A qualitative study to assess how primary care versus psychiatric providers evaluate and treat pediatric patients with irritability

Anna L. Scandinaro, Usman Hameed, Cheryl Dellasega

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine how primary care versus specialist practitioners assess and treat school-aged children with irritability. Methods: Seventeen providers from family medicine, pediatrics, and psychiatry participated in in-depth interviews from June to August 2016 about the process they use to evaluate irritability. Data on demographic traits and measures of confidence were also collected. Results: Primary care (family medicine and pediatrics) participants expressed frustration over the lack of time and specialized knowledge they had to accurately assess children with irritability, even though they were often the first clinician consulted when problems arose. There were clear and sometimes contradictory differences between how practitioners with a general versus specialized practice assessed mental health status in the clinic setting. Input on treatment approaches revealed that medication prescription was more common by primary care participants, and therapy was preferred by the psychiatry participants. Conclusions: Overall, family medicine and pediatric practitioners were significantly less confident in their ability to evaluate mental health status, while child and adolescent psychiatry participants were supportive of having more initial triage and possible treatment occur at the primary care level, suggesting a need for more training about childhood irritability in the primary care setting.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Article number17m02227
JournalPrimary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Primary Health Care
Pediatrics
Medicine
Health Status
Mental Health
Adolescent Psychiatry
Child Psychiatry
Aptitude
Frustration
Triage
Prescriptions
Therapeutics
Demography
Interviews

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{67cd3a5ac589470998bf19356e3cd800,
title = "A qualitative study to assess how primary care versus psychiatric providers evaluate and treat pediatric patients with irritability",
abstract = "Objective: To determine how primary care versus specialist practitioners assess and treat school-aged children with irritability. Methods: Seventeen providers from family medicine, pediatrics, and psychiatry participated in in-depth interviews from June to August 2016 about the process they use to evaluate irritability. Data on demographic traits and measures of confidence were also collected. Results: Primary care (family medicine and pediatrics) participants expressed frustration over the lack of time and specialized knowledge they had to accurately assess children with irritability, even though they were often the first clinician consulted when problems arose. There were clear and sometimes contradictory differences between how practitioners with a general versus specialized practice assessed mental health status in the clinic setting. Input on treatment approaches revealed that medication prescription was more common by primary care participants, and therapy was preferred by the psychiatry participants. Conclusions: Overall, family medicine and pediatric practitioners were significantly less confident in their ability to evaluate mental health status, while child and adolescent psychiatry participants were supportive of having more initial triage and possible treatment occur at the primary care level, suggesting a need for more training about childhood irritability in the primary care setting.",
author = "Scandinaro, {Anna L.} and Usman Hameed and Cheryl Dellasega",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4088/PCC.17m02227",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
journal = "The primary care companion for CNS disorders",
issn = "1523-5998",
publisher = "Physicians Postgraduate Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A qualitative study to assess how primary care versus psychiatric providers evaluate and treat pediatric patients with irritability

AU - Scandinaro, Anna L.

AU - Hameed, Usman

AU - Dellasega, Cheryl

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: To determine how primary care versus specialist practitioners assess and treat school-aged children with irritability. Methods: Seventeen providers from family medicine, pediatrics, and psychiatry participated in in-depth interviews from June to August 2016 about the process they use to evaluate irritability. Data on demographic traits and measures of confidence were also collected. Results: Primary care (family medicine and pediatrics) participants expressed frustration over the lack of time and specialized knowledge they had to accurately assess children with irritability, even though they were often the first clinician consulted when problems arose. There were clear and sometimes contradictory differences between how practitioners with a general versus specialized practice assessed mental health status in the clinic setting. Input on treatment approaches revealed that medication prescription was more common by primary care participants, and therapy was preferred by the psychiatry participants. Conclusions: Overall, family medicine and pediatric practitioners were significantly less confident in their ability to evaluate mental health status, while child and adolescent psychiatry participants were supportive of having more initial triage and possible treatment occur at the primary care level, suggesting a need for more training about childhood irritability in the primary care setting.

AB - Objective: To determine how primary care versus specialist practitioners assess and treat school-aged children with irritability. Methods: Seventeen providers from family medicine, pediatrics, and psychiatry participated in in-depth interviews from June to August 2016 about the process they use to evaluate irritability. Data on demographic traits and measures of confidence were also collected. Results: Primary care (family medicine and pediatrics) participants expressed frustration over the lack of time and specialized knowledge they had to accurately assess children with irritability, even though they were often the first clinician consulted when problems arose. There were clear and sometimes contradictory differences between how practitioners with a general versus specialized practice assessed mental health status in the clinic setting. Input on treatment approaches revealed that medication prescription was more common by primary care participants, and therapy was preferred by the psychiatry participants. Conclusions: Overall, family medicine and pediatric practitioners were significantly less confident in their ability to evaluate mental health status, while child and adolescent psychiatry participants were supportive of having more initial triage and possible treatment occur at the primary care level, suggesting a need for more training about childhood irritability in the primary care setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049679862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049679862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4088/PCC.17m02227

DO - 10.4088/PCC.17m02227

M3 - Article

VL - 20

JO - The primary care companion for CNS disorders

T2 - The primary care companion for CNS disorders

JF - The primary care companion for CNS disorders

SN - 1523-5998

IS - 2

M1 - 17m02227

ER -