray, Virginia.

In: Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 1, 01.03.2004, p. 163-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests

AU - Lowery, David Lynn

AU - Gray, Virginia

PY - 2004/3/1

Y1 - 2004/3/1

N2 - We modestly challenge Baumgartner and Leech's (1998) very pessimistic assessment of the state of interest group research by arguing that there has been a rich collaboration of theory and data during the 1990s, which at least points toward a new and more coherent theoretical perspective on interest representation, and one largely indigenous to political science. With some trepidation given its checkered history, we label this perspective as a neopluralist view. We explore this developing approach in three steps. We first provide a broad outline of three distinct approaches to the study of interest representation, identifying how each has understood the various stages on which organized interests have attracted the attention of scholars. We then identify six attributes of the emerging neopluralist approach that distinguish it from prior work on interest representation. Finally, we consider the appropriateness of our proposed neopluralist label and what must be done to further develop the neopluralist perspective.

AB - We modestly challenge Baumgartner and Leech's (1998) very pessimistic assessment of the state of interest group research by arguing that there has been a rich collaboration of theory and data during the 1990s, which at least points toward a new and more coherent theoretical perspective on interest representation, and one largely indigenous to political science. With some trepidation given its checkered history, we label this perspective as a neopluralist view. We explore this developing approach in three steps. We first provide a broad outline of three distinct approaches to the study of interest representation, identifying how each has understood the various stages on which organized interests have attracted the attention of scholars. We then identify six attributes of the emerging neopluralist approach that distinguish it from prior work on interest representation. Finally, we consider the appropriateness of our proposed neopluralist label and what must be done to further develop the neopluralist perspective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2142708287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2142708287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:2142708287

VL - 57

SP - 163

EP - 175

JO - Political Research Quarterly

JF - Political Research Quarterly

SN - 1065-9129

IS - 1

ER -