A practical equation to predict resting metabolic rate in older men

Paul J. Arciero, Michael I. Goran, Andrew Gardner, Philip A. Ades, Robert S. Tyzbir, Eric T. Poehlman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accuracy of previous equations for predicting resting metabolic rate (RMR) in healthy older men is questionable because they are based on limited sample sizes and the absence of cross-validation procedures. The purposes of this study were to (1) examine biological predictors of RMR in healthy older men; (2) develop a practical equation to predict RMR from easily measured variables and examine its accuracy using cross-validation procedures; and (3) test the validity of existing equations in the literature to predict RMR in older men by comparison with measured RMR values. RMR, body composition, anthropometric measurements, leisure time activity (LTA), maximal aerobic power (Vo2max), energy intake, and plasma thyroid hormone levels were determined in 89 healthy older men aged 50 to 78 years. Stepwise regression analysis showed that RMR was best predicted by fat-free weight ([FFW] R2 = 85%), free 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine (T3) level (R2 = 1%), and Vo2max (R2 = 1%); these variables predicted RMR with a residual error of ±30 kcal/d. A practical equation was developed in a randomly selected subsample (N = 61) using easily measured variables as potential predictors, and was successfully cross-validated in a random subsample of older men (N = 28). The pooled equation to predict RMR is as follows: RMR (in kilocalories per day) = 9.7 (weight in kilograms) - 6.1 (chest skinfold thickness in millimeters) - 1.8 (age in years) + 0.1 (leisure time activity [LTA] in kilocalories per day) + 1,060. These variables accounted for 76% (R2) of the variation, and predicted RMR with a residual error of ±42 kcal/d. When four previously published equations were applied to predict RMR in our sample of older men, individual predicted values deviated -19% to +14% from measured values. We conclude that variations in FFW account for the greatest source of variation in RMR in older men. Current equations to predict RMR are generally imprecise on an individual basis when applied to older men. We offer a practical and successfully cross-validated equation to predict RMR in healthy older men based on measures of body weight, LTA, and chest skinfold thickness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)950-957
Number of pages8
JournalMetabolism
Volume42
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Basal Metabolism
Leisure Activities
Skinfold Thickness
Weights and Measures
Thorax
Fats
Body Weights and Measures
Triiodothyronine
Body Composition
Energy Intake
Thyroid Hormones

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

Cite this

Arciero, P. J., Goran, M. I., Gardner, A., Ades, P. A., Tyzbir, R. S., & Poehlman, E. T. (1993). A practical equation to predict resting metabolic rate in older men. Metabolism, 42(8), 950-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(93)90006-A
Arciero, Paul J. ; Goran, Michael I. ; Gardner, Andrew ; Ades, Philip A. ; Tyzbir, Robert S. ; Poehlman, Eric T. / A practical equation to predict resting metabolic rate in older men. In: Metabolism. 1993 ; Vol. 42, No. 8. pp. 950-957.
@article{1b5087e5d36c44519c4008e19e95a62e,
title = "A practical equation to predict resting metabolic rate in older men",
abstract = "The accuracy of previous equations for predicting resting metabolic rate (RMR) in healthy older men is questionable because they are based on limited sample sizes and the absence of cross-validation procedures. The purposes of this study were to (1) examine biological predictors of RMR in healthy older men; (2) develop a practical equation to predict RMR from easily measured variables and examine its accuracy using cross-validation procedures; and (3) test the validity of existing equations in the literature to predict RMR in older men by comparison with measured RMR values. RMR, body composition, anthropometric measurements, leisure time activity (LTA), maximal aerobic power (Vo2max), energy intake, and plasma thyroid hormone levels were determined in 89 healthy older men aged 50 to 78 years. Stepwise regression analysis showed that RMR was best predicted by fat-free weight ([FFW] R2 = 85{\%}), free 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine (T3) level (R2 = 1{\%}), and Vo2max (R2 = 1{\%}); these variables predicted RMR with a residual error of ±30 kcal/d. A practical equation was developed in a randomly selected subsample (N = 61) using easily measured variables as potential predictors, and was successfully cross-validated in a random subsample of older men (N = 28). The pooled equation to predict RMR is as follows: RMR (in kilocalories per day) = 9.7 (weight in kilograms) - 6.1 (chest skinfold thickness in millimeters) - 1.8 (age in years) + 0.1 (leisure time activity [LTA] in kilocalories per day) + 1,060. These variables accounted for 76{\%} (R2) of the variation, and predicted RMR with a residual error of ±42 kcal/d. When four previously published equations were applied to predict RMR in our sample of older men, individual predicted values deviated -19{\%} to +14{\%} from measured values. We conclude that variations in FFW account for the greatest source of variation in RMR in older men. Current equations to predict RMR are generally imprecise on an individual basis when applied to older men. We offer a practical and successfully cross-validated equation to predict RMR in healthy older men based on measures of body weight, LTA, and chest skinfold thickness.",
author = "Arciero, {Paul J.} and Goran, {Michael I.} and Andrew Gardner and Ades, {Philip A.} and Tyzbir, {Robert S.} and Poehlman, {Eric T.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0026-0495(93)90006-A",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "950--957",
journal = "Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental",
issn = "0026-0495",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "8",

}

Arciero, PJ, Goran, MI, Gardner, A, Ades, PA, Tyzbir, RS & Poehlman, ET 1993, 'A practical equation to predict resting metabolic rate in older men', Metabolism, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 950-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(93)90006-A

A practical equation to predict resting metabolic rate in older men. / Arciero, Paul J.; Goran, Michael I.; Gardner, Andrew; Ades, Philip A.; Tyzbir, Robert S.; Poehlman, Eric T.

In: Metabolism, Vol. 42, No. 8, 01.01.1993, p. 950-957.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A practical equation to predict resting metabolic rate in older men

AU - Arciero, Paul J.

AU - Goran, Michael I.

AU - Gardner, Andrew

AU - Ades, Philip A.

AU - Tyzbir, Robert S.

AU - Poehlman, Eric T.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - The accuracy of previous equations for predicting resting metabolic rate (RMR) in healthy older men is questionable because they are based on limited sample sizes and the absence of cross-validation procedures. The purposes of this study were to (1) examine biological predictors of RMR in healthy older men; (2) develop a practical equation to predict RMR from easily measured variables and examine its accuracy using cross-validation procedures; and (3) test the validity of existing equations in the literature to predict RMR in older men by comparison with measured RMR values. RMR, body composition, anthropometric measurements, leisure time activity (LTA), maximal aerobic power (Vo2max), energy intake, and plasma thyroid hormone levels were determined in 89 healthy older men aged 50 to 78 years. Stepwise regression analysis showed that RMR was best predicted by fat-free weight ([FFW] R2 = 85%), free 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine (T3) level (R2 = 1%), and Vo2max (R2 = 1%); these variables predicted RMR with a residual error of ±30 kcal/d. A practical equation was developed in a randomly selected subsample (N = 61) using easily measured variables as potential predictors, and was successfully cross-validated in a random subsample of older men (N = 28). The pooled equation to predict RMR is as follows: RMR (in kilocalories per day) = 9.7 (weight in kilograms) - 6.1 (chest skinfold thickness in millimeters) - 1.8 (age in years) + 0.1 (leisure time activity [LTA] in kilocalories per day) + 1,060. These variables accounted for 76% (R2) of the variation, and predicted RMR with a residual error of ±42 kcal/d. When four previously published equations were applied to predict RMR in our sample of older men, individual predicted values deviated -19% to +14% from measured values. We conclude that variations in FFW account for the greatest source of variation in RMR in older men. Current equations to predict RMR are generally imprecise on an individual basis when applied to older men. We offer a practical and successfully cross-validated equation to predict RMR in healthy older men based on measures of body weight, LTA, and chest skinfold thickness.

AB - The accuracy of previous equations for predicting resting metabolic rate (RMR) in healthy older men is questionable because they are based on limited sample sizes and the absence of cross-validation procedures. The purposes of this study were to (1) examine biological predictors of RMR in healthy older men; (2) develop a practical equation to predict RMR from easily measured variables and examine its accuracy using cross-validation procedures; and (3) test the validity of existing equations in the literature to predict RMR in older men by comparison with measured RMR values. RMR, body composition, anthropometric measurements, leisure time activity (LTA), maximal aerobic power (Vo2max), energy intake, and plasma thyroid hormone levels were determined in 89 healthy older men aged 50 to 78 years. Stepwise regression analysis showed that RMR was best predicted by fat-free weight ([FFW] R2 = 85%), free 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine (T3) level (R2 = 1%), and Vo2max (R2 = 1%); these variables predicted RMR with a residual error of ±30 kcal/d. A practical equation was developed in a randomly selected subsample (N = 61) using easily measured variables as potential predictors, and was successfully cross-validated in a random subsample of older men (N = 28). The pooled equation to predict RMR is as follows: RMR (in kilocalories per day) = 9.7 (weight in kilograms) - 6.1 (chest skinfold thickness in millimeters) - 1.8 (age in years) + 0.1 (leisure time activity [LTA] in kilocalories per day) + 1,060. These variables accounted for 76% (R2) of the variation, and predicted RMR with a residual error of ±42 kcal/d. When four previously published equations were applied to predict RMR in our sample of older men, individual predicted values deviated -19% to +14% from measured values. We conclude that variations in FFW account for the greatest source of variation in RMR in older men. Current equations to predict RMR are generally imprecise on an individual basis when applied to older men. We offer a practical and successfully cross-validated equation to predict RMR in healthy older men based on measures of body weight, LTA, and chest skinfold thickness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027304384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027304384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0026-0495(93)90006-A

DO - 10.1016/0026-0495(93)90006-A

M3 - Article

C2 - 8345818

AN - SCOPUS:0027304384

VL - 42

SP - 950

EP - 957

JO - Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental

JF - Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental

SN - 0026-0495

IS - 8

ER -