A quality-distinction model of IT capabilities: Conceptualization and two-stage empirical validation using CMMi processes

Rajiv Kishore, Matthew Swinarski, Eric Jackson, H. Raghav Rao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a model of information technology (IT) service provider capabilities termed the quality distinction (QD) model that is theoretically rooted in the resource-based view and quality management literatures, and operationalized using the widely used capability maturity model (CMM) framework. The QD model is theorized to consist of one dynamic capability (i.e., process adaptation capability) and three operational capabilities (i.e., life cycle, prevention quality, and appraisal quality capabilities). These four capabilities are initially operationalized using definitions of the 22 processes in the CMM integration framework. A panel of experts is used to assign the 22 processes to the four capabilities in the QD model. Rigorous scale-refinement procedures are used and 15 CMM processes are retained as a result. Survey data collected from IT service providers are, then, used to compare the theorized QD model with the staged and continuous models in the CMM framework. Results from a covariance-based structural equation modeling analysis provide good support to the hypothesis that the QD model is superior to the two CMM models (the staged and continuous representations), with the theorized model showing high fit indices and high psychometric properties. Results also provide support for the hypothesis that processes should be operationalized as routines with a combination of both ostensive and performative aspects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number6032086
Pages (from-to)457-469
Number of pages13
JournalIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Information technology
Conceptualization
Technology capability
Capability maturity model
Quality management
Life cycle

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{502f75f47b234fa091649086e98c70b3,
title = "A quality-distinction model of IT capabilities: Conceptualization and two-stage empirical validation using CMMi processes",
abstract = "In this paper, we develop a model of information technology (IT) service provider capabilities termed the quality distinction (QD) model that is theoretically rooted in the resource-based view and quality management literatures, and operationalized using the widely used capability maturity model (CMM) framework. The QD model is theorized to consist of one dynamic capability (i.e., process adaptation capability) and three operational capabilities (i.e., life cycle, prevention quality, and appraisal quality capabilities). These four capabilities are initially operationalized using definitions of the 22 processes in the CMM integration framework. A panel of experts is used to assign the 22 processes to the four capabilities in the QD model. Rigorous scale-refinement procedures are used and 15 CMM processes are retained as a result. Survey data collected from IT service providers are, then, used to compare the theorized QD model with the staged and continuous models in the CMM framework. Results from a covariance-based structural equation modeling analysis provide good support to the hypothesis that the QD model is superior to the two CMM models (the staged and continuous representations), with the theorized model showing high fit indices and high psychometric properties. Results also provide support for the hypothesis that processes should be operationalized as routines with a combination of both ostensive and performative aspects.",
author = "Rajiv Kishore and Matthew Swinarski and Eric Jackson and Rao, {H. Raghav}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TEM.2011.2165287",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "457--469",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management",
issn = "0018-9391",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "3",

}

A quality-distinction model of IT capabilities : Conceptualization and two-stage empirical validation using CMMi processes. / Kishore, Rajiv; Swinarski, Matthew; Jackson, Eric; Rao, H. Raghav.

In: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 59, No. 3, 6032086, 01.01.2012, p. 457-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quality-distinction model of IT capabilities

T2 - Conceptualization and two-stage empirical validation using CMMi processes

AU - Kishore, Rajiv

AU - Swinarski, Matthew

AU - Jackson, Eric

AU - Rao, H. Raghav

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - In this paper, we develop a model of information technology (IT) service provider capabilities termed the quality distinction (QD) model that is theoretically rooted in the resource-based view and quality management literatures, and operationalized using the widely used capability maturity model (CMM) framework. The QD model is theorized to consist of one dynamic capability (i.e., process adaptation capability) and three operational capabilities (i.e., life cycle, prevention quality, and appraisal quality capabilities). These four capabilities are initially operationalized using definitions of the 22 processes in the CMM integration framework. A panel of experts is used to assign the 22 processes to the four capabilities in the QD model. Rigorous scale-refinement procedures are used and 15 CMM processes are retained as a result. Survey data collected from IT service providers are, then, used to compare the theorized QD model with the staged and continuous models in the CMM framework. Results from a covariance-based structural equation modeling analysis provide good support to the hypothesis that the QD model is superior to the two CMM models (the staged and continuous representations), with the theorized model showing high fit indices and high psychometric properties. Results also provide support for the hypothesis that processes should be operationalized as routines with a combination of both ostensive and performative aspects.

AB - In this paper, we develop a model of information technology (IT) service provider capabilities termed the quality distinction (QD) model that is theoretically rooted in the resource-based view and quality management literatures, and operationalized using the widely used capability maturity model (CMM) framework. The QD model is theorized to consist of one dynamic capability (i.e., process adaptation capability) and three operational capabilities (i.e., life cycle, prevention quality, and appraisal quality capabilities). These four capabilities are initially operationalized using definitions of the 22 processes in the CMM integration framework. A panel of experts is used to assign the 22 processes to the four capabilities in the QD model. Rigorous scale-refinement procedures are used and 15 CMM processes are retained as a result. Survey data collected from IT service providers are, then, used to compare the theorized QD model with the staged and continuous models in the CMM framework. Results from a covariance-based structural equation modeling analysis provide good support to the hypothesis that the QD model is superior to the two CMM models (the staged and continuous representations), with the theorized model showing high fit indices and high psychometric properties. Results also provide support for the hypothesis that processes should be operationalized as routines with a combination of both ostensive and performative aspects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864153822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864153822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TEM.2011.2165287

DO - 10.1109/TEM.2011.2165287

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84864153822

VL - 59

SP - 457

EP - 469

JO - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

JF - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

SN - 0018-9391

IS - 3

M1 - 6032086

ER -