Abstract

Objective: To evaluate 2 strategies for preparing family members for surrogate decision-making. Design: A 2 × 2 factorial, randomized controlled trial testing whether: (1) comprehensive online advance care planning (ACP) is superior to basic ACP, and (2) having patients engage in ACP together with family members is superior to ACP done by patients alone. Setting: Tertiary care centers in Hershey, Pennsylvania, and Boston, Massachusetts. Participants: Dyads of patients with advanced, severe illness (mean age 64; 46% female; 72% white) and family members who would be their surrogate decision-makers (mean age 56; 75% female; 75% white). Interventions: Basic ACP: state-approved online advance directive plus brochure. Making Your Wishes Known (MYWK): Comprehensive ACP decision aid including education and values clarification. Measurements: Pre–post changes in family member self-efficacy (100-point scale) and postintervention concordance between patients and family members using clinical vignettes. Results: A total 285 dyads enrolled; 267 patients and 267 family members completed measures. Baseline self-efficacy in both MYWK and basic ACP groups was high (90.2 and 90.1, respectively), and increased postintervention to 92.1 for MYWK (P =.13) and 93.3 for basic ACP (P =.004), with no between-group difference. Baseline self-efficacy in alone and together groups was also high (90.2 and 90.1, respectively), and increased to 92.6 for alone (P =.03) and 92.8 for together (P =.03), with no between-group difference. Overall adjusted concordance was higher in MYWK compared to basic ACP (85.2% vs 79.7%; P =.032), with no between-group difference. Conclusion: The disconnect between confidence and performance raises questions about how to prepare family members to be surrogate decision-makers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)866-874
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Advance Care Planning
Decision Making
Randomized Controlled Trials
Self Efficacy
Advance Directives
Pamphlets
Decision Support Techniques
varespladib methyl
Tertiary Care Centers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Green, Michael J. ; Van Scoy, Lauren J. ; Foy, Andrew J. ; Stewart, Renee R. ; Sampath, Ramya ; Schubart, Jane R. ; Lehman, Erik B. ; Dimmock, Anne E.F. ; Bucher, Ashley M. ; Lehmann, Lisa S. ; Harlow, Alyssa F. ; Yang, Chengwu ; Levi, Benjamin H. / A Randomized Controlled Trial of Strategies to Improve Family Members’ Preparedness for Surrogate Decision-Making. In: American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 35, No. 6. pp. 866-874.
@article{30d74a10a4e34415bf8b0002d69e71f6,
title = "A Randomized Controlled Trial of Strategies to Improve Family Members’ Preparedness for Surrogate Decision-Making",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate 2 strategies for preparing family members for surrogate decision-making. Design: A 2 × 2 factorial, randomized controlled trial testing whether: (1) comprehensive online advance care planning (ACP) is superior to basic ACP, and (2) having patients engage in ACP together with family members is superior to ACP done by patients alone. Setting: Tertiary care centers in Hershey, Pennsylvania, and Boston, Massachusetts. Participants: Dyads of patients with advanced, severe illness (mean age 64; 46{\%} female; 72{\%} white) and family members who would be their surrogate decision-makers (mean age 56; 75{\%} female; 75{\%} white). Interventions: Basic ACP: state-approved online advance directive plus brochure. Making Your Wishes Known (MYWK): Comprehensive ACP decision aid including education and values clarification. Measurements: Pre–post changes in family member self-efficacy (100-point scale) and postintervention concordance between patients and family members using clinical vignettes. Results: A total 285 dyads enrolled; 267 patients and 267 family members completed measures. Baseline self-efficacy in both MYWK and basic ACP groups was high (90.2 and 90.1, respectively), and increased postintervention to 92.1 for MYWK (P =.13) and 93.3 for basic ACP (P =.004), with no between-group difference. Baseline self-efficacy in alone and together groups was also high (90.2 and 90.1, respectively), and increased to 92.6 for alone (P =.03) and 92.8 for together (P =.03), with no between-group difference. Overall adjusted concordance was higher in MYWK compared to basic ACP (85.2{\%} vs 79.7{\%}; P =.032), with no between-group difference. Conclusion: The disconnect between confidence and performance raises questions about how to prepare family members to be surrogate decision-makers.",
author = "Green, {Michael J.} and {Van Scoy}, {Lauren J.} and Foy, {Andrew J.} and Stewart, {Renee R.} and Ramya Sampath and Schubart, {Jane R.} and Lehman, {Erik B.} and Dimmock, {Anne E.F.} and Bucher, {Ashley M.} and Lehmann, {Lisa S.} and Harlow, {Alyssa F.} and Chengwu Yang and Levi, {Benjamin H.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1049909117744554",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "866--874",
journal = "American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1049-9091",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Strategies to Improve Family Members’ Preparedness for Surrogate Decision-Making. / Green, Michael J.; Van Scoy, Lauren J.; Foy, Andrew J.; Stewart, Renee R.; Sampath, Ramya; Schubart, Jane R.; Lehman, Erik B.; Dimmock, Anne E.F.; Bucher, Ashley M.; Lehmann, Lisa S.; Harlow, Alyssa F.; Yang, Chengwu; Levi, Benjamin H.

In: American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Vol. 35, No. 6, 01.06.2018, p. 866-874.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of Strategies to Improve Family Members’ Preparedness for Surrogate Decision-Making

AU - Green, Michael J.

AU - Van Scoy, Lauren J.

AU - Foy, Andrew J.

AU - Stewart, Renee R.

AU - Sampath, Ramya

AU - Schubart, Jane R.

AU - Lehman, Erik B.

AU - Dimmock, Anne E.F.

AU - Bucher, Ashley M.

AU - Lehmann, Lisa S.

AU - Harlow, Alyssa F.

AU - Yang, Chengwu

AU - Levi, Benjamin H.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate 2 strategies for preparing family members for surrogate decision-making. Design: A 2 × 2 factorial, randomized controlled trial testing whether: (1) comprehensive online advance care planning (ACP) is superior to basic ACP, and (2) having patients engage in ACP together with family members is superior to ACP done by patients alone. Setting: Tertiary care centers in Hershey, Pennsylvania, and Boston, Massachusetts. Participants: Dyads of patients with advanced, severe illness (mean age 64; 46% female; 72% white) and family members who would be their surrogate decision-makers (mean age 56; 75% female; 75% white). Interventions: Basic ACP: state-approved online advance directive plus brochure. Making Your Wishes Known (MYWK): Comprehensive ACP decision aid including education and values clarification. Measurements: Pre–post changes in family member self-efficacy (100-point scale) and postintervention concordance between patients and family members using clinical vignettes. Results: A total 285 dyads enrolled; 267 patients and 267 family members completed measures. Baseline self-efficacy in both MYWK and basic ACP groups was high (90.2 and 90.1, respectively), and increased postintervention to 92.1 for MYWK (P =.13) and 93.3 for basic ACP (P =.004), with no between-group difference. Baseline self-efficacy in alone and together groups was also high (90.2 and 90.1, respectively), and increased to 92.6 for alone (P =.03) and 92.8 for together (P =.03), with no between-group difference. Overall adjusted concordance was higher in MYWK compared to basic ACP (85.2% vs 79.7%; P =.032), with no between-group difference. Conclusion: The disconnect between confidence and performance raises questions about how to prepare family members to be surrogate decision-makers.

AB - Objective: To evaluate 2 strategies for preparing family members for surrogate decision-making. Design: A 2 × 2 factorial, randomized controlled trial testing whether: (1) comprehensive online advance care planning (ACP) is superior to basic ACP, and (2) having patients engage in ACP together with family members is superior to ACP done by patients alone. Setting: Tertiary care centers in Hershey, Pennsylvania, and Boston, Massachusetts. Participants: Dyads of patients with advanced, severe illness (mean age 64; 46% female; 72% white) and family members who would be their surrogate decision-makers (mean age 56; 75% female; 75% white). Interventions: Basic ACP: state-approved online advance directive plus brochure. Making Your Wishes Known (MYWK): Comprehensive ACP decision aid including education and values clarification. Measurements: Pre–post changes in family member self-efficacy (100-point scale) and postintervention concordance between patients and family members using clinical vignettes. Results: A total 285 dyads enrolled; 267 patients and 267 family members completed measures. Baseline self-efficacy in both MYWK and basic ACP groups was high (90.2 and 90.1, respectively), and increased postintervention to 92.1 for MYWK (P =.13) and 93.3 for basic ACP (P =.004), with no between-group difference. Baseline self-efficacy in alone and together groups was also high (90.2 and 90.1, respectively), and increased to 92.6 for alone (P =.03) and 92.8 for together (P =.03), with no between-group difference. Overall adjusted concordance was higher in MYWK compared to basic ACP (85.2% vs 79.7%; P =.032), with no between-group difference. Conclusion: The disconnect between confidence and performance raises questions about how to prepare family members to be surrogate decision-makers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042087872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042087872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049909117744554

DO - 10.1177/1049909117744554

M3 - Article

C2 - 29186982

AN - SCOPUS:85042087872

VL - 35

SP - 866

EP - 874

JO - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

JF - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

SN - 1049-9091

IS - 6

ER -