A quantitative analysis of the relationship between congestion and reliability in electric power networks

Seth Adam Blumsack, Lester B. Lave, Marija Ilić

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Restructuring efforts in the U.S. electric power sector have tried to encourage transmission investment by independent (non-utility) transmission companies, and have promoted various levels of market-based transmission investment. Underlying this shift to "merchant" transmission investment is an assumption that new transmission infrastructure can be classified as providing a congestion-relief benefit or a reliability benefit. In this paper, we demonstrate that this assumption is largely incorrect for meshed interconnections such as electric power networks. We focus on a particular network topology known as the Wheatstone network to show how congestion and reliability can represent tradeoffs. Lines that cause congestion may be justified on reliability grounds. We decompose the congestion and reliability effects of a given network alteration, and demonstrate their dependence through simulations on a 118-bus test network. The true relationship between congestion and reliability depends critically on identifying the relevant range of demand for evaluating any network externalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages73-100
Number of pages28
Volume28
No4
Specialist publicationEnergy Journal
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Chemical analysis
Topology
Congestion
Electric power
Quantitative analysis
Industry
Merchants
Interconnection
Network topology
Trade-offs
Network externalities
Bus
Simulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Energy(all)

Cite this

@misc{4f8555fc2bf744bb9a621a0be30c64ec,
title = "A quantitative analysis of the relationship between congestion and reliability in electric power networks",
abstract = "Restructuring efforts in the U.S. electric power sector have tried to encourage transmission investment by independent (non-utility) transmission companies, and have promoted various levels of market-based transmission investment. Underlying this shift to {"}merchant{"} transmission investment is an assumption that new transmission infrastructure can be classified as providing a congestion-relief benefit or a reliability benefit. In this paper, we demonstrate that this assumption is largely incorrect for meshed interconnections such as electric power networks. We focus on a particular network topology known as the Wheatstone network to show how congestion and reliability can represent tradeoffs. Lines that cause congestion may be justified on reliability grounds. We decompose the congestion and reliability effects of a given network alteration, and demonstrate their dependence through simulations on a 118-bus test network. The true relationship between congestion and reliability depends critically on identifying the relevant range of demand for evaluating any network externalities.",
author = "Blumsack, {Seth Adam} and Lave, {Lester B.} and Marija Ilić",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No4-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "73--100",
journal = "Energy Journal",
issn = "0195-6574",
publisher = "International Association for Energy Economics",

}

A quantitative analysis of the relationship between congestion and reliability in electric power networks. / Blumsack, Seth Adam; Lave, Lester B.; Ilić, Marija.

In: Energy Journal, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.01.2007, p. 73-100.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

TY - GEN

T1 - A quantitative analysis of the relationship between congestion and reliability in electric power networks

AU - Blumsack, Seth Adam

AU - Lave, Lester B.

AU - Ilić, Marija

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Restructuring efforts in the U.S. electric power sector have tried to encourage transmission investment by independent (non-utility) transmission companies, and have promoted various levels of market-based transmission investment. Underlying this shift to "merchant" transmission investment is an assumption that new transmission infrastructure can be classified as providing a congestion-relief benefit or a reliability benefit. In this paper, we demonstrate that this assumption is largely incorrect for meshed interconnections such as electric power networks. We focus on a particular network topology known as the Wheatstone network to show how congestion and reliability can represent tradeoffs. Lines that cause congestion may be justified on reliability grounds. We decompose the congestion and reliability effects of a given network alteration, and demonstrate their dependence through simulations on a 118-bus test network. The true relationship between congestion and reliability depends critically on identifying the relevant range of demand for evaluating any network externalities.

AB - Restructuring efforts in the U.S. electric power sector have tried to encourage transmission investment by independent (non-utility) transmission companies, and have promoted various levels of market-based transmission investment. Underlying this shift to "merchant" transmission investment is an assumption that new transmission infrastructure can be classified as providing a congestion-relief benefit or a reliability benefit. In this paper, we demonstrate that this assumption is largely incorrect for meshed interconnections such as electric power networks. We focus on a particular network topology known as the Wheatstone network to show how congestion and reliability can represent tradeoffs. Lines that cause congestion may be justified on reliability grounds. We decompose the congestion and reliability effects of a given network alteration, and demonstrate their dependence through simulations on a 118-bus test network. The true relationship between congestion and reliability depends critically on identifying the relevant range of demand for evaluating any network externalities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35348938982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35348938982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No4-4

DO - 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No4-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:35348938982

VL - 28

SP - 73

EP - 100

JO - Energy Journal

JF - Energy Journal

SN - 0195-6574

ER -