A report card on the freshman class of consumer-directed health plans: Consumer-directed plans need major refinements if they are to substantially improve the affordability and quality of care

Meredith Rosenthal, Charleen Hsuan, Arnold Milstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We used a series of case studies of first-generation consumer-directed health plans to investigate their early experience and the suitability of their design for reducing the growth in health benefit spending and improving the value of that spending. We found three fundamental but correctible weaknesses: Most plans do not make available comparative measures of quality and longitudinal cost-efficiency in enough detail to help consumers discern higher-value health care options; financial incentives for consumers are weak and insensitive to differences in value among the selections that consumers make; and none of the plans made cost-sharing adjustments to preserve freedom of choice for low-income consumers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1592-1600
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2005

Fingerprint

Cost Sharing
Social Adjustment
Quality of Health Care
Insurance Benefits
Motivation
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health
Growth

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{ac302f45a44541958b0764da1021ff65,
title = "A report card on the freshman class of consumer-directed health plans: Consumer-directed plans need major refinements if they are to substantially improve the affordability and quality of care",
abstract = "We used a series of case studies of first-generation consumer-directed health plans to investigate their early experience and the suitability of their design for reducing the growth in health benefit spending and improving the value of that spending. We found three fundamental but correctible weaknesses: Most plans do not make available comparative measures of quality and longitudinal cost-efficiency in enough detail to help consumers discern higher-value health care options; financial incentives for consumers are weak and insensitive to differences in value among the selections that consumers make; and none of the plans made cost-sharing adjustments to preserve freedom of choice for low-income consumers.",
author = "Meredith Rosenthal and Charleen Hsuan and Arnold Milstein",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1592",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1592--1600",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A report card on the freshman class of consumer-directed health plans

T2 - Consumer-directed plans need major refinements if they are to substantially improve the affordability and quality of care

AU - Rosenthal, Meredith

AU - Hsuan, Charleen

AU - Milstein, Arnold

PY - 2005/11/1

Y1 - 2005/11/1

N2 - We used a series of case studies of first-generation consumer-directed health plans to investigate their early experience and the suitability of their design for reducing the growth in health benefit spending and improving the value of that spending. We found three fundamental but correctible weaknesses: Most plans do not make available comparative measures of quality and longitudinal cost-efficiency in enough detail to help consumers discern higher-value health care options; financial incentives for consumers are weak and insensitive to differences in value among the selections that consumers make; and none of the plans made cost-sharing adjustments to preserve freedom of choice for low-income consumers.

AB - We used a series of case studies of first-generation consumer-directed health plans to investigate their early experience and the suitability of their design for reducing the growth in health benefit spending and improving the value of that spending. We found three fundamental but correctible weaknesses: Most plans do not make available comparative measures of quality and longitudinal cost-efficiency in enough detail to help consumers discern higher-value health care options; financial incentives for consumers are weak and insensitive to differences in value among the selections that consumers make; and none of the plans made cost-sharing adjustments to preserve freedom of choice for low-income consumers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28444486905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28444486905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1592

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1592

M3 - Article

C2 - 16284033

AN - SCOPUS:28444486905

VL - 24

SP - 1592

EP - 1600

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 6

ER -