A Rational Expectations Consistent Measure of Risk

Using Financial Market Data from a Middle Income Context

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although economic theory assumes that risk is of central importance in financial decision making, it is difficult to measure the uncertainty faced by investors. Commonly used empirical proxies for risk (such as the moving standard deviation of the returns on an asset) are not firmly grounded in economic theory. Risk measures have been developed by other studies, but these are often based on subjective weights attaching to a range of objective component indicators, are difficult to replicate and are not strictly consistent with underlying theory. The contribution of this article is to develop a methodology to construct rational expectations consistent empirical risk measures. It has the advantages of being explicitly consistent with economic theory and easily replicable. We illustrate this methodology by specific application to the South African context. The time-varying risk measure developed in this article is consistent with a rational expectations application of the expectations hypothesis. The constructed measure is a broad one (it includes political risk and peso problems for instance) and reflects investors' perceptions of systematic risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)769-793
Number of pages25
JournalOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Volume72
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

Rational Expectations
Financial Markets
financial market
Risk Measures
income
Economics
economic theory
Empirical Measures
Methodology
investor
Standard deviation
Time-varying
Strictly
Decision Making
Uncertainty
methodology
Context
Rational expectations
Financial markets
Economic theory

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this

@article{a0a874ce24d641c39863ef8770cea34f,
title = "A Rational Expectations Consistent Measure of Risk: Using Financial Market Data from a Middle Income Context",
abstract = "Although economic theory assumes that risk is of central importance in financial decision making, it is difficult to measure the uncertainty faced by investors. Commonly used empirical proxies for risk (such as the moving standard deviation of the returns on an asset) are not firmly grounded in economic theory. Risk measures have been developed by other studies, but these are often based on subjective weights attaching to a range of objective component indicators, are difficult to replicate and are not strictly consistent with underlying theory. The contribution of this article is to develop a methodology to construct rational expectations consistent empirical risk measures. It has the advantages of being explicitly consistent with economic theory and easily replicable. We illustrate this methodology by specific application to the South African context. The time-varying risk measure developed in this article is consistent with a rational expectations application of the expectations hypothesis. The constructed measure is a broad one (it includes political risk and peso problems for instance) and reflects investors' perceptions of systematic risk.",
author = "Fedderke, {Johannes Wolfgang} and Neryvia Pillay",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0084.2010.00598.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "769--793",
journal = "Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics",
issn = "0305-9049",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Rational Expectations Consistent Measure of Risk

T2 - Using Financial Market Data from a Middle Income Context

AU - Fedderke, Johannes Wolfgang

AU - Pillay, Neryvia

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Although economic theory assumes that risk is of central importance in financial decision making, it is difficult to measure the uncertainty faced by investors. Commonly used empirical proxies for risk (such as the moving standard deviation of the returns on an asset) are not firmly grounded in economic theory. Risk measures have been developed by other studies, but these are often based on subjective weights attaching to a range of objective component indicators, are difficult to replicate and are not strictly consistent with underlying theory. The contribution of this article is to develop a methodology to construct rational expectations consistent empirical risk measures. It has the advantages of being explicitly consistent with economic theory and easily replicable. We illustrate this methodology by specific application to the South African context. The time-varying risk measure developed in this article is consistent with a rational expectations application of the expectations hypothesis. The constructed measure is a broad one (it includes political risk and peso problems for instance) and reflects investors' perceptions of systematic risk.

AB - Although economic theory assumes that risk is of central importance in financial decision making, it is difficult to measure the uncertainty faced by investors. Commonly used empirical proxies for risk (such as the moving standard deviation of the returns on an asset) are not firmly grounded in economic theory. Risk measures have been developed by other studies, but these are often based on subjective weights attaching to a range of objective component indicators, are difficult to replicate and are not strictly consistent with underlying theory. The contribution of this article is to develop a methodology to construct rational expectations consistent empirical risk measures. It has the advantages of being explicitly consistent with economic theory and easily replicable. We illustrate this methodology by specific application to the South African context. The time-varying risk measure developed in this article is consistent with a rational expectations application of the expectations hypothesis. The constructed measure is a broad one (it includes political risk and peso problems for instance) and reflects investors' perceptions of systematic risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649687537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649687537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2010.00598.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2010.00598.x

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 769

EP - 793

JO - Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics

JF - Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics

SN - 0305-9049

IS - 6

ER -