A preference for genuine smiles following social exclusion

Michael Jason Bernstein, Donald F. Sacco, Christina M. Brown, Steven G. Young, Heather M. Claypool

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research indicates that rejected individuals are better than others at discriminating between genuine (Duchenne) and deceptive (non-Duchenne) smiles (i.e., true versus false signals of affiliative opportunity). We hypothesized that rejected individuals would show a greater preference to work with individuals displaying Duchenne versus non-Duchenne smiles. To test this, participants wrote essays about experiences of inclusion, exclusion, or mundane events. They then saw a series of 20 videos of smiling individuals (10 with Duchenne and 10 with non-Duchenne smiles). Participants then indicated how much they would like to work with each target. Analyses revealed that compared to included and control participants, excluded individuals showed a greater preference to work with individuals displaying "real" as opposed to "fake" smiles. This effect was partially mediated by threats to "relational needs" (Williams, 2007) and fully mediated by threats to self-esteem. These results suggest that exclusion yields adaptive responses that could facilitate reconnection with others.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-199
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A preference for genuine smiles following social exclusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this