A reasonably large review of operationalization in child maltreatment research: Assessment approaches and sources of information in youth samples

Yolanda Jackson, Austen McGuire, Angela M. Tunno, P. Kalani Makanui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Child maltreatment research varies considerably in how maltreatment is measured. Although researchers have advocated for improvements in maltreatment assessment, a first step is a clear understanding of the status on how the field operationalizes maltreatment. The current paper sought to achieve this goal through reviewing research on child maltreatment over a recent 10-year span to identify trends in maltreatment assessment and operationalization. Information on maltreatment measurement was extracted from 338 articles across three major journals devoted to publishing research on child maltreatment. Among the various definitional dimensions of maltreatment, type was the most common way maltreatment was operationalized, followed by severity, frequency, and chronicity, a stable trend across the 10-year span of review. The results indicated that the majority of studies measured maltreatment as consisting of multiple types, although some studies focused on one type of maltreatment as the indicator of child maltreatment. Further, the most common assessment method was the administration of a questionnaire or the combination of two questionnaires with the second most common being summaries from case file review. Recommendations for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-17
Number of pages13
JournalChild Abuse and Neglect
Volume87
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Child Abuse
Research
Research Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{77bf71055bd442cfaef435610bc72d5c,
title = "A reasonably large review of operationalization in child maltreatment research: Assessment approaches and sources of information in youth samples",
abstract = "Child maltreatment research varies considerably in how maltreatment is measured. Although researchers have advocated for improvements in maltreatment assessment, a first step is a clear understanding of the status on how the field operationalizes maltreatment. The current paper sought to achieve this goal through reviewing research on child maltreatment over a recent 10-year span to identify trends in maltreatment assessment and operationalization. Information on maltreatment measurement was extracted from 338 articles across three major journals devoted to publishing research on child maltreatment. Among the various definitional dimensions of maltreatment, type was the most common way maltreatment was operationalized, followed by severity, frequency, and chronicity, a stable trend across the 10-year span of review. The results indicated that the majority of studies measured maltreatment as consisting of multiple types, although some studies focused on one type of maltreatment as the indicator of child maltreatment. Further, the most common assessment method was the administration of a questionnaire or the combination of two questionnaires with the second most common being summaries from case file review. Recommendations for future research are discussed.",
author = "Yolanda Jackson and Austen McGuire and Tunno, {Angela M.} and Makanui, {P. Kalani}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.09.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "5--17",
journal = "Child Abuse and Neglect",
issn = "0145-2134",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

A reasonably large review of operationalization in child maltreatment research : Assessment approaches and sources of information in youth samples. / Jackson, Yolanda; McGuire, Austen; Tunno, Angela M.; Makanui, P. Kalani.

In: Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 87, 01.01.2019, p. 5-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A reasonably large review of operationalization in child maltreatment research

T2 - Assessment approaches and sources of information in youth samples

AU - Jackson, Yolanda

AU - McGuire, Austen

AU - Tunno, Angela M.

AU - Makanui, P. Kalani

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Child maltreatment research varies considerably in how maltreatment is measured. Although researchers have advocated for improvements in maltreatment assessment, a first step is a clear understanding of the status on how the field operationalizes maltreatment. The current paper sought to achieve this goal through reviewing research on child maltreatment over a recent 10-year span to identify trends in maltreatment assessment and operationalization. Information on maltreatment measurement was extracted from 338 articles across three major journals devoted to publishing research on child maltreatment. Among the various definitional dimensions of maltreatment, type was the most common way maltreatment was operationalized, followed by severity, frequency, and chronicity, a stable trend across the 10-year span of review. The results indicated that the majority of studies measured maltreatment as consisting of multiple types, although some studies focused on one type of maltreatment as the indicator of child maltreatment. Further, the most common assessment method was the administration of a questionnaire or the combination of two questionnaires with the second most common being summaries from case file review. Recommendations for future research are discussed.

AB - Child maltreatment research varies considerably in how maltreatment is measured. Although researchers have advocated for improvements in maltreatment assessment, a first step is a clear understanding of the status on how the field operationalizes maltreatment. The current paper sought to achieve this goal through reviewing research on child maltreatment over a recent 10-year span to identify trends in maltreatment assessment and operationalization. Information on maltreatment measurement was extracted from 338 articles across three major journals devoted to publishing research on child maltreatment. Among the various definitional dimensions of maltreatment, type was the most common way maltreatment was operationalized, followed by severity, frequency, and chronicity, a stable trend across the 10-year span of review. The results indicated that the majority of studies measured maltreatment as consisting of multiple types, although some studies focused on one type of maltreatment as the indicator of child maltreatment. Further, the most common assessment method was the administration of a questionnaire or the combination of two questionnaires with the second most common being summaries from case file review. Recommendations for future research are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055750278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055750278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.09.016

DO - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.09.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 30392993

AN - SCOPUS:85055750278

VL - 87

SP - 5

EP - 17

JO - Child Abuse and Neglect

JF - Child Abuse and Neglect

SN - 0145-2134

ER -