A pluralist approach to sex and recombination

S. A. West, C. M. Lively, Andrew Fraser Read

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

324 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the greatest challenges for evolutionary biology is explaining the widespread occurrence of sexual reproduction and the associated process of genetic recombination. A large number of theories have been developed that provide a sufficient short-term advantage for sex to offset its two-fold cost. These theories can be broadly classified into environmental (or ecological) and mutation-based models. Traditionally, the different theories have been viewed as competing, and empirical work has attempted to distinguish between them. Here we highlight the advantages that may be gained from considering that multiple mechanisms (environmental and mutational) may be at work, and that interactions between the theories may be very important.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1003-1012
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 1999

Fingerprint

genetic recombination
sexual reproduction
recombination
mutation
Biological Sciences
gender
evolutionary biology
fold
cost

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

West, S. A. ; Lively, C. M. ; Read, Andrew Fraser. / A pluralist approach to sex and recombination. In: Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 1999 ; Vol. 12, No. 6. pp. 1003-1012.
@article{278dde45d8714b54a0e2d19fe1140d3f,
title = "A pluralist approach to sex and recombination",
abstract = "One of the greatest challenges for evolutionary biology is explaining the widespread occurrence of sexual reproduction and the associated process of genetic recombination. A large number of theories have been developed that provide a sufficient short-term advantage for sex to offset its two-fold cost. These theories can be broadly classified into environmental (or ecological) and mutation-based models. Traditionally, the different theories have been viewed as competing, and empirical work has attempted to distinguish between them. Here we highlight the advantages that may be gained from considering that multiple mechanisms (environmental and mutational) may be at work, and that interactions between the theories may be very important.",
author = "West, {S. A.} and Lively, {C. M.} and Read, {Andrew Fraser}",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00119.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "1003--1012",
journal = "Journal of Evolutionary Biology",
issn = "1010-061X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

A pluralist approach to sex and recombination. / West, S. A.; Lively, C. M.; Read, Andrew Fraser.

In: Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 12, No. 6, 01.11.1999, p. 1003-1012.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pluralist approach to sex and recombination

AU - West, S. A.

AU - Lively, C. M.

AU - Read, Andrew Fraser

PY - 1999/11/1

Y1 - 1999/11/1

N2 - One of the greatest challenges for evolutionary biology is explaining the widespread occurrence of sexual reproduction and the associated process of genetic recombination. A large number of theories have been developed that provide a sufficient short-term advantage for sex to offset its two-fold cost. These theories can be broadly classified into environmental (or ecological) and mutation-based models. Traditionally, the different theories have been viewed as competing, and empirical work has attempted to distinguish between them. Here we highlight the advantages that may be gained from considering that multiple mechanisms (environmental and mutational) may be at work, and that interactions between the theories may be very important.

AB - One of the greatest challenges for evolutionary biology is explaining the widespread occurrence of sexual reproduction and the associated process of genetic recombination. A large number of theories have been developed that provide a sufficient short-term advantage for sex to offset its two-fold cost. These theories can be broadly classified into environmental (or ecological) and mutation-based models. Traditionally, the different theories have been viewed as competing, and empirical work has attempted to distinguish between them. Here we highlight the advantages that may be gained from considering that multiple mechanisms (environmental and mutational) may be at work, and that interactions between the theories may be very important.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032697818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032697818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00119.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00119.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 12

SP - 1003

EP - 1012

JO - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

JF - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

SN - 1010-061X

IS - 6

ER -