A Preliminary Examination of Motivating Operation and Reinforcer Class Interaction

Jonathan William Ivy, Nancy A. Neef, James N. Meindl, Neal Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The interaction effects between motivating operations and reinforcer classes were evaluated using a superordinate multielement design. Two individuals with developmental disabilities participated. Participants were exposed to a motivating operation condition-pre-session access until rejection or pre-session restriction for 24h-followed by a reinforcer assessment, in which the reinforcer response requirements progressively increased. Reinforcers, stimuli representative of primary, conditioned, and token reinforcers, were available on alternating sessions. The results showed that pre-session access and restriction produced reliable evocative and abative effects across reinforcer classes. For one of the participants, the effectiveness of the motivating operation appeared to be influenced by the reinforcer class. The interaction effects between motivating operations and reinforcer classes are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180-194
Number of pages15
JournalBehavioral Interventions
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Developmental Disabilities
Rejection (Psychology)
Interaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Ivy, Jonathan William ; Neef, Nancy A. ; Meindl, James N. ; Miller, Neal. / A Preliminary Examination of Motivating Operation and Reinforcer Class Interaction. In: Behavioral Interventions. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 180-194.
@article{b750d31d6e2045dfa21b6620d239c7ad,
title = "A Preliminary Examination of Motivating Operation and Reinforcer Class Interaction",
abstract = "The interaction effects between motivating operations and reinforcer classes were evaluated using a superordinate multielement design. Two individuals with developmental disabilities participated. Participants were exposed to a motivating operation condition-pre-session access until rejection or pre-session restriction for 24h-followed by a reinforcer assessment, in which the reinforcer response requirements progressively increased. Reinforcers, stimuli representative of primary, conditioned, and token reinforcers, were available on alternating sessions. The results showed that pre-session access and restriction produced reliable evocative and abative effects across reinforcer classes. For one of the participants, the effectiveness of the motivating operation appeared to be influenced by the reinforcer class. The interaction effects between motivating operations and reinforcer classes are discussed.",
author = "Ivy, {Jonathan William} and Neef, {Nancy A.} and Meindl, {James N.} and Neal Miller",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bin.1436",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "180--194",
journal = "Behavioral Interventions",
issn = "1072-0847",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

A Preliminary Examination of Motivating Operation and Reinforcer Class Interaction. / Ivy, Jonathan William; Neef, Nancy A.; Meindl, James N.; Miller, Neal.

In: Behavioral Interventions, Vol. 31, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 180-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Preliminary Examination of Motivating Operation and Reinforcer Class Interaction

AU - Ivy, Jonathan William

AU - Neef, Nancy A.

AU - Meindl, James N.

AU - Miller, Neal

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - The interaction effects between motivating operations and reinforcer classes were evaluated using a superordinate multielement design. Two individuals with developmental disabilities participated. Participants were exposed to a motivating operation condition-pre-session access until rejection or pre-session restriction for 24h-followed by a reinforcer assessment, in which the reinforcer response requirements progressively increased. Reinforcers, stimuli representative of primary, conditioned, and token reinforcers, were available on alternating sessions. The results showed that pre-session access and restriction produced reliable evocative and abative effects across reinforcer classes. For one of the participants, the effectiveness of the motivating operation appeared to be influenced by the reinforcer class. The interaction effects between motivating operations and reinforcer classes are discussed.

AB - The interaction effects between motivating operations and reinforcer classes were evaluated using a superordinate multielement design. Two individuals with developmental disabilities participated. Participants were exposed to a motivating operation condition-pre-session access until rejection or pre-session restriction for 24h-followed by a reinforcer assessment, in which the reinforcer response requirements progressively increased. Reinforcers, stimuli representative of primary, conditioned, and token reinforcers, were available on alternating sessions. The results showed that pre-session access and restriction produced reliable evocative and abative effects across reinforcer classes. For one of the participants, the effectiveness of the motivating operation appeared to be influenced by the reinforcer class. The interaction effects between motivating operations and reinforcer classes are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962737548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962737548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bin.1436

DO - 10.1002/bin.1436

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962737548

VL - 31

SP - 180

EP - 194

JO - Behavioral Interventions

JF - Behavioral Interventions

SN - 1072-0847

IS - 2

ER -